Lots of people to reply to.
Grebels wrote:
Quote:
The New Age stuff actually has its roots in the mid 19th century with the advent of spiritualism etc.
I know about the knock knock who's there times of early spiritualism, but how about the Oracle at Delphi and things in much more ancient times.
Oracles, such as the Oracle at Delphi were really part of the Ancient Greek religion. Religions have always involved a belief in the supernatural but what I was referring to was the beginnings of what we now call the New Age Movement.
thedaywalker wrote:
i don't think anyone that can't even explain the effects of a simple mushroom should be as arrogant as he is
You think Richard Dawkins is arrogant? Contrary to being arrogant, skeptics are usually the first people to admit they don't know when confronted with something they can't explain.
Robdemanc wrote:
I think anti depressants are over prescribed and aggessively sold to health professionals by drug companies. And I think the way they work has a strong correlation with the drug MDMA (Ecstasy), it is curious that all modern antidepressants came about after the 1950's when MDMA was first synthesised.
Also there is no proof that depression is caused by a lack of chemicals in the brain, and furthermore the anti depressants do not even increase the chemicals in the brain, they just make them longer acting. I think it is an industry that is chasing big profits rather than helping people.
I would agree that anti-depressents over-prescribed. One must actually be careful when prescribing anti-depressants, for example Prozac has been known to cause people to commit suicide. It may seem paradoxical that a drug designed to reduce the symptoms of depression can actually cause people to commit suicide but it does make sense if considers that people with clinical depression might of been having thoughts of suicide for a long time but just lacked the motivation for going through with it. Drugs like Prozac can initially improve symptoms like lack of motivation before the overall mood improves and that's what causes the problem.
Joker wrote:
Richard Dawkins said that Religion is a scientific theory that actually is the less hateful thing he has said about people of faith.
I think this series is more about superstition and alternative medicine than about religion or people of faith.
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
When Dawkins indicates that people should be skeptical that's wonderful - he has to just be aware that it doesn't end with him either.
He does say to look at the evidence. I'm not sure how anyone who's seen the evidence for evolution would not conclude that evolution is the right explanation for the diversity and complexity of life.