blauSamstag wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
In my infinite ignorance I'd argue that they weren't then and aren't now. Afghanistan's looking like it will be more of a headache to try and clean up or stabilize anymore than it is but things are pretty much the same and Obama, even if he might have traded numbers for strategy on the last troop surge, didn't pull out and let the whole thing unravel.
I'd argue that unless we're prepared to install an oppressive occupying force in both countries for the next 50 years or more, both of them will devolve into a mess roughly similar to what they were before we went in.
They are both vietnam in the sense that they are soverign nations that we have no business "liberating" - who's people will never be free as long as they live with our military force, and won't recognize freedom when they see it after we leave.
With Afghanistan we were kind of backed into the wall with 9/11, and with our memories of how we bungled the situation with the Mujaheddin vs. Russia I don't think we wanted to walk out the same way. Iraq's a story that'll likely be debatable for the next twenty or thirty years - did we know that he had/didn't have WMD's? Did something get fabricated and forced through Colin Powell? Did Saddam pass off and bury his stuff in Syria? Lots of big mysteries, then again going forward we have a better shot of stabilizing that than Afghanistan.
Really I'm not sure what we can do, "Pull out - its easy" isn't the answer. perhaps ramp down and keep training their public police and military to have some type of well-formed layer of civil servants as well as institutions to anchor the hillside in so to speak but aside from getting them on their own feet we've got nothing. S Korea though is another example of where, technically, we never left.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.