Page 2 of 2 [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Lecks
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,987
Location: Belgium

07 Sep 2011, 8:32 am

ruveyn wrote:
Which is better. Trying to fix a rat infest rotting barn, or tearing it down and building a new barn right and proper?

ruveyn

To be a smartass: get rid of the rats first, then tear down the barn and rebuild.


_________________
Chances are, if you're offended by something I said, it was an attempt at humour.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Sep 2011, 9:57 am

Lecks wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Which is better. Trying to fix a rat infest rotting barn, or tearing it down and building a new barn right and proper?

ruveyn

To be a smartass: get rid of the rats first, then tear down the barn and rebuild.


Whatever. But the barn must be rebuilt from the ground up.

ruveyn



Bloviater
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 54

07 Sep 2011, 10:45 am

ruveyn wrote:
The Downfall and Doom of every democracy occurs when the politicians raid the public treasury to fund programs that will get them votes. Once that is done, it is just a matter of time before the government and probably the society comes unglued.

A welfare state is a luxury we cannot afford.

Yes, maintain the infrastructure. Yes, maintain public hygene (clean water and waste disposal). Yes, maintain public order. No, do not subsidize deadbeats and corrupt players.

ruveyn

Bwahahahaha....you actually expect the government to stop bailing out the very corporations and banks that fill their campaign coffers? Cute. :lol:



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

07 Sep 2011, 10:53 am

ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:
And we would be better off plunged into a second Great Depression due to a massive run on the banks where 30% of the population lose both their job and their life savings. We could go back to the days of the 19th century "Great Panics". You're better off keeping all your money under your f***ing mattress than leaving it with the sleaze balls. That's some old school capitalism for ya.


Which is better. Trying to fix a rat infest rotting barn, or tearing it down and building a new barn right and proper?

ruveyn

It will never be right and proper as long as greedy sleaze balls are in charge.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Sep 2011, 10:55 am

Bloviater wrote:
Bwahahahaha....you actually expect the government to stop bailing out the very corporations and banks that fill their campaign coffers? Cute. :lol:


For better or for worse we still decide our political fate with a vote. It is within the realm of possibility (perhaps just barely) that folks of this nation will extract their heads from their anuses and vote in a better bunch).

It is either that or bloody revolution.

ruveyn



Last edited by ruveyn on 07 Sep 2011, 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

07 Sep 2011, 10:55 am

ruveyn wrote:
The Downfall and Doom of every democracy occurs when the politicians raid the public treasury to fund programs that will get them votes. Once that is done, it is just a matter of time before the government and probably the society comes unglued.

A welfare state is a luxury we cannot afford.

Yes, maintain the infrastructure. Yes, maintain public hygene (clean water and waste disposal). Yes, maintain public order. No, do not subsidize deadbeats and corrupt players.

ruveyn


As that ALWAYS happens then democracy is always doomed. When in the '50s our ultra-conservative Quebec government was infamous for fixing the roads in the districts that voted for them and not in those that voted liberal, that's an example of this.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

07 Sep 2011, 10:57 am

If welfare states were affordable in the '60s when the economies were less than half what they are now then they certainly are now. I mean, what of this automation, this technology, this added efficiency? The bosses seem to think it's OK to waste trillions of dollars of production with the artificial NAIRU Reserve Army of Labour thank you very much Milton Friedman.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

07 Sep 2011, 11:01 am

zer0netgain wrote:
marshall wrote:
And we would be better off plunged into a second Great Depression due to a massive run on the banks where 30% of the population lose both their job and their life savings. We could go back to the days of the 19th century "Great Panics". You're better off keeping all your money under your f***ing mattress than leaving it with the sleaze balls. That's some old school capitalism for ya.


You do realize that the "Great Depression" was engineered to happen by the uber wealthy to create a problem that would mandate their "Great Society" solution, right?

Banks were solid. We gave control of monetary policy to a group of private bankers who immediately ran things into the ground so that the public would agree to "reforms" that would otherwise be unconscionable.


Solid my ass. Why should I bother arguing with idiot tin-foil hatters? Also, please prove that the 19th century was all peachy and rosy.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

07 Sep 2011, 11:11 am

ruveyn wrote:
Bloviater wrote:
Bwahahahaha....you actually expect the government to stop bailing out the very corporations and banks that fill their campaign coffers? Cute. :lol:

For better or for worse we still decide our political fate with a vote. It is within the realm of possibility (perhaps just barely) that folks of this nation will extract their heads from their anuses and vote in a better bunch).

It is either that or bloody revolution.

There won't be a revolution. There will be riots and mayham. Nobody will admit that it isn't the politicians or even government that's the problem. It's the dumb idiot masses.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

07 Sep 2011, 11:12 am

ruveyn wrote:
Bloviater wrote:
Bwahahahaha....you actually expect the government to stop bailing out the very corporations and banks that fill their campaign coffers? Cute. :lol:


For better or for worse we still decide our political fate with a vote. It is within the realm of possibility (perhaps just barely) that folks of this nation will extract their heads from their anuses and vote in a better bunch).

It is either that or bloody revolution.

ruveyn


Not really, its not like who we vote for changes who pays them....and voting for president does not change anything because that office does not have much power at all.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

10 Sep 2011, 6:19 am

zer0netgain wrote:
marshall wrote:
And we would be better off plunged into a second Great Depression due to a massive run on the banks where 30% of the population lose both their job and their life savings. We could go back to the days of the 19th century "Great Panics". You're better off keeping all your money under your f***ing mattress than leaving it with the sleaze balls. That's some old school capitalism for ya.


You do realize that the "Great Depression" was engineered to happen by the uber wealthy to create a problem that would mandate their "Great Society" solution, right?

Banks were solid. We gave control of monetary policy to a group of private bankers who immediately ran things into the ground so that the public would agree to "reforms" that would otherwise be unconscionable.


Do you actually believe that?

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer