Where the Canadian medical care system shines.

Page 2 of 4 [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

noname_ever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 500
Location: Indiana

04 Jul 2012, 11:23 am

Oodain wrote:
pure and utter bull on a global scale.

plenty of democracies are doing just fine despite not discriminating against anyone without a "significant investment".

by what concept does the mechanic work?
does people automatically change behaviors and thought patterns when they buy a plot of land?
or do they simply realize what they have always wanted and in that light why does the plot owner have any greater vested interest?
would it not be excactly because people dont have a plot of land yet that they want an efficient and functional government with a balanced economy to boot?


It's a simple mechanic. You can vote to get more out of the system than what you contribute. It's due to people voting in their self interest instead of the good of society. Those without much skin in the game do it as much as those paying into the system.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Jul 2012, 3:26 am

noname_ever wrote:

It's a simple mechanic. You can vote to get more out of the system than what you contribute. It's due to people voting in their self interest instead of the good of society. Those without much skin in the game do it as much as those paying into the system.


If someone is getting more out of the system than they contribute, someone is getting less out of the system than they contribute.

This system runs on people who produce a lot and receive less than they produce.

ruveyn



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

05 Jul 2012, 1:27 pm

Declension wrote:
One of the perceived problems of public healthcare systems is that people resent having to pay for other people's bad choices. Because of this, public healthcare systems usually do attempt to change the culture. Obamacare cannot accomplish this, because under Obamacare the health system is still run by for-profit institutions. So in a way, Obamacare might be the worst of both worlds.


But you have a group of interests who now have a very strong interest in the population making healthy choices.

The insurance industry is going to be stuck with a revenue squeeze: with a universal insurance requirement, there will be no room for the market to expand its base. With non-discrimination bars on pre-existing conditions, etc., there will be very little room to move on discretionary pricing. With government subsidizