Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Dictators supported by the US

Page 2 of 6 [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 12:36 pm

Kjas wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
If it is not in the constitution it did not happen


:lmao:

Play nice with joker, you know he can't tell when you're like this.


I don't understand sarcasm at all it so confusing :lol:



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

09 Jun 2012, 12:43 pm

I'm not being sarcastic, its my birthday and I am feeling satirical

Also, it sounds to me like you have been reading too much of that combined Koran-Communist Manifesto by BARABck Osama


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm

Vigilans wrote:
I'm not being sarcastic, its my birthday and I am feeling satirical

Also, it sounds to me like you have been reading too much of that combined Koran-Communist Manifesto by BARABck Osama


I am not a Communist I am a strong political indepenent so strong that I do not have any ties to any politcal party of political ideology.



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

09 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm

Vigilans wrote:
I'm not being sarcastic, its my birthday and I am feeling satirical

Also, it sounds to me like you have been reading too much of that combined Koran-Communist Manifesto by BARABck Osama


BARABck Hussein Os(b)ama??? :razz:


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm

Kjas wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
I'm not being sarcastic, its my birthday and I am feeling satirical

Also, it sounds to me like you have been reading too much of that combined Koran-Communist Manifesto by BARABck Osama


BARABck Hussein Os(b)ama??? :razz:


:lol: :o :D



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

09 Jun 2012, 12:52 pm

The US pursues it's interests in the world as it exists. Plus, we were the leading western faction during the cold war. Russia was snapping up any client states that we didnt get. Collective security was and is an axiom in the West.

In terms of deals, almost all nations make deals with dictators. That's the world.



Last edited by simon_says on 09 Jun 2012, 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

09 Jun 2012, 12:52 pm

Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
If it is not in the constitution it did not happen


Lots of things america has done has affected the Middel East we put the Taliban in power we put Saddam Hussein in power to.


Just in case you missed some history classes. These both happened during the cold war. It was either help someone fighting the russians or let the russians keep expanding. Most of that list follows this exact same format. Its a lesser of two evils. Notice many of them were through ww2 and shortly afterwards. This entire list is just an alliedship for ww2 and cold war.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 12:54 pm

MXH wrote:
Joker wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
If it is not in the constitution it did not happen


Lots of things america has done has affected the Middel East we put the Taliban in power we put Saddam Hussein in power to.


Just in case you missed some history classes. These both happened during the cold war. It was either help someone fighting the russians or let the russians keep expanding. Most of that list follows this exact same format. Its a lesser of two evils. Notice many of them were through ww2 and shortly afterwards. This entire list is just an alliedship for ww2 and cold war.


I know that then they turned on us we should have given those wepons to a dffrent group doesn't change the fact that they still hate us then and now.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 12:55 pm

simon_says wrote:
The US pursues it's interests in the world as it exists. Plus, we were the leading western faction during the cold war. Russia was snapping up any client states that we didnt get. Collective security was and is an axiom in the West.

In terms of deals, almost all nations make deals with dictators. That's the world.


The US has also given wepons the terrorists even supported the IRA at one point.



Aelfwine
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 184

09 Jun 2012, 12:55 pm

The list will be longer in future.
Which is better, moral or practical foreign policy?
Should the Western foreign policy support dictatorships in future if it is necessary?



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

09 Jun 2012, 1:03 pm

Joker wrote:
Oh I was told though by Shatbat in another thread that he commited geneocide though I can not seem to find any form of proof that he did.


I just verified with Shatbat, and he is in agreement with me that Torrijos never committed genocide.

Trujillo did commit genocide. The names are very similar, and I thought you may have mixed them up. Would that be possible?


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

09 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm

Joker wrote:
simon_says wrote:
The US pursues it's interests in the world as it exists. Plus, we were the leading western faction during the cold war. Russia was snapping up any client states that we didnt get. Collective security was and is an axiom in the West.

In terms of deals, almost all nations make deals with dictators. That's the world.


The US has also given wepons the terrorists even supported the IRA at one point.



The US didnt help the IRA as far as I know. Irish Americans who lived in the US sent money to them. That's not government policy. And when we helped the Mujahudeen in Afghanistan, they were rebels fighting our cold war enemy. It took them a decade or more for some to morph into terrorists.

We may well be supporting bombing and assasination campaigns in Iran but there is no hard evidence. And we supported rebels in Iraq pre Gulf 2. What you call them depends on which side you are on.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm

simon_says wrote:
Joker wrote:
simon_says wrote:
The US pursues it's interests in the world as it exists. Plus, we were the leading western faction during the cold war. Russia was snapping up any client states that we didnt get. Collective security was and is an axiom in the West.

In terms of deals, almost all nations make deals with dictators. That's the world.


The US has also given wepons the terrorists even supported the IRA at one point.



The US didnt help the IRA as far as I know. Irish Americans who lived in the US sent money to them. That's not government policy. And when we helped the Mujahudeen in Afghanistan, they were rebels fighting our cold war enemy. It took them a decade or more for some to morph into terrorists.

We may well be supporting bombing and assasination campaigns in Iran but there is no hard evidence. And we supported rebels in Iraq pre Gulf 2. What you call them depends on which side you are on.


The CIA where sending wepons to the IRA in exchange for money.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm

Kjas wrote:
Joker wrote:
Oh I was told though by Shatbat in another thread that he commited geneocide though I can not seem to find any form of proof that he did.


I just verified with Shatbat, and he is in agreement with me that Torrijos never committed genocide.

Trujillo did commit genocide. The names are very similar, and I thought you may have mixed them up. Would that be possible?


Yes that is correct got the names mixed up.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm

Aelfwine wrote:
The list will be longer in future.
Which is better, moral or practical foreign policy?
Should the Western foreign policy support dictatorships in future if it is necessary?


No we should not it creates enemys of the State doing that.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

09 Jun 2012, 1:11 pm

simon_says wrote:
Joker wrote:
simon_says wrote:
The US pursues it's interests in the world as it exists. Plus, we were the leading western faction during the cold war. Russia was snapping up any client states that we didnt get. Collective security was and is an axiom in the West.

In terms of deals, almost all nations make deals with dictators. That's the world.


The US has also given wepons the terrorists even supported the IRA at one point.



The US didnt help the IRA as far as I know. Irish Americans who lived in the US sent money to them. That's not government policy. And when we helped the Mujahudeen in Afghanistan, they were rebels fighting our cold war enemy. It took them a decade or more for some to morph into terrorists.

We may well be supporting bombing and assasination campaigns in Iran but there is no hard evidence. And we supported rebels in Iraq pre Gulf 2. What you call them depends on which side you are on.


Pretty much this. Also following a trail of who we "support" is stupid. Lets look to the recent egyptian troubles. There was a famous case of someone finding american tear gas grenades being used by the egyptian government. This was seen as if we were directly supporting them (you know completely forgetting the aircraft carrier and squads of F15s overflying egypt ready to shoot down any attacking Egyptian airforce airplanes. Who knows how they got those grenades. They could have bought them long ago before any of this instability reached the point of cutting them off. They could have been bought through a middle man. Who really knows? All that did happen was blaming americans with no real proof.