Why do Neo-Marxists hate the "New Atheists"?

Page 2 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

26 Jan 2012, 1:32 am

Dox47 wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
... nothing but flowery, unverifiable, literary critic nonsense and tangential ramblings.


Sounds like most of PPR in a nutshell to me... :lol:


Hi Dox47,

Have you tried: "SOTU: Dumbed down and recycled" for the "again rated at an 8th grade comprehension level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test" to see if that helps???:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt187940.html

Tadzio



Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

26 Jan 2012, 2:16 am

Fnord wrote:
abacacus wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Because "Neo-Atheists" do not need Communism to tell them what not to believe in - they can think for themselves, which is anathema to secular religions like Communism.
Communism isn't a religion, it is a system of economics and government.

I said secular religion - a fanatical belief system that is mostly faith-based, yet does not require belief in anything supernatural. Similar "religions" include Hitler's Naziism, the Tea Party, the Occupy movement, and major-league sports.

Sorta like the Anti-NT sentiment that seems to pervade WP.

You could also consider Communism a religion in the sense that the people (are supposed to) hold Marxist doctrine as sacred, and believe that they are already living in (a worker's) Paradise.

I mean, religion is the political expression of faith, after all; so why not also accept the fact that when a political system crosses the line from a simple philosophy to a way of life, it becomes a religious system as well?


Hi Fnord,

Besides your off the wall cited remark of "Sorta like the Anti-NT sentiment that seems to pervade WP", with your former claims practicing yourself of what you claim to here observe, much like a Henry Ford with a strong flavor of a Stalin both complaining about observing their own acts, you made the major "side-step" of not observing the large number of Capitalists that only recognize religion when it offers enough profit in terms of money.

The vast majority of the "Survival of the Fittest" hypocritical practitioners in the Capitalist Marketplace of Business are at the core, strong "Neo-Atheists", in the majority of today's "Neo-Atheists" with money. These "Neo-Atheists" definitely do not think any thoughts originating within themselves, as the Love of Money originates their thoughts through the spirit of Mammon, and not of origin from reason. You made this observation of yourself elsewhere, where you declared that you had no interest of effects if they didn't directly impact you, with everybody else none of your concern to the least whit.

Unless, of course, everybody else stops their worship of the Great Capitalist Religion of Mammon, which will then render your self-proclaimed "Empiricism" (which is a pseudo-empiricism describable with your own non sequitur of "secular religion") another worthless pile.

Tadzio



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

26 Jan 2012, 4:33 am

Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

Have you tried: "SOTU: Dumbed down and recycled" for the "again rated at an 8th grade comprehension level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test" to see if that helps???:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt187940.html

Tadzio


There's this great movie line, I don't know if it's original to the film it appears in, but it seems appropriate here.

"The first time someone calls you a horse you punch him on the nose, the second time someone calls you a horse you call him a jerk but the third time someone calls you a horse, well then perhaps it's time to go shopping for a saddle."

If we substitute "says 'WTF?'" for "calls you a horse", I'd say you've been called a horse at least a good dozen times in the last few months or so. Time to go saddle shopping?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

26 Jan 2012, 4:51 am

Fnord wrote:
I said secular religion - a fanatical belief system that is mostly faith-based, yet does not require belief in anything supernatural. Similar "religions" include Hitler's Naziism, the Tea Party, the Occupy movement, and major-league sports.


Sorry but we have a word for religion and another for ideology. Religion, at least in my view, must involve an element of collective spirituality. It seems to me that you are equivocating, mostly out of convenience, so as to label something as 'other'.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

26 Jan 2012, 5:16 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:


I liked the book (despite disagreeing with it fundamentally) when it first came out. However, as I've matured, I've realized that Hedges offers nothing but flowery, unverifiable, literary critic nonsense and tangential ramblings.


Dox47 wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
... nothing but flowery, unverifiable, literary critic nonsense and tangential ramblings.


Sounds like most of PPR in a nutshell to me... :lol:


Dox47 wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

Have you tried: "SOTU: Dumbed down and recycled" for the "again rated at an 8th grade comprehension level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test" to see if that helps???:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt187940.html

Tadzio


There's this great movie line, I don't know if it's original to the film it appears in, but it seems appropriate here.

"The first time someone calls you a horse you punch him on the nose, the second time someone calls you a horse you call him a jerk but the third time someone calls you a horse, well then perhaps it's time to go shopping for a saddle."

If we substitute "says 'WTF?'" for "calls you a horse", I'd say you've been called a horse at least a good dozen times in the last few months or so. Time to go saddle shopping?


Hi Dox47,

Which level of Dante's Inferno do you think your ride with The Divine Comedy will take you with your level of intelligence and morality???

Tadzio



Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

26 Jan 2012, 5:25 am

Tadzio wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:


I liked the book (despite disagreeing with it fundamentally) when it first came out. However, as I've matured, I've realized that Hedges offers nothing but flowery, unverifiable, literary critic nonsense and tangential ramblings.


Dox47 wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
... nothing but flowery, unverifiable, literary critic nonsense and tangential ramblings.


Sounds like most of PPR in a nutshell to me... :lol:


Dox47 wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

Have you tried: "SOTU: Dumbed down and recycled" for the "again rated at an 8th grade comprehension level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test" to see if that helps???:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt187940.html

Tadzio


There's this great movie line, I don't know if it's original to the film it appears in, but it seems appropriate here.

"The first time someone calls you a horse you punch him on the nose, the second time someone calls you a horse you call him a jerk but the third time someone calls you a horse, well then perhaps it's time to go shopping for a saddle."

If we substitute "says 'WTF?'" for "calls you a horse", I'd say you've been called a horse at least a good dozen times in the last few months or so. Time to go saddle shopping?


Hi Dox47,

Which level of Dante's Inferno do you think your ride with The Divine Comedy will take you with your level of intelligence and morality???

Tadzio


echo



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

26 Jan 2012, 10:53 am

Dox47 wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
... nothing but flowery, unverifiable, literary critic nonsense and tangential ramblings.


Sounds like most of PPR in a nutshell to me... :lol:


Replace "flowery" and "ramblings" with "acerbic" and "rantings".



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

26 Jan 2012, 10:55 am

Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

Which level of Dante's Inferno do you think your ride with The Divine Comedy will take you with your level of intelligence and morality???

Tadzio


So far, it's taken me to whichever level it is that houses condescending people who overestimate their own intelligence; it's a promotion from the fanatics wing. My job here is to occasionally deflate them a little, poke the ole ego with a sharp stick. It's ultimately for their own good, they don't get to leave the superiority complex level until their egos have deflated enough to pass through the grating. The pay isn't great but the work can be rewarding.

When I'm not contracting for Infernocorp® or posting outside the Inferno (PPR), I'm just a humble gunsmith and handyman with a few minor talents and enough odd jobs to make for a nice lifestyle. I get to smoke cigars, shoot guns, work with metal, enjoy the company of my wife and even do some pretty damn good cooking too. I even have the time to found and run an Aspie support group with over 300 members; I'd say my intellect and morals are serving me just fine.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

26 Jan 2012, 11:00 am

marshall wrote:
Replace "flowery" and "ramblings" with "acerbic" and "rantings".


I occasionally try and come up with new meaning for PPR, some of my favorites:

Paranoid Political Ranting

Polite Philosophical Rambling

People Preaching Religion

Pundits Predicting Rancor

I'm sure most regulars have their own versions... :lol:


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

26 Jan 2012, 3:29 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

Which level of Dante's Inferno do you think your ride with The Divine Comedy will take you with your level of intelligence and morality???

Tadzio


So far, it's taken me to whichever level it is that houses condescending people who overestimate their own intelligence; it's a promotion from the fanatics wing. My job here is to occasionally deflate them a little, poke the ole ego with a sharp stick. It's ultimately for their own good, they don't get to leave the superiority complex level until their egos have deflated enough to pass through the grating. The pay isn't great but the work can be rewarding.

When I'm not contracting for Infernocorp® or posting outside the Inferno (PPR), I'm just a humble gunsmith and handyman with a few minor talents and enough odd jobs to make for a nice lifestyle. I get to smoke cigars, shoot guns, work with metal, enjoy the company of my wife and even do some pretty damn good cooking too. I even have the time to found and run an Aspie support group with over 300 members; I'd say my intellect and morals are serving me just fine.


I wish I could find an Aspie support group here in the Spokane area. The only one I know of is fictional, in the movie, Mozart And The Whale.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

26 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
I wish I could find an Aspie support group here in the Spokane area. The only one I know of is fictional, in the movie, Mozart And The Whale.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


That's been such an issue with us; there are so many people out there that are looking for groups where there's just nothing locally available. My group is slowly expanding into the surrounding area, but it might be a while before we get as far as Spokane I'm afraid. We've got an Olympia chapter, a South Sound chapter that meets in down around Burien, our main Seattle group, and a women's group that meets in Seattle. It's really tough finding group leaders and suitable spaces, especially when we're operating completely on a volunteer basis and don't charge anything for any of the meetings. Little by little though we are expanding an adding new events, the local Aspie population is literally starved for social contact and seems to have a limitless appetite for more meetings.

