Page 2 of 5 [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

29 May 2012, 4:25 pm

Fogman wrote:
Xenu wrote:
VOTE FOR SOCIALISM, UNCONSITUTIONAL WARS, AND DETAINING INNOCENT AMERICANS FOR NOT AGREEING WITH THE STATUS QUO! OBAMA 2012!


Excuse me, but wasn't GW Bush advocating much the same thing?


And Romney is going to be like Bush, using his same advisers and all.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont

29 May 2012, 4:37 pm

snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Xenu wrote:
VOTE FOR SOCIALISM, UNCONSITUTIONAL WARS, AND DETAINING INNOCENT AMERICANS FOR NOT AGREEING WITH THE STATUS QUO! OBAMA 2012!


Excuse me, but wasn't GW Bush advocating much the same thing?


And Romney is going to be like Bush, using his same advisers and all.


We're F***ed aren't we?


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

29 May 2012, 4:54 pm

Fogman wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Xenu wrote:
VOTE FOR SOCIALISM, UNCONSITUTIONAL WARS, AND DETAINING INNOCENT AMERICANS FOR NOT AGREEING WITH THE STATUS QUO! OBAMA 2012!


Excuse me, but wasn't GW Bush advocating much the same thing?


And Romney is going to be like Bush, using his same advisers and all.


We're F***ed aren't we?


There's other people you can vote for.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 May 2012, 6:47 pm

snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Xenu wrote:
VOTE FOR SOCIALISM, UNCONSITUTIONAL WARS, AND DETAINING INNOCENT AMERICANS FOR NOT AGREEING WITH THE STATUS QUO! OBAMA 2012!


Excuse me, but wasn't GW Bush advocating much the same thing?


And Romney is going to be like Bush, using his same advisers and all.


We're F***ed aren't we?


There's other people you can vote for.


Were I a cynical person, I'd have to think voting for anything other than the two major parties is tantamount to flushing your ballot down the toilet.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

29 May 2012, 7:03 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Xenu wrote:
VOTE FOR SOCIALISM, UNCONSITUTIONAL WARS, AND DETAINING INNOCENT AMERICANS FOR NOT AGREEING WITH THE STATUS QUO! OBAMA 2012!


Excuse me, but wasn't GW Bush advocating much the same thing?


And Romney is going to be like Bush, using his same advisers and all.


We're F***ed aren't we?


There's other people you can vote for.


Were I a cynical person, I'd have to think voting for anything other than the two major parties is tantamount to flushing your ballot down the toilet.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Disgusting outlook. That kind of attitude is what got people used to the taste of douche and s**t.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

29 May 2012, 7:09 pm

If it were a republican president with even a scant rumor of an "assassination czar" we'd be up to 30+ pages of outrage from the left by now.....



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 May 2012, 7:13 pm

snapcap wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Xenu wrote:
VOTE FOR SOCIALISM, UNCONSITUTIONAL WARS, AND DETAINING INNOCENT AMERICANS FOR NOT AGREEING WITH THE STATUS QUO! OBAMA 2012!


Excuse me, but wasn't GW Bush advocating much the same thing?


And Romney is going to be like Bush, using his same advisers and all.


We're F***ed aren't we?


There's other people you can vote for.


Were I a cynical person, I'd have to think voting for anything other than the two major parties is tantamount to flushing your ballot down the toilet.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Disgusting outlook. That kind of attitude is what got people used to the taste of douche and sh**.


I said, if I were "a cynical person."

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

29 May 2012, 7:48 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Xenu wrote:
VOTE FOR SOCIALISM, UNCONSITUTIONAL WARS, AND DETAINING INNOCENT AMERICANS FOR NOT AGREEING WITH THE STATUS QUO! OBAMA 2012!


Excuse me, but wasn't GW Bush advocating much the same thing?


And Romney is going to be like Bush, using his same advisers and all.


We're F***ed aren't we?


There's other people you can vote for.


Were I a cynical person, I'd have to think voting for anything other than the two major parties is tantamount to flushing your ballot down the toilet.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Disgusting outlook. That kind of attitude is what got people used to the taste of douche and sh**.


I said, if I were "a cynical person."

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


It's a disgusting outlook if that's what anyone thinks.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


Oldout
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,539
Location: Reading, PA

30 May 2012, 10:28 am

It is getting scary when the "leaders" of this country are all followers. When I was younger we did have leaders who disagreed, but understood that some things needed to be done regardless of their disagreements and then compromised and did something. Today, both parties just shout and quote from their respective radicals. Until a third party makes a serious impact this nonsense will go on.



Longshanks
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 558
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la

30 May 2012, 10:49 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
Vote for Obama? Hell no...I don't even know I should vote for any of those clowns, I will be voting on my states bill to end marijuana prohibition in my state however :twisted:.


Really. It may interest you to know that the man who killed our oldest daughter in the car accident she died in was wasted on marijuana when it happened. God help us all!

Longshanks


_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com. Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why?


snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

30 May 2012, 11:48 am

Oldout wrote:
It is getting scary when the "leaders" of this country are all followers. When I was younger we did have leaders who disagreed, but understood that some things needed to be done regardless of their disagreements and then compromised and did something. Today, both parties just shout and quote from their respective radicals. Until a third party makes a serious impact this nonsense will go on.


