New state law to open more public buildings to firearms

Page 2 of 6 [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

03 Jul 2011, 12:54 am

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Sand wrote:
The point is that easily available guns kill people easily. However you classify the deaths it is the guns that make them easily available. The figures speak out very loudly and cannot be shunted aside.


Guns are easier to get from the guy on the street than the gun shop across town.

Just a thought...


If you say so. I never tried. However they are obtained, they do a superb job of killing.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Jul 2011, 12:56 am

Sand wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Sand wrote:
The point is that easily available guns kill people easily. However you classify the deaths it is the guns that make them easily available. The figures speak out very loudly and cannot be shunted aside.


Guns are easier to get from the guy on the street than the gun shop across town.

Just a thought...


If you say so. I never tried. However they are obtained, they do a superb job of killing.


The point is, only those willing to break the law will go to the guy down the street. Law abiding citizens are the only ones punished when guns are made harder to obtain. You know what this means?

... mostly criminals will have guns.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

03 Jul 2011, 12:57 am

Sand wrote:
The point is that easily available guns kill people easily. However you classify the deaths it is the guns that make them easily available. The figures speak out very loudly and cannot be shunted aside.
And your point is? What the hell do you mean by however I classify deaths? We are clearly talking about gun homicides so everything else is irrelevant and must be ruled out.

Quote:
Fact: 93% of guns used in crimes are obtained illegally (i.e., not at gun stores or gun shows).7

Fact: At most, 14% of all firearms traced in investigations were purchased at gun shows.8 But this includes all firearms that the police traced, regardless of if they were used in crimes or not, which overstates the acquisition rate.

Fact: Gun dealers are federally licensed. They are bound to stringent rules for sales that apply equally whether they are dealing from a storefront or a gun show.9

Fact: Most crime guns are either bought off the street from illegal sources (39.2%) or through family members or friends (39.6%).10
http://www.gunmyths.com/2009/01/04/myth-gun-shows-are-supermarkets-for-criminals/#fn-296-10

Now these are some figures that speak ear shattering volumes about why gun control doesn't work. As you can see, legislature does jack s**t to affect availability of guns in the black market. B-b-but if it keeps 7% of crooks from obtaining guns at the expense of 100% of law abiding citizens, it's totally worth it!

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Sand wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Sand wrote:
The point is that easily available guns kill people easily. However you classify the deaths it is the guns that make them easily available. The figures speak out very loudly and cannot be shunted aside.


Guns are easier to get from the guy on the street than the gun shop across town.

Just a thought...


If you say so. I never tried. However they are obtained, they do a superb job of killing.


The point is, only those willing to break the law will go to the guy down the street. Law abiding citizens are the only ones punished when guns are made harder to obtain. You know what this means?

... mostly criminals will have guns.
Trust me, he still won't get it. I don't even know why I even bother.



Last edited by AceOfSpades on 03 Jul 2011, 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

03 Jul 2011, 1:08 am

Sand wrote:
That's right, don't address my points. Not like I've ever heard this statistically skewed myth before:

Quote:
Another problem with keeping guns in the home is that they are more likely to kill a family member or friend than an intruder.

Quote:
Myth: Handguns are 43 times more likely to kill a family member than a criminal
Apr 5th, 2009

Fact: Of the 43 deaths reported in this flawed study, 37 (86%) were suicides. Other deaths involved criminal activity between the family members (drug deals gone bad).1

Fact: Of the remaining deaths, the deceased family members include felons, drug dealers, violent spouses committing assault, and other criminals.2

Fact: Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the predator.3 This means you are much more likely to prevent a crime without bloodshed than hurt a family member.
http://www.gunmyths.com/2009/04/05/myth-handguns-are-43-times-more-likely-to-kill-a-family-member-than-a-criminal/

That was too easy.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

03 Jul 2011, 1:10 am

AceOfSpades wrote:
Sand wrote:
That's right, don't address my points. Not like I've ever heard this statistically skewed myth before:

Quote:
Another problem with keeping guns in the home is that they are more likely to kill a family member or friend than an intruder.

Quote:
Myth: Handguns are 43 times more likely to kill a family member than a criminal
Apr 5th, 2009

Fact: Of the 43 deaths reported in this flawed study, 37 (86%) were suicides. Other deaths involved criminal activity between the family members (drug deals gone bad).1

Fact: Of the remaining deaths, the deceased family members include felons, drug dealers, violent spouses committing assault, and other criminals.2

Fact: Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the predator.3 This means you are much more likely to prevent a crime without bloodshed than hurt a family member.
http://www.gunmyths.com/2009/04/05/myth-handguns-are-43-times-more-likely-to-kill-a-family-member-than-a-criminal/

That was too easy.


And having a gun does not encourage suicide?



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Jul 2011, 1:24 am

Sand wrote:
And having a gun does not encourage suicide?


Haha! Are we now going to ban knives and any kind of pills? How about rope?


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Jul 2011, 1:28 am

AceOfSpades wrote:
Trust me, he still won't get it. I don't even know why I even bother.


What can I say, I'm in a futile mood.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

03 Jul 2011, 1:34 am

guys with concealed carry permits are the least of my worries.

I'm a pacifist (in the 'just because I'm a pacifist doesn't mean i won't kick your ass if you provoke me' sense) and i own no firearms of any kind - but i don't see the point in restricting the lawful use of guns when it's criminals we're worried about.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

03 Jul 2011, 1:43 am

Sand wrote:
And having a gun does not encourage suicide?

AceOfSpades wrote:
We are clearly talking about gun homicides so everything else is irrelevant and must be ruled out.
What's up with the sudden change of subject? You have nothing to refute my points with? Wasn't the discussion initially about guns being used to kill others? Besides there is no correlation between suicides committed with firearms and the overall suicide rate because you know, if there's a will there's a way. If there's no guns around, the person will just find another way to kill himself/herself.