On the good news front, we just acquired a bunch of domain names to expand the site off of meetup and get a better mechanism in place for creating expansion chapters; I basically want to franchise our operation so that anyone can set up a group under our umbrella and have access to our experience in running AS groups free of charge. We're also toying with setting up as a 501.c3 charitable organization and applying for grants to ease the trouble in finding locations and perhaps subsidizing some meeting until they get established. As it is, our Seattle host is incredibly generous in providing space, food and drink at his own expense, the organization would have collapsed long ago without his support.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

26 Jan 2012, 7:15 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

Have you tried: "SOTU: Dumbed down and recycled" for the "again rated at an 8th grade comprehension level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test" to see if that helps???:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt187940.html

Tadzio


There's this great movie line, I don't know if it's original to the film it appears in, but it seems appropriate here.

"The first time someone calls you a horse you punch him on the nose, the second time someone calls you a horse you call him a jerk but the third time someone calls you a horse, well then perhaps it's time to go shopping for a saddle."

If we substitute "says 'WTF?'" for "calls you a horse", I'd say you've been called a horse at least a good dozen times in the last few months or so. Time to go saddle shopping?


Dox47 wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

Which level of Dante's Inferno do you think your ride with The Divine Comedy will take you with your level of intelligence and morality???

Tadzio


So far, it's taken me to whichever level it is that houses condescending people who overestimate their own intelligence; it's a promotion from the fanatics wing. My job here is to occasionally deflate them a little, poke the ole ego with a sharp stick. It's ultimately for their own good, they don't get to leave the superiority complex level until their egos have deflated enough to pass through the grating. The pay isn't great but the work can be rewarding.

When I'm not contracting for Infernocorp® or posting outside the Inferno (PPR), I'm just a humble gunsmith and handyman with a few minor talents and enough odd jobs to make for a nice lifestyle. I get to smoke cigars, shoot guns, work with metal, enjoy the company of my wife and even do some pretty damn good cooking too. I even have the time to found and run an Aspie support group with over 300 members; I'd say my intellect and morals are serving me just fine.


Dox47 wrote:
marshall wrote:
Replace "flowery" and "ramblings" with "acerbic" and "rantings".


I occasionally try and come up with new meaning for PPR, some of my favorites:

Paranoid Political Ranting

Polite Philosophical Rambling

People Preaching Religion

Pundits Predicting Rancor

I'm sure most regulars have their own versions... :lol:


Hi Dox47,

You make reference to "your job" in your sentence " My job here is to occasionally deflate them a little, poke the ole ego with a sharp stick."

Does "WrongPlanet.net" authorize, or otherwise support, "your job" in interacting with other members on this website, beyond your having the same authorizations and/or support as the majority of other members of this website, for instance, such as such authorizations and/or support being distinct and different from mine?

Tadzio



Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

26 Jan 2012, 7:15 pm

edit

Hi Dox47,

I've been looking over my file posts, and exchanges with you number approx. 18 distinct posts out of my about 700 total posts on WP.

The first one involving you was http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp4043197.html#4043197

Dox47 wrote:
marshall wrote:
I didn't invite you to participate in this thread. Now get lost before you irritate me even more.


Whoa, hold up there. Not to pick at a sore point or anything, but since when do thread OPs get to decide who can and cannot participate in threads they start? That only *sorta* flies in the Women's forum, but certainly not in here; disparate opinions are the raison d'être of PPR, even if they make you mad.


You made there the opposite claim you are making presently.

You then assert:
Dox47 wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47, your notice wasn't received here, sans the cherry picking.

Tadzio


Not sure what you're talking about there, I'm not a mod and carry no authority over Inuyasha or anyone else beyond pointing things out.


Then in the forum "Herman Cain: Another Country Club Conservative Elitist", you cited quotations from other individuals that I cited, including one from the famous English author Jonathan Swift, with the remark:
Dox47 wrote:
^
Are you quite sure you speak English? (pardon me if you're truly ESL, but that's not the first post of yours to make my brain hurt)


In the forum for "The Trouble with Militant Atheist", you jump to:
Dox47 wrote:
I use the same standard for atheists and theists alike when determining militancy. IMHO the line is interjection, if people are minding their own business and talking about their faith or lack thereof and you can't help but butt in to dispute same, you might be edging into militant territory.


