Page 2 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

03 Mar 2011, 5:59 pm

Kipling was not without wisdom but Mowgli even before the horrors of Disnification shows that in some areas he went beyond knowledge.

There are seasons.

But - seems to me we had a discussion very close to this before - children are NOT born atheists.

How would they come out of the womb convinced "there is no God"? Could be cute - a baby is born in Morocco or Iraq, and after the first cry, he shouts, "Ashhadu an la ilaha" - and stops.

But no.

They come out knowing nothing. But with a built in capacity to know English, Ainu, Math, Ag Econ, other people, God.

They do not belong at birth to any nation, tribe, language, religion.

But atheism has to be learned, and atheism cannot even exist unless there are some who know God.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

03 Mar 2011, 8:59 pm

"There is nothing so absurd that some philosopher hasn't said it." - Cicero.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

03 Mar 2011, 9:08 pm

JWC wrote:
Do some research on ferrel (sic) children, and abused children who lived in extreme isolation (ie locked in a closet); they are fascinating. One thing to remember when approaching the nature verses nurture: all of the current studies into this dichotomy fail to account for the volition of the subject. Basically, no matter how bad the environment it is important to remember that you still have a choice, to allow yourself to be controlled by your environment or to control it.
Exactly.



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

04 Mar 2011, 1:39 am

Philologos wrote:
If you tell a man a fishy story, he can quote it.

I wonder - if we took turns, the AGNATHs do a religion debunking quote, then the theists a religion advancing quote - how long would it take till one side ran out of quotes?

And which side would run out first?

And what would it prove or whom would it convincce -- of anything but the folly of debate?


Well said...


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Mar 2011, 7:08 am

Many man swallow, fu man chu --- Saxxe Rohmer

ruveyn



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

04 Mar 2011, 9:00 am

My wife predicts [I am supposed to be the cynic and pessimist] the exchange of quotes would never run out, but cease at the End.



Natty_Boh
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 756
Location: Baltimore County

04 Mar 2011, 9:08 am

TheKing wrote:
Natty_Boh wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
We would need, in short, to find an absurdity - or an example of the worst kind of child abuse possible.


Oh that one is very easy! EVERY SINGLE ONE OF FRED PHELPS KIDS, GRANDKIDS, AND GREAT-GRANDKIDS well only 9 of his 13 children and dozens of grandchildren are tainted by his evil the other 4 of his children he claims have "fallen" which means they are normal-or as normal as any human


No, they got clawed by it all too. Can you imagine sitting down and write a newspaper letter like that one, about your own father? But I meant a child deprived of all education, even the most elementary; anything whatsoever that might constitute knowledge and thus "inculcate" the child with either faith or atheism. For the Ernestine Rose claim to be proven, you'd need to find one - but a child that deprived cannot exist.


_________________
For men are homesick in their homes,
And strangers under the sun,
And they lay their heads in a foreign land
Whenever the day is done."


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

04 Mar 2011, 9:39 am

Herodotus tells the story, how that one of the Persian kings, perhaps Cyrus, wanted to know which language was the original. Not having either solid scientific training nor sound advice, he devised an experiment.

He put a baby of each gender into a carefully arranged environment - in the palace or not do not ask me - and set it up that the children's caregivers would supply food and clothing and of course examples of body language and other behaviors, but never utter a word. In time the caregivers heard one child say something to the other. They noted it down and took it to the king.

He sent out emissaries who found the sound sequence matched and Egyptian word. The king then decided Egyptian was the oldest and original language and ever after, we are told, honored the Egyptians.

I do not intend and surely do not need to point out the flaws in this research program, if it be not apocryphal.

But surely one would have to conduct an equally absurd experiment to test the Rose proposition - which would fail since one cannot find out if a child believes there is no divine entity without explaining the concept and destroying the experiment,

Simpler to point out to Ernestne that she is misusing the term "atheist" and move on. These days the rules on human experimentation would probably block the test. How would you make it double blind, anyway?



Natty_Boh
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 756
Location: Baltimore County

04 Mar 2011, 9:58 am

^^^ I think the experiment was tried once, or maybe it was a different telling of Herodotus' tale. The babies died for want of affection.


_________________
For men are homesick in their homes,
And strangers under the sun,
And they lay their heads in a foreign land
Whenever the day is done."


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

04 Mar 2011, 10:06 am

If it was attempted - which would be criminal - I could readily believe that the outcome. Another reason Herodotus here is demonstrating the uncritical use of evidence for which he is often reproached. A mine of invaluable data, a good read - but he is no Didymist.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Mar 2011, 10:10 am

Inspirational quote Not From the Bible:

If thine enemy smite thee on thy cheek, decapitate him and defecate down his severed neck.

ruveyn



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

04 Mar 2011, 11:07 am

Remind me not to invite you for tea.

Though I suspect you have never had occasion to act in accordance with the precept. Neither easy nor fun. But perhaps those are not among your values.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

04 Mar 2011, 11:40 am

ruveyn wrote:
Inspirational quote Not From the Bible:

If thine enemy smite thee on thy cheek, decapitate him and defecate down his severed neck.

ruveyn


Yep, that would definitely not be from the Bible. These would be though:

Say not thou, I will recompense evil; but wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee. - Proverbs 20:22

Whoso rewardeth evil for good, evil shall not depart from his house. - Proverbs 17:13

Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work. - Proverbs 24:29

Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. - Matthew 5:38-39

Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good. - Romans 12:17-21



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Mar 2011, 4:08 pm

Philologos wrote:
Remind me not to invite you for tea.

Though I suspect you have never had occasion to act in accordance with the precept. Neither easy nor fun. But perhaps those are not among your values.


Schadenfreude is my favorite hobby.

ruveyn



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

05 Mar 2011, 10:09 am

You should just for a month try Skeptical Pessimism. That too is if not really enjoyable at least not without some grim gratification.

And it is less messy than your suggestion.