ACLU

Page 2 of 2 [ 28 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

10 Oct 2011, 2:10 am

Dox47 wrote:

JakobVirgil wrote:

But I do reserve the right to shot any home invader regardless of the presence of a shiny badge.
(I do observe warrants)

Well that's just common sense, I mean anyone can buy a badge or a jacket that says FBI on it. What was it G. Gordon Liddy said, "if the jacket says fed then aim for the head"? No need for fancy shooting in my case, I've usually got something handy that won't even slow down for kevlar.

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

10 Oct 2011, 2:39 am

^
Oh the irony. Is it really that tough to embed an image properly?

_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez

blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

10 Oct 2011, 2:41 am

I don't actually care.

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

10 Oct 2011, 3:32 am

Of course you don't.

_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

10 Oct 2011, 7:40 am

JakobVirgil wrote:

minervx wrote:

Have they done everything possible to defend terrorists?

and other people whose rights have been denied them.

In neither case have they done "everything possible". The ACLU people pick and chose their cases carefully. The ACLU types are for the most part, pinko stinko Liberals.

ruveyn

Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

10 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm

ruveyn wrote:

JakobVirgil wrote:

minervx wrote:

Have they done everything possible to defend terrorists?

and other people whose rights have been denied them.

In neither case have they done "everything possible". The ACLU people pick and chose their cases carefully. The ACLU types are for the most part, pinko stinko Liberals.

ruveyn

Actually the ACLU will defend anyone whom isn't White, Christian, and/or Jewish. They have been perfectly okay when civil rights violations happen and the victim is a white Christian or a white Jewish Person.

visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

11 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm

Inuyasha wrote:

Utter and complete falsehood.

How about the ACLU involvement in Skokie--a community with a majority Jewish population--and their attempt to ban neo-Nazi marches?
The ACLU defended Oliver North. A white (and possibly Christian) man.
The ACLU defended Frank Snepp. Another white (and possibly Christian) man.
The ACLU defended the Christian athletes at Floyd County High School
The ACLU defended the WBC. Shirley Phelps-Roper is most assuredly white and Christian.
The ACLU even filed an amicus brief in defence of Rush Limbaugh!

The ACLU stands for the admirable position that civil rights are for everyone--not just the people that believe and behave the way government wants them to.

_________________
--James

Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

11 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm

visagrunt wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

If you are going to make those claims please provide sources.

Scythe
Blue Jay

Joined: 6 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 99
Location: Rio Rancho

11 Oct 2011, 2:21 pm

I heard a lot of assumes and possible.

On rare occasions does the ACLU go out of their typical range of people they "help" and its usually to back up a liberal idea. If something attains to a conservative stand point they stay away from it like its the plaque. They stand for what they perceive to be right in their eyes. The law and any other idea as to what is fair does not mean anything to them.

Also I noticed their extreme attraction to large amounts of money they get from suing everyone. If I got a couple million every time I went after a "Civil" cause I would sue everyone around me to I guess. If you ask me their motives seem a little green.

ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

11 Oct 2011, 3:54 pm

"Guns don't kill people, but they sure as hell up the body count."

_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."

JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

11 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm

Scythe wrote:

Pro bono lawyer sure is a way to make the green.

_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/

visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

12 Oct 2011, 11:54 am

Inuyasha wrote:

visagrunt wrote:

Inuyasha wrote:

Utter and complete falsehood.

How about the ACLU involvement in Skokie--a community with a majority Jewish population--and their attempt to ban neo-Nazi marches?
National Socialist Party v. Skokie 432 U.S. 42 (1977)[b]. If you are a subscriber to WestLaw, you can read the ACLU brief (docket number 76-1786)

The ACLU defended Oliver North. A white (and possibly Christian) man.
[b]http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/21/us/civil-liberties-union-asks-court-to-quash-iran-contra-indictment.html

The ACLU defended Frank Snepp. Another white (and possibly Christian) man.
Snepp v. United States 444 U.S. 507 (1980). (Docket 78-1871, 79-265 if you want to read the brief on Westlaw)

The ACLU defended the Christian athletes at Floyd County High School.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/virginia-students-fight-back-after-high-school-bans-religious-messages-on-lockers-ncxdc-030111

The ACLU defended the WBC. Shirley Phelps-Roper is most assuredly white and Christian.
Snyder v. Phelps (Docket 09-751. http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx ... 09-751.htm)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00643.html

The ACLU even filed an amicus brief in defence of Rush Limbaugh!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html

The ACLU stands for the admirable position that civil rights are for everyone--not just the people that believe and behave the way government wants them to.

If you are going to make those claims please provide sources.

By all means.

Just because I'm arguing with you doesn't mean that I'm not going to come prepared.

_________________
--James

Page 2 of 2 [ 28 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Jump to:

ACLU Post Reply New Topic

ACLU