Image
Image
So uhhh are you gonna address my points or what? So far I've refuted your arguments about legality affecting gun availability in the black market, pointed out what was wrong with your inclusive and vague category of "Gun deaths" and have proven the vast majority of law abiding gun owners use guns defensively rather than offensively. What do you have to say about my rebuttals?

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Sand wrote:
And having a gun does not encourage suicide?


Haha! Are we now going to ban knives and any kind of pills? How about rope?
Let's ban booze too! Oh wait, we all know how well that worked out during Prohibition :roll:



Last edited by AceOfSpades on 03 Jul 2011, 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Jul 2011, 1:46 am

AceOfSpades wrote:

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Sand wrote:
And having a gun does not encourage suicide?


Haha! Are we now going to ban knives and any kind of pills? How about rope?
Let's ban booze too! Oh wait, we all know how well that worked out during Prohibition :roll:


Okay. Let me go finish off my whiskey before we embark on this righteous crusade, k?


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

03 Jul 2011, 1:50 am

The basic point I am trying to make is something that I'm sure we all agree upon. Guns make it extremely simple and quick and easy to kill. My contention is that it is not a very bright idea to accept these advantages in blanket dispersal of arms to careless, immature, and stupid people. People can commit suicide with a sharp knitting needle or perhaps, with ingenuity a rolling pin. But this takes great effort and prolonged pain and no doubt a good deal of mess with, no doubt, second thoughts. A quick flick of the finger can and frequently does very neatly and instantly blast a hole in a vital spot with very little thought concerned. That same ease settles inflamed momentary anger, hugely enlarges possibilities for easy mistakes and finds lethal effect in children playing with an unguarded gun. These things happen with regular frequency and cannot be brushed away. You seem happy with that. I am not.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Jul 2011, 2:05 am

Sand wrote:
The basic point I am trying to make is something that I'm sure we all agree upon. Guns make it extremely simple and quick and easy to kill. My contention is that it is not a very bright idea to accept these advantages in blanket dispersal of arms to careless, immature, and stupid people. People can commit suicide with a sharp knitting needle or perhaps, with ingenuity a rolling pin. But this takes great effort and prolonged pain and no doubt a good deal of mess with, no doubt, second thoughts. A quick flick of the finger can and frequently does very neatly and instantly blast a hole in a vital spot with very little thought concerned. That same ease settles inflamed momentary anger, hugely enlarges possibilities for easy mistakes and finds lethal effect in children playing with an unguarded gun. These things happen with regular frequency and cannot be brushed away. You seem happy with that. I am not.


Big Brother knows best, eh? :wink:


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

03 Jul 2011, 2:13 am

I hear that a lot of veterans of our recent conflicts come home believing that most people should not be allowed to own guns.

The logic is that they are powerful and dangerous tools that require a particular level of respect, and most people are incapable or unwilling show them that respect.

The people they are referring to are not criminals but rather inept lawful owners.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

03 Jul 2011, 2:15 am

Sand wrote:
The basic point I am trying to make is something that I'm sure we all agree upon. Guns make it extremely simple and quick and easy to kill.
And making them illegal hasn't stopped that from happening, but it has certainly stopped law abiding citizens from having them to defend themselves with.

Sand wrote:
My contention is that it is not a very bright idea to accept these advantages in blanket dispersal of arms to careless, immature, and stupid people.
Prove that the vast majority of gun owners are stupid, careless and immature. Only 0.8% of gun deaths are attributable to accidental discharge
Image
Notice drowning and traffic accidents have much higher accidental death rates. Let's add swimming pools and cars to the list of things that should be banned!

Sand wrote:
People can commit suicide with a sharp knitting needle or perhaps, with ingenuity a rolling pin. But this takes great effort and prolonged pain and no doubt a good deal of mess with, no doubt, second thoughts.
It still hasn't affected the overall suicide rate, so looks like taking away one means of suicide isn't a deal breaker for them.

Sand wrote:
A quick flick of the finger can and frequently does very neatly and instantly blast a hole in a vital spot with very little thought concerned. That same ease settles inflamed momentary anger, hugely enlarges possibilities for easy mistakes and finds lethal effect in children playing with an unguarded gun. These things happen with regular frequency and cannot be brushed away. You seem happy with that. I am not.
Regular frequency my ass, accidental discharge is less than 1% of gun deaths. I love how you are grasping at straws by accusing me of being happy about children being dead. How did I know you would resort to emotional rhetoric? Also, people who usually end up shooting people in anger are usually habitually violent and live a criminal lifestyle so once again your distrust in the average person is irrational:
Quote:
Crime and Guns
Mar 27th, 2009

Basic to the debates on gun control is the fact that most violent crime is committed by repeat offenders. Dealing with recidivism is key to solving violence.

71% of gunshot victims had previous arrest records.

64% had been convicted of a crime.

Each had an average of 11 prior arrests1.

63% of victims have criminal histories and 73% of the time they know their assailant (twice as often as victims without criminal histories)2

http://www.gunmyths.com/2009/03/27/crime-and-guns/
I still wonder why I even bother.



Last edited by AceOfSpades on 03 Jul 2011, 2:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Jul 2011, 2:17 am

blauSamstag wrote:
I hear that a lot of veterans of our recent conflicts come home believing that most people should not be allowed to own guns.

The logic is that they are powerful and dangerous tools that require a particular level of respect, and most people are incapable or unwilling show them that respect.

The people they are referring to are not criminals but rather inept lawful owners.


I happen to personally know a few soldiers. One being my own cousin. They all stress proper training, but beyond that I have yet to come across one that thought stricter gun laws were a good idea.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.