Signs the US is ruled by communists
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
smells right wing propaganda trolling... or potential sarcasm...
But if not... then the rest of the developed 1st world nations must all be commie.
YAY! I'm living in Communist England and never knew....

_________________
Aspie score: 149 of 200 NT score: 52 of 200
AQ: 42 EIQ: 52 IQ: 156
MBTI: INTJ ('Mastermind')
Autistic/BAP : 118 aloof, 90 rigid and 83 pragmatic
EQSQ: 16/87 Extreme Systemizing
Joker
Veteran

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Vigilans wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
Wilhelm II became more popular with the german people that is why he ended up ruling and not Bismarck.
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
Wilhelm II became more popular with the german people that is why he ended up ruling and not Bismarck.
No... he was next in line for the throne... he dismissed Bismarck as his chancellor
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Joker
Veteran

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
Wilhelm II became more popular with the german people that is why he ended up ruling and not Bismarck.
No... he was next in line for the throne... he dismissed Bismarck as his chancellor
Bismarck had views that didn't seem to fit with Wilhelm II and Wilhelm II did great thing's for Prussia and making it a world power.
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
Wilhelm II became more popular with the german people that is why he ended up ruling and not Bismarck.
No... he was next in line for the throne... he dismissed Bismarck as his chancellor
Bismarck had views that didn't seem to fit with Wilhelm II and Wilhelm II did great thing's for Prussia and making it a world power.
Bismarck was the German Empire. Wilhelm II was more responsible for destroying it than anybody else
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Joker
Veteran

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
Wilhelm II became more popular with the german people that is why he ended up ruling and not Bismarck.
No... he was next in line for the throne... he dismissed Bismarck as his chancellor
Bismarck had views that didn't seem to fit with Wilhelm II and Wilhelm II did great thing's for Prussia and making it a world power.
Bismarck was the German Empire. Wilhelm II was more responsible for destroying it than anybody else
Bismarck was the founder yes but like most founders of anything they get taken over by another I like Bismarck the great things he did for my people but I do agree he should have been chancellor but things don't happen the way we want them to I didn't like the fact my irish ancestores faced 800 years of oppresion at the hands of the British but it still happend.
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
Wilhelm II became more popular with the german people that is why he ended up ruling and not Bismarck.
No... he was next in line for the throne... he dismissed Bismarck as his chancellor
Bismarck had views that didn't seem to fit with Wilhelm II and Wilhelm II did great thing's for Prussia and making it a world power.
Bismarck was the German Empire. Wilhelm II was more responsible for destroying it than anybody else
Bismarck was the founder yes but like most founders of anything they get taken over by another I like Bismarck the great things he did for my people but I do agree he should have been chancellor but things don't happen the way we want them to I didn't like the fact my irish ancestores faced 800 years of oppresion at the hands of the British but it still happend.
http://www.m0ar.org/2906
Please read more about the history of German from 1871-1918
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Joker
Veteran

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Because Obama Care is proof that the United States is a commie nation.
Germany under Chancellor Bismark has social security and government paid medical care. That was hardly a communist state.
ruveyn
Bismarck should have ruled Germany and not that boorish megalomaniac Wilhelm II. The 20th century would have turned out much, much differently
Wilhelm II became more popular with the german people that is why he ended up ruling and not Bismarck.
No... he was next in line for the throne... he dismissed Bismarck as his chancellor
Bismarck had views that didn't seem to fit with Wilhelm II and Wilhelm II did great thing's for Prussia and making it a world power.
Bismarck was the German Empire. Wilhelm II was more responsible for destroying it than anybody else
Bismarck was the founder yes but like most founders of anything they get taken over by another I like Bismarck the great things he did for my people but I do agree he should have been chancellor but things don't happen the way we want them to I didn't like the fact my irish ancestores faced 800 years of oppresion at the hands of the British but it still happend.
http://www.m0ar.org/2906
Please read more about the history of German from 1871-1918
Well I am German so I think I know about my own peoples history.
LunaticOnTheGrass
Snowy Owl

Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 136
Location: Under the Sun, in tune.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Better at recognizing subtle signs of anger? |
23 Jun 2025, 4:12 am |
Diagnosed Late? Let’s Talk Childhood Signs |
19 Jul 2025, 1:35 am |