06 Oct 2011, 5:02 pm
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
I don't think a third party would get very far in 2012, though the Dems would want one to split the vote so their Anointed One gets re-elected.
Have you ever noticed that most Liberals are very disappointed in Obama?
Have you Noticed that most of your rhetoric does not reflect reality?
Doesn't matter if they are disappointed they will still vote for Obama whom is a leftist ideologue over anyone the Republicans nominate.
Again with the "leftist ideologue" is there a Marxist running?
Does anyone really buy that?
Yes, of course there is a marxist running, Barack H. Obama is a marxist/socialist, the fact he hasn't been able to get all his agenda pushed through is the fact some Democrats even balked at his agenda.
@ Joker
If Obama was right wing, Obamacare would have been vetoed. Republicans dismissed the mandate idea years ago, believing it to be unconstitutional.
What color is the sky where you live?
How do you expect people to take you or your views serious when you say stuff like that?
That's our Orwell
06 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
06 Oct 2011, 5:09 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
06 Oct 2011, 5:10 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
Facts indicate that Obama is a socialist.
That's really all I can even say. Just .
06 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
number5 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Facts indicate that Obama is a socialist.
That's really all I can even say. Just .Welcome... to the Inuverse.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
06 Oct 2011, 5:14 pm
Conservatives and Republicans are reverse socialists which means instead of spreading the wealth around they rather have the rich get all the money
06 Oct 2011, 5:17 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
06 Oct 2011, 5:19 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding
Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
06 Oct 2011, 5:22 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Good one I love that statement
its so true belive it or not though conservatives do the opposite they take but never give which goes against the 48 laws of power.
06 Oct 2011, 5:22 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Actually, Obama is still a socialist, because government is determining the winners and losers, also he's giving his supporters (like the unions) kickbacks.
06 Oct 2011, 5:22 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Socialism has a deeper and more specific definition than spreading the wealth.
Maybe this could be a discussion.
06 Oct 2011, 5:25 pm
JakobVirgil wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Socialism has a deeper and more specific definition than spreading the wealth.
Maybe this could be a discussion.
Was referring to Rayleigh scattering.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
06 Oct 2011, 5:38 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Actually, Obama is still a socialist, because government is determining the winners and losers, also he's giving his supporters (like the unions) kickbacks.
The government does that any way weather they are socialist or not lad
06 Oct 2011, 5:41 pm
Joker wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Actually, Obama is still a socialist, because government is determining the winners and losers, also he's giving his supporters (like the unions) kickbacks.
The government does that any way weather they are socialist or not lad
It wasn't to this degree until Obama became President.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
06 Oct 2011, 5:49 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
Joker wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Actually, Obama is still a socialist, because government is determining the winners and losers, also he's giving his supporters (like the unions) kickbacks.
The government does that any way weather they are socialist or not lad
It wasn't to this degree until Obama became President.
Bush did that too
06 Oct 2011, 5:50 pm
JakobVirgil wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
(there is a more scientific term that I can't recall off the top of my head)
Rayleigh Scattering, or "Intelligent Diffraction" ?
Thank you, wasn't going to look it up because it wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Also "Spread the wealth around" is a socialist platform.
So you are a supporter of Intelligent Diffraction. I suppose you want to teach the controversy as well...
just kidding Spreading the wealth around is only socialist if the wealth isn't being spread between rich guys
Socialism has a deeper and more specific definition than spreading the wealth.
Maybe this could be a discussion.
True. "Obama as a Marxist", for example, is flawed; that would imply he is supporting state owned means of production with a single-party government and a completely planned economy...