Involving "concise" posts, I posted in response to you:
Tadzio wrote:
Dox47 wrote:


The best way to handle serial Fiskers is to rope-a-dope them with concise posts, it's hard to Fisk an austere and to the point post, and if they reply with reams of text most people will just skim over it or not read it at all. Ruveyn is notably good at this, most of his posts don't exceed a paragraph and yet tend to convey all the information he felt was necessary to make his point. You could do far worse in a role model for posting style in a politics forum.


Hi Dox47,

A "concise post" requires many otherwise non-expressed ideas that have to be assumed as already accepted by all individuals. This requirement would frustrate any open discussion of "Politics, Philosophy, and Religion", and also would preclude complex subjects often assumed as "simple". (I just previewed a philosophy book that took 800 pages to "explain" the speed of light as an absolute limit, but while acknowledging that a point of light from a Laser Pointer can easily transverse the surface of the Moon at a speed faster than that of light).

Also, "dumbing" down to "Plain English" is a controversial political issue:
http://www.sourcetext.com/grammarian/le ... say/12.htm

A "Standards of Conciseness" would also discriminate against individuals similar to myself, and would be in violation of the ADA.

Tadzio


To which you responded:
Dox47 wrote:
^
No one's proposing any sort of brevity rule, we're just discussing techniques for dealing with a certain type of forum blowhard. Nobody is going to restrict your rambling, even though as a private website I don't believe the ADA has any power here.


When I responded to your forum on "A Societal Good Allegory: A modest proposal: Let's ban all sports!" (Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:33 am), with my understanding of Expected Values of Safety concerns & OSHA, and my other response to your forum on "This Explains So Much...: Court OKs Barring High IQs for Cops" citing the
case by court case citation at http://www.aele.org/apa/jordan-newlondon.html , you made the response:
Dox47 wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi Dox47,

I've cited this case many times here at WrongPlanet, (search here for "too smart to be a cop" gives a page of results, such as: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf165835-0-60.html


That does ring a vague bell now that you mention it, but it brings me to some seemingly unavoidable unpleasantness. To be honest with you Tadzio, I tend to either skim or skip your posts when I see them, I find your posting style to be roundabout and difficult to follow, and there often seems to be an underlying contempt or derisiveness that I find distasteful. I could be wrong about that last part, it could simply be an artifact of whatever translation your posts are going through, I'm just relaying how it comes across to me.

I for one have made it very clear that I post here for my own enjoyment, and I simply refuse to jump through hoops that other members might throw up for me. Want to demand I "disprove" something or I "lose" the thread? I'll pass. Claim that if I can't understand you it's because of a problem on my end? Not interested in that either. Needless to say, I'm not inclined towards cryptic, vaguely insulting posts, it's just not my bag.

Now as this is an AS board, I'm not judging you for this or anything, I'm sure you've got a perfectly valid reason for how you communicate, but as I'm not under any sort of obligation here I choose to post around you for the most part. Nothing personal, I've just got better things to do (usually :wink: ) than try to figure out what you meant by something, usually a long and meticulously sourced something, and craft an appropriate response.

Take that however you want, I just don't like it when people dismiss my long and meticulous posts with a flip comment, so I figured I owed you the explanation, if nothing else.

and the disjoint post of:
Dox47 wrote:
Given that language is a medium of communication first and foremost, I have to wonder about the motivation of someone who makes theirs so deliberately ostentatious that it becomes difficult to understand. Clearly communication is not the priority in that case, so what could it be?


Then just before your expressed concerns of vocabulary here, I responded to your claimed practice of segregating out difficult Asperger's individuals at your future meetings, with:
Tadzio wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
OliveOilMom wrote:
I don't think it's complaining thats the problem, so much as it's constant complaining. When someone has a truly valid complaint, or a real problem, or is having a bad time, that's completely understandable. What becomes annoying is when someone constantly complains about every single thing and nothing is ever good or good enough, in fact it's horrible, they are out to get me, oh no, is when it starts getting on people's nerves.

Most people will sympathise with someone who occasionally complains. Everyone occasionally complains. It's the people who do it constantly that bother me. Nobody wants to be around that kind of negativity. When people constantly complain, then others back off and stay away from them, they see that as proof that they aren't liked so therefore their complaints are true, when in fact it's their constant complaining that drives others away.

