I am officially distubed by the truth of U.S healthcare.
I am just a little worried about the fact that I will pretty much be left to die if I suffer any sort of serious injuries or anything. Expendable lower class I guess.
The reality of health care is that it's not an unlimited resource, all healthcare is is the work of a doctor, a chemist, a biologist. Many people don't understand why health care costs are so high in this country, it didn't used to be like this, before medicare was introduced. The reason is people are able to bid up costs with money that isn't theirs and so there is no limit to the price increases. All socialism does is increase the level of inflation in the industry - increasing the burdon on society.
So we might complain that the cost of an MRI is too expensive, but few people stop and appreciate the MRI, it's a marvel of technology, people don't appreciate the fact that if they had come down with some illness just 10 or 15 years prior that machine wouldn't have even been there for them to complain about. profit necessitated it into existence - it is profit which nearly all advances in the medical profession has come. Without profit there is no progress. That is the disturbing truth.
Yeah, but in Japan, that MRI costs about $700.
Part of that is the fact that they don't insist on having the world's absolute best MRI machine. They have a Good MRI machine. The Best MRI machine is maybe 0.5% better.
And again, I never hear my canadian friends complain about socialized healthcare.
Indeed.
I bolded the blatant myths. The US system continually ranks below other nations with socialized care with regards to, quality of care, access to care, and cost per capita (as well as cost per GDP). On average, we pay 2-3 times what they do. Profits don't lead to progress here, they lead to greed. They lead to a system that functions by reducing claim payouts and increasing revenue in order to increase those profits.

The incorrect assumption you make is that the U.S. is a free market, I am well aware the costs are less in other countries. We have something worse than socialism in this country, its a system which favors corperate interests. Also cost per citizen isn't the only measure to determine how good a medical system is. I would instead look at how much progress is made in new procedures and medicines that are pattented, it's a subjective metric to a large extent, but one we can all sort of approach an agreement to.
Many countries steal the work of the United States. for instance many patented gene therepy medications with great medical benefit are manufactured and dispersed without the consent of the developer because some governments have found them to be unjustly expensive. What's not realized in many cases are the billions upon billions of dollars necessary to develop the medication. So these companies respond by setting up lobbying organizations all over the world. These lobbys cost the pharmaceutical company billions of dollars worldwide as well, and their main purpose is to maintain enforcement of international patent laws. The costs of these lobbys further raise the cost of medications.
If you disperse the medications without profit, there is no money to pursue further research. I agree not all progress comes from profit, but most of it does.
How much do you suppose the cost per person would be without medicare? Take a look at figures before 1950
The gap narrows going back 1995, that was about 30 years after the introduction of medicare.
www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=8948&type=1
On the page titled "Historical Growth in Health Care Spending", 1965 to 2005
You'll see that since modern Medicare the inflation adjusted costs for medicare more than tripled. Before medicare, the costs were no higher than other developing countries.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Personally, I think you're one hundred percent right. How can a country like ours that claims to have Christian values do this to people in need? Crimony, poorer counties than ours provide healthcare for their citizens.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Oh noes not the wrath, besides I will have to put up with a lot of it outside of here as well. But yes that is a good point, I am not a christain but sometimes I feel like I am more of a christain than most christians just because I really do belive in all that stuff about treating others how you want to be treated and helping people out when they need it I just don't have religious philosophy attatched to it.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
My reality? that is just how our healthcare system works.......no money=little or no medical treatment. And as someone who has seen the benifits of our supposed system(medicaid) for those low income people it is s**t many places don't accept it, the treatment is not adequete at all and I could find pleanty more that is wrong with it.
It hurts you that 45 million people do not have health insurance(some of which are young like myself and simply don't care), but it doesn't seem to bother you one iota the hundreds of millions more in the lower and middle class who can afford expensive health care, and haven't seen their wages rise in a decade because of the increasing percentage of their checks that go to pay for this expensive system. The overwhelming majority of which struggle with mortgages, bills to pay, families to raise, kids to put through college, and many of the other things that come with living in the middle and lower classes, all the while burdened by the costs of health care. It is one of the largest roadblocks to upward mobility, and for the lower class moving into the middle class.
