Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

June 13 New Hampshire Republican Debate

Page 2 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Who do you think won the debate?
Gingrich 33%  33%  [ 2 ]
Bachman 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Cain 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Romney 17%  17%  [ 1 ]
Paul 50%  50%  [ 3 ]
Santorum 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Pawlenty 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 6

pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

15 Jun 2011, 9:51 pm

psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.


Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Jun 2011, 9:56 pm

pandabear wrote:
psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.


Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.


It is all tied up now, and it wouldn't surprise me if a certain candidate's votes are from people that will vote for Obama regardless.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

15 Jun 2011, 10:03 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.


Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.


It is all tied up now, and it wouldn't surprise me if a certain candidate's votes are from people that will vote for Obama regardless.


Obama wasn't offered as a choice in the poll. He didn't participate in the debate.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Jun 2011, 10:05 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.


Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.


It is all tied up now, and it wouldn't surprise me if a certain candidate's votes are from people that will vote for Obama regardless.


Obama wasn't offered as a choice in the poll. He didn't participate in the debate.


I'm suggesting people voted in the candidate that Obama could most easily beat because Ron Paul is arguably a basket case.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

15 Jun 2011, 10:07 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.


Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.


It is all tied up now, and it wouldn't surprise me if a certain candidate's votes are from people that will vote for Obama regardless.


Obama wasn't offered as a choice in the poll. He didn't participate in the debate.


I'm suggesting people voted in the candidate that Obama could most easily beat because Ron Paul is arguably a basket case.


Don't worry: Obama will defeat any and all comers.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Jun 2011, 10:11 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.


Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.


It is all tied up now, and it wouldn't surprise me if a certain candidate's votes are from people that will vote for Obama regardless.


Obama wasn't offered as a choice in the poll. He didn't participate in the debate.


I'm suggesting people voted in the candidate that Obama could most easily beat because Ron Paul is arguably a basket case.


Don't worry: Obama will defeat any and all comers.


As I pointed out before, seems you want to live under an oppressive regime.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

15 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm

No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm

pandabear wrote:
No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.


Bush never called fellow Americans whom disagreed with him "the enemy." Obama has.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

15 Jun 2011, 10:21 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.


Bush never called fellow Americans whom disagreed with him "the enemy." Obama has.


Again, it is "who", not "whom."



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.


Bush never called fellow Americans whom disagreed with him "the enemy." Obama has.


Again, it is "who", not "whom."


I could care less, if I choose to use "whom" instead of "who" for my style of writing, that is my business, you are not a grammar instructor. What next you going to go crazy over my comma usage? :roll:



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

15 Jun 2011, 10:30 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.


Bush never called fellow Americans whom disagreed with him "the enemy." Obama has.


Again, it is "who", not "whom."


I could care less, if I choose to use "whom" instead of "who" for my style of writing, that is my business, you are not a grammar instructor. What next you going to go crazy over my comma usage? :roll:


It just goes to show how pathetic our grammar schools have become. :roll:



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Jun 2011, 10:33 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.


Bush never called fellow Americans whom disagreed with him "the enemy." Obama has.


Again, it is "who", not "whom."


I could care less, if I choose to use "whom" instead of "who" for my style of writing, that is my business, you are not a grammar instructor. What next you going to go crazy over my comma usage? :roll:


It just goes to show how pathetic our grammar schools have become. :roll:


I'm responding to posts in a forum, I'm not writing a paper...



psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

15 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm

pandabear wrote:
psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.

Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.

The poll asked who we thought won the debate, not who we would vote for.

Still, it's interesting that Ron Paul is getting so many votes. I guess his strict pro-life stance is more popular than I realized.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Jun 2011, 11:24 pm

psychohist wrote:
pandabear wrote:
psychohist wrote:
Clearly if only aspies voted in the primary, Gingrich would have the nomination tied up.

Well, he is behind in this thread's poll.

The poll asked who we thought won the debate, not who we would vote for.

Still, it's interesting that Ron Paul is getting so many votes. I guess his strict pro-life stance is more popular than I realized.


It is just democrats trying to throw the poll.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

16 Jun 2011, 8:20 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.


Bush never called fellow Americans whom disagreed with him "the enemy." Obama has.


Again, it is "who", not "whom."


I could care less, if I choose to use "whom" instead of "who" for my style of writing, that is my business, you are not a grammar instructor. What next you going to go crazy over my comma usage? :roll:


It just goes to show how pathetic our grammar schools have become. :roll:


I'm responding to posts in a forum, I'm not writing a paper...


In a forum, poor grammar will reflect poorly on your education.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

16 Jun 2011, 8:46 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
No, we've been liberated from the Bush regime.


Bush never called fellow Americans whom disagreed with him "the enemy." Obama has.


Again, it is "who", not "whom."


I could care less, if I choose to use "whom" instead of "who" for my style of writing, that is my business, you are not a grammar instructor. What next you going to go crazy over my comma usage? :roll:


It just goes to show how pathetic our grammar schools have become. :roll:


I'm responding to posts in a forum, I'm not writing a paper...


In a forum, poor grammar will reflect poorly on your education.


:roll:

Not on a web board.