scubasteve wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
scubasteve wrote:
And then there is the fact that something - *anything* - ever existed at all. Logically, it shouldn't.
Huh?
Evolution, Big Bang, all these theories start with
something. But how did anything exist in the first place?
I don't know how to answer that question. I also don't see the relevance. If there is an answer, then the only way for that answer to work is if it is logically necessary that a certain thing existed, otherwise it could possibly NOT exist. But the issue is that if God or something else were logically necessary, we wouldn't need this kind of round-about way of proving God's existence, it just wouldn't make sense. So, from what I can see, this question actually is useless, because once we can start giving ANY answer of an existing thing that allows other existing things, then I can just presuppose the "Big Bang creator", an entity that only has the power to cause a Big Bang to occur, and then claim that this is more ontologically parsimonious than any God.