Actually if we had a good universal healthcare system (not what Obama was suggesting that was a joke compared to actual universal healthcare) but more simular to what they have in Canada, or England or even France I might have a chance of getting medical treatment if I where to need it......without having more than I even have taken from me. And how many of these low class people do you think can afford expensive healthcare, most of them can't actually. There would be less of a burden if we had a better healthcare system.
You are compassionate for the minorities, the 45 million, or 15% of America, we are compassionate for the majority, or 255 million, or 85%, and feel that the 15% that you fight for would be better off under our system wherein fighting costs will make health care affordable to everyone and the issues you bring up rendered a non-issue. You are not more moral or compassionate then the side you detest... at the end of the day, someone will suffer anyways, and we stand with 255 million people who go through similar issues as those you claim to defend but we do not go about complaining how much this country sucks, and how institutionally evil you are for not caring about the other 255 million people in this nation.
Don't tell me who I am compassionate for and who I am not compassionate for, I am compassionate for everyone and I think the healthcare system we have is all about profit just like everything else in this goddamn country.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I am just a little worried about the fact that I will pretty much be left to die if I suffer any sort of serious injuries or anything. Expendable lower class I guess.
watching 1 propaganda film and then making a decision is not really informed.
look at both sides before you decide.
Thank you so much for assuming I am basing my entire opinion on one documentary......yeah not propaganda film but documentary were they guy actually investigated and found some really intresting things. I have also had pleanty of personal experiances that suggest our healthcare system sucks and I have disliked the idea of health insurance companies as soon as I discovered they are kind of all about profit and not really helping people...this isen't someting I just decided on based on one film. And there were interviews with the 'other' side as well and many of them have no problem discussing these matters as if its simple buisness and nothing more....people are expendable.
But yeah I base my opinions on much information so take you're obnoxious assumptions somewhere else.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
You mean those rich bankers at Goldman Sachs and other banks who contributed four times as much to Obama as to McCain? Yes, I'd agree that they contributed to the problematic class warfare that Obama advocates, and also to that travesty of a health care system he pushed and passed.
Want a good health care system? Get the federal government out of it and get your state to pass reasonable rules - or move to such a state. Prior to Obamacare, my state prohibited refusal of people for medical conditions provided they had maintained continuous insurance. It's only in disfunctional places like California that you could be kicked off an existing plan because of conditions you developed under that plan.
How about get big buisness out of the damn healthcare system, who do you think pays people like Obama? and Obamacare does not=Universal Healthcare. Also what about people that have a condition before they apply for insurance.......oh yeah denied, they would not want to lose money over actually having to help someone pay for their treatment that would be a financial tragedy. But yeah what are people with a pre-existing condition who don't get approved for SSI fro instance supposed to do?
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
According to you healthcare doomsayers, he will be denied care and thrown to the streets.
But he has NEVER been denied treatment. He has gone through several rounds of chemo. He has had a bone marrow transplant that hospitalized him for months. He has been to the Rochester Mayo Clinic. He is receiving a ton of medications. He has been hospitalized multiple times for long periods. He sees doctors practically daily.
You guys should probably stop watching Michael Moore films.
Fine attack the film I watched.....I don't agree with all that guys biases, but I have a hard time beliving everything in that documentary was falisified especially when I have seen some of the things discussed.
My dad had a knee injury when I was maybe 8 years old, and he still has the knee injury was unable to afford ever getting it properly taken care of because he did not have insurance or anything. luckily it was just a knee and not his back or something that would have completely put him out of work.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I am just a little worried about the fact that I will pretty much be left to die if I suffer any sort of serious injuries or anything. Expendable lower class I guess.
The reality of health care is that it's not an unlimited resource, all healthcare is is the work of a doctor, a chemist, a biologist. Many people don't understand why health care costs are so high in this country, it didn't used to be like this, before medicare was introduced. The reason is people are able to bid up costs with money that isn't theirs and so there is no limit to the price increases. All socialism does is increase the level of inflation in the industry - increasing the burdon on society.
So we might complain that the cost of an MRI is too expensive, but few people stop and appreciate the MRI, it's a marvel of technology, people don't appreciate the fact that if they had come down with some illness just 10 or 15 years prior that machine wouldn't have even been there for them to complain about. profit necessitated it into existence - it is profit which nearly all advances in the medical profession has come. Without profit there is no progress. That is the disturbing truth.
