http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/20/technol ... mous_hack/
"Hacker group Anonymous is a nuisance, not a threat" says the writer of the headline.
My response: closing down a damn file sharing site is a nuisance, not a threat. The fact that Anonymous has never actually done anything truly destructive is that they have never HAD a legitimate cause to do so. Some think they have, but nah, most of their causes so far have been pretty two-bit. In spite of its flaws, we still live in a mostly free country, unlike Egypt under Mubarak. If those government stooges think their little organizations would be invulnerable to pissed-off activists if we had a Mubarak running things, they are deluding themselves and are full of crap.
Anonymous is somewhat ineffectual largely because there is little need for them, and THANK GOD FOR THAT. To keep it that way, we have to make sure that idiotic bills like SOPA and PIPA never pass into law, period.
As for how much I care about an idiotic file-sharing site being raided and shut down by the FBI, I don't. They hanged themselves. Hell, the people who were running the gig are still set for life, even if they do time in prison. If they've horded the proceeds of their crime in a bunch of offshore bank accounts, they'll still be rich once they're released. If the authorities think that this stunt will be a deterrent, they are simply freaking stupid.
The only thing that could ever eliminate file-sharing would be for it to become social malapropos, and that is the ONLY way it would ever dwindle. When we have decided, as a culture, that file-swapping is cheesy, cheap, VULGAR and ignorant, hardly anyone would want to do it anymore. The only thing that motivates people to do file-swapping right now is that it's the anti-establishment thing to do, BECAUSE THE FOOL ESTABLISHMENT HAS MADE A CAUSE OUT OF IT. They're doing it to themselves.