Everyone needs to vote for some third party. It really doesn't matter if your candidate wins or not, if everyone voted for the person they liked, instead of the person they think will beat the person that's in office, it's a good start for a turn around. I doubt many people nowadays would admit they are voting for the people they like.

It's either "I'm voting for Mitt because he can't be worse than Obama" or "I'm voting for Obama because he's better than that Bush party guy" People are fooled (and stupid) because they act like everything is on the line, EVERY ELECTION CYCLE. So, it doesn't really matter how many momentum change has going up to the next cycle. People are short sighted.

Everyone that is an American citizen (or not!) has the right to vote. You also have the right not to vote, and you have must be RESPONSIBLE for your vote.

I think people have neglected their responsibility.

Maybe people probably look at it like a lottery, "I'm going to vote for this guy because I think he'll win, (and that will make me feel good). I like the other guy better, but they don't have a chance to win, and I won't feel good voting for him (wasted voted :roll: )

It's also like complaining about Wal-Mart but shopping there anyways.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

30 May 2012, 2:21 pm

snapcap wrote:
Oldout wrote:
It is getting scary when the "leaders" of this country are all followers. When I was younger we did have leaders who disagreed, but understood that some things needed to be done regardless of their disagreements and then compromised and did something. Today, both parties just shout and quote from their respective radicals. Until a third party makes a serious impact this nonsense will go on.


Everyone needs to vote for some third party. It really doesn't matter if your candidate wins or not, if everyone voted for the person they liked, instead of the person they think will beat the person that's in office, it's a good start for a turn around. I doubt many people nowadays would admit they are voting for the people they like.

It's either "I'm voting for Mitt because he can't be worse than Obama" or "I'm voting for Obama because he's better than that Bush party guy" People are fooled (and stupid) because they act like everything is on the line, EVERY ELECTION CYCLE. So, it doesn't really matter how many momentum change has going up to the next cycle. People are short sighted.

Everyone that is an American citizen (or not!) has the right to vote. You also have the right not to vote, and you have must be RESPONSIBLE for your vote.

I think people have neglected their responsibility.

Maybe people probably look at it like a lottery, "I'm going to vote for this guy because I think he'll win, (and that will make me feel good). I like the other guy better, but they don't have a chance to win, and I won't feel good voting for him (wasted voted :roll: )

It's also like complaining about Wal-Mart but shopping there anyways.

True, but given the current circumstances that will probably have to wait a couple presidential election cycles.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 May 2012, 3:06 pm

Longshanks wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Vote for Obama? Hell no...I don't even know I should vote for any of those clowns, I will be voting on my states bill to end marijuana prohibition in my state however :twisted:.


Really. It may interest you to know that the man who killed our oldest daughter in the car accident she died in was wasted on marijuana when it happened. God help us all!

Longshanks


I am sincerely sorry to learn that you have lost a child. As a parent myself, I don't know how I could handle that.
Even if pot is legalized someday, absolutely no one should get behind the wheel impaired by any substance. Considering your past experience, I can understand how you would oppose legalization.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

30 May 2012, 3:44 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

There's other people you can vote for.


Were I a cynical person, I'd have to think voting for anything other than the two major parties is tantamount to flushing your ballot down the toilet.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer[/quote]

The Republican party started off as a successful third party. They carried the 1860 election.

ruveyn



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 May 2012, 4:13 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

There's other people you can vote for.


Were I a cynical person, I'd have to think voting for anything other than the two major parties is tantamount to flushing your ballot down the toilet.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


The Republican party started off as a successful third party. They carried the 1860 election.

ruveyn[/quote]

That is absolutely true, but only when the old Whig party was gurgling it's death rattle.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

30 May 2012, 8:43 pm

John_Browning wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Oldout wrote:
It is getting scary when the "leaders" of this country are all followers. When I was younger we did have leaders who disagreed, but understood that some things needed to be done regardless of their disagreements and then compromised and did something. Today, both parties just shout and quote from their respective radicals. Until a third party makes a serious impact this nonsense will go on.


Everyone needs to vote for some third party. It really doesn't matter if your candidate wins or not, if everyone voted for the person they liked, instead of the person they think will beat the person that's in office, it's a good start for a turn around. I doubt many people nowadays would admit they are voting for the people they like.

It's either "I'm voting for Mitt because he can't be worse than Obama" or "I'm voting for Obama because he's better than that Bush party guy" People are fooled (and stupid) because they act like everything is on the line, EVERY ELECTION CYCLE. So, it doesn't really matter how many momentum change has going up to the next cycle. People are short sighted.

Everyone that is an American citizen (or not!) has the right to vote. You also have the right not to vote, and you have must be RESPONSIBLE for your vote.

I think people have neglected their responsibility.

Maybe people probably look at it like a lottery, "I'm going to vote for this guy because I think he'll win, (and that will make me feel good). I like the other guy better, but they don't have a chance to win, and I won't feel good voting for him (wasted voted :roll: )

It's also like complaining about Wal-Mart but shopping there anyways.

True, but given the current circumstances that will probably have to wait a couple presidential election cycles.


That's what they said a couple election cycles ago. How about now?


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"