Maybe you should look into how universal healthcare works in other countries.......a lot of stuff you hear about how it's underfunded, everyone has to wait months and months for any care, it's inadequete ect is BS. I mean why is U.S healthcare ranked so low in the world, why are their poorer countries with citizens who enjoy longer lifespans? think about it. Also there should be more to life than profit.......people matter more then money I should think, but not according to our healthcare system. Its disgusting that people think its Ok that it works that way.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Lol if things are so wonderful in the U.S why are we ranked at 50 as far as lifespan goes?...that is right people in 49 countries even contries poorer then the U.S have a longer life expectancy than we do. Don't believe me?
https://www.cia.gov/library/publication ... 2rank.html
see for yourself.
Healthcare in this nation is atrocious. We have the technology available to treat many conditions yet people have no access to them. Obviously, when it comes to healthcare, the free market system does not work. There is obviously a demand for affordable medical care. You would think the free market would cause care costs to lower as a result and competition to take place. But it doesn't.
I noticed that hospitals are rarely built in low income communities. Hospitals prefer to built themselves where people have higher income. There is one town with about 50,000 people living there. It is a very poor area. They have one hospital that is over 50 years old. In the more affluent town up the highway, with only 38,000 people they have over three hospitals and another brand new one being built.
This is why I seriously doubt Capitalism will work when it comes to medicine. Medicine, like education, is too loosely defined to directly obey the laws of supply and demand like consumer goods would. The demand for medicine can fluctuate or disappear after treatment (which gives the medical industry a reason to keep people on medicines they don't necessarily need).
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I do not think there are many former slaves still living, so I am not sure how that exactly would tie in.
Poverty affects all races and backgrounds. But you are right in stating that people who have dark pigmented skin are affected disproportionally to other races.
If poor people cannot afford expensive medicine and if many "black people" are poor then many "black people" cannot afford medicine.
I do not think there are many former slaves still living, so I am not sure how that exactly would tie in.
I'm sure you would have difficulty figuring it out. But that's not my problem now is it?
Other nations are better than the US just with respect to cost. They beat us in quality, access, and life expectancy too. The pharmaceutical clusterf*uck is a separate issue. But do I think U.S. pharma companies are innocent players in all this - no way, but again, separate issue.
The problem with health insurance via private corporations, even though not purely free market, is that their sole function is profit. There is a blatant conflict of interest between the interests of the insurance company and the interests of the patient. The basic business model is sales up + costs down = success, or with health insurance, premiums up + claims down = success. This does not serve patients well. Healthcare should not be a commodity. Other countries have figured this out. The free market is simply not a solution when it comes to peoples health and lives. It works great for clothing and furniture, but not for human beings.
Hrrmm...
First you say that the reason healtcare costs are high is because of a move to "socialist" healthcare (ie - medicaid).
Then you say it's not socialsit... it's worse... It's a system that favours corporate interests... and which allows drug costs to increase unchecked... in other words: free market capitalism.
I can see how that would be confused with socialism. lol.
Other nations are better than the US just with respect to cost. They beat us in quality, access, and life expectancy too. The pharmaceutical clusterf*uck is a separate issue. But do I think U.S. pharma companies are innocent players in all this - no way, but again, separate issue.
The problem with health insurance via private corporations, even though not purely free market, is that their sole function is profit. There is a blatant conflict of interest between the interests of the insurance company and the interests of the patient. The basic business model is sales up + costs down = success, or with health insurance, premiums up + claims down = success. This does not serve patients well. Healthcare should not be a commodity. Other countries have figured this out. The free market is simply not a solution when it comes to peoples health and lives. It works great for clothing and furniture, but not for human beings.
Many other nations have a lower retirement age and a smaller work week... The stats given are quite frankly bogus because they are assuming that everyone has the same contributing factors, when they don't.
We don't have a free market healthcare system, it is a Government/Corporate mess, and it will only get worse with Obamacare.
You people want to start yelling about corporations and taxes, how about they start by getting General Electric to pay its taxes, oh but that's apparently okay because they give to Democrats.