Those kind of people, you can't even have a conversation with. If you tell them something good that happened to you, they just start about how "oh, that never happens to me, poor me, yaddah yaddah" instead of saying something nice. If you do something nice for them it becomes "Yeah well, you did this but I still don't have this or that or the other thing" and on and on. It drives people away. My mother is like this. Thats why nobody really goes to see her or does anything for her. Let her sit there and hate everyone and feel persecuted alone.


X2, especially on the self fulfilling prophecy angle. My AS meetup group was actually formed because of a shared bad experience between me and the other founders of another meeting where two people would dominate the entire meeting with "woe is me" stories and even hijack other people's experiences to insert their own negative spin on them. It's very tough to deal with, and does tend to drive people physically away.


Hi Dox47,

People go to AS meetups to learn how to avoid people with "negative" AS instead of "positive" AS?

Both are distinguishing criteria used to characterize AS in social interactions, and are under the "disorder", which to the general population, are both a "negative" for social interactions.

Next, the DSM-VI will have to consider purely Psychogenic Autism Spectrum Disorders again, but then under Conversion Disorders for manipulated social interactions with motive ("self-fulfilling prophecy" necessitates the "psychogenic", and a different approach to professional recommendations).

Tadzio


Then you make the claim here:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I wish I could find an Aspie support group here in the Spokane area. The only one I know of is fictional, in the movie, Mozart And The Whale.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


That's been such an issue with us; there are so many people out there that are looking for groups where there's just nothing locally available. My group is slowly expanding into the surrounding area, but it might be a while before we get as far as Spokane I'm afraid. We've got an Olympia chapter, a South Sound chapter that meets in down around Burien, our main Seattle group, and a women's group that meets in Seattle. It's really tough finding group leaders and suitable spaces, especially when we're operating completely on a volunteer basis and don't charge anything for any of the meetings. Little by little though we are expanding an adding new events, the local Aspie population is literally starved for social contact and seems to have a limitless appetite for more meetings.

On the good news front, we just acquired a bunch of domain names to expand the site off of meetup and get a better mechanism in place for creating expansion chapters; I basically want to franchise our operation so that anyone can set up a group under our umbrella and have access to our experience in running AS groups free of charge. We're also toying with setting up as a 501.c3 charitable organization and applying for grants to ease the trouble in finding locations and perhaps subsidizing some meeting until they get established. As it is, our Seattle host is incredibly generous in providing space, food and drink at his own expense, the organization would have collapsed long ago without his support.



Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

27 Jan 2012, 2:14 am

Dox47 wrote:
So far, it's taken me to whichever level it is that houses condescending people who overestimate their own intelligence; it's a promotion from the fanatics wing. My job here is to occasionally deflate them a little, poke the ole ego with a sharp stick. It's ultimately for their own good, they don't get to leave the superiority complex level until their egos have deflated enough to pass through the grating. The pay isn't great but the work can be rewarding.


Hi Dox47,

The "Tough Love" techniques you attempt to practice are dangerous.

Sounds like "shove their deflated egos through the grating" to your sewer level is your typical modus operandi in dealing with individuals on the Spectrum of Autistic Disorders, and perhaps general members of the public who do not bow down to your heavily armed sense of superiority.

With the flip-flop between "Good-Cop/Bad-Cop" routines, with periods of slick & diplomatic language usage, you have raised my concerns with the safety of vulnerable individuals.

Tadzio



heavenlyabyss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,393

27 Jan 2012, 5:08 am

Not sure what to say about the Marxists, but I'm one of those people who is not particularly fond of the New Atheists. My main problem is that I see a lot of hate behind it disguised as compassion. The old, "We are attacking you because we love you" bit just doesn't sit right with me.

I have no problem with attacking bad behavior that is influenced by religion and I have no problem with pointing out logical fallacies in religion, my problem is with certain Atheists (not all atheists of course) who feel they are superior and feel the need to rip religious people to shreds just to prove a point. The problem is they are being hypocritical and making themselves look bad.

As for rational atheists who calmly point out flaws in religion and the evils that religion is sometimes used for, I salute them for the bravery.



heavenlyabyss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,393

27 Jan 2012, 5:11 am

Also, I will say, that I have a problem with atheists who view "reason as their God" This is not my original quote but from someone else. I'm all for reason, but I think spirituality is important as well.