New state law to open more public buildings to firearms
Guns are easier to get from the guy on the street than the gun shop across town.
Just a thought...
If you say so. I never tried. However they are obtained, they do a superb job of killing.
Guns are easier to get from the guy on the street than the gun shop across town.
Just a thought...
If you say so. I never tried. However they are obtained, they do a superb job of killing.
The point is, only those willing to break the law will go to the guy down the street. Law abiding citizens are the only ones punished when guns are made harder to obtain. You know what this means?
... mostly criminals will have guns.
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
Fact: At most, 14% of all firearms traced in investigations were purchased at gun shows.8 But this includes all firearms that the police traced, regardless of if they were used in crimes or not, which overstates the acquisition rate.
Fact: Gun dealers are federally licensed. They are bound to stringent rules for sales that apply equally whether they are dealing from a storefront or a gun show.9
Fact: Most crime guns are either bought off the street from illegal sources (39.2%) or through family members or friends (39.6%).10
Now these are some figures that speak ear shattering volumes about why gun control doesn't work. As you can see, legislature does jack s**t to affect availability of guns in the black market. B-b-but if it keeps 7% of crooks from obtaining guns at the expense of 100% of law abiding citizens, it's totally worth it!
Guns are easier to get from the guy on the street than the gun shop across town.
Just a thought...
If you say so. I never tried. However they are obtained, they do a superb job of killing.
The point is, only those willing to break the law will go to the guy down the street. Law abiding citizens are the only ones punished when guns are made harder to obtain. You know what this means?
... mostly criminals will have guns.
Last edited by AceOfSpades on 03 Jul 2011, 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Apr 5th, 2009
Fact: Of the 43 deaths reported in this flawed study, 37 (86%) were suicides. Other deaths involved criminal activity between the family members (drug deals gone bad).1
Fact: Of the remaining deaths, the deceased family members include felons, drug dealers, violent spouses committing assault, and other criminals.2
Fact: Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the predator.3 This means you are much more likely to prevent a crime without bloodshed than hurt a family member.
That was too easy.
Apr 5th, 2009
Fact: Of the 43 deaths reported in this flawed study, 37 (86%) were suicides. Other deaths involved criminal activity between the family members (drug deals gone bad).1
Fact: Of the remaining deaths, the deceased family members include felons, drug dealers, violent spouses committing assault, and other criminals.2
Fact: Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the predator.3 This means you are much more likely to prevent a crime without bloodshed than hurt a family member.
That was too easy.
And having a gun does not encourage suicide?
guys with concealed carry permits are the least of my worries.
I'm a pacifist (in the 'just because I'm a pacifist doesn't mean i won't kick your ass if you provoke me' sense) and i own no firearms of any kind - but i don't see the point in restricting the lawful use of guns when it's criminals we're worried about.


So uhhh are you gonna address my points or what? So far I've refuted your arguments about legality affecting gun availability in the black market, pointed out what was wrong with your inclusive and vague category of "Gun deaths" and have proven the vast majority of law abiding gun owners use guns defensively rather than offensively. What do you have to say about my rebuttals?
Haha! Are we now going to ban knives and any kind of pills? How about rope?
Last edited by AceOfSpades on 03 Jul 2011, 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Haha! Are we now going to ban knives and any kind of pills? How about rope?
Okay. Let me go finish off my whiskey before we embark on this righteous crusade, k?
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
The basic point I am trying to make is something that I'm sure we all agree upon. Guns make it extremely simple and quick and easy to kill. My contention is that it is not a very bright idea to accept these advantages in blanket dispersal of arms to careless, immature, and stupid people. People can commit suicide with a sharp knitting needle or perhaps, with ingenuity a rolling pin. But this takes great effort and prolonged pain and no doubt a good deal of mess with, no doubt, second thoughts. A quick flick of the finger can and frequently does very neatly and instantly blast a hole in a vital spot with very little thought concerned. That same ease settles inflamed momentary anger, hugely enlarges possibilities for easy mistakes and finds lethal effect in children playing with an unguarded gun. These things happen with regular frequency and cannot be brushed away. You seem happy with that. I am not.
Big Brother knows best, eh?
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
I hear that a lot of veterans of our recent conflicts come home believing that most people should not be allowed to own guns.
The logic is that they are powerful and dangerous tools that require a particular level of respect, and most people are incapable or unwilling show them that respect.
The people they are referring to are not criminals but rather inept lawful owners.

Notice drowning and traffic accidents have much higher accidental death rates. Let's add swimming pools and cars to the list of things that should be banned!
Mar 27th, 2009
Basic to the debates on gun control is the fact that most violent crime is committed by repeat offenders. Dealing with recidivism is key to solving violence.
71% of gunshot victims had previous arrest records.
64% had been convicted of a crime.
Each had an average of 11 prior arrests1.
63% of victims have criminal histories and 73% of the time they know their assailant (twice as often as victims without criminal histories)2
http://www.gunmyths.com/2009/03/27/crime-and-guns/
I still wonder why I even bother.
Last edited by AceOfSpades on 03 Jul 2011, 2:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
The logic is that they are powerful and dangerous tools that require a particular level of respect, and most people are incapable or unwilling show them that respect.
The people they are referring to are not criminals but rather inept lawful owners.
I happen to personally know a few soldiers. One being my own cousin. They all stress proper training, but beyond that I have yet to come across one that thought stricter gun laws were a good idea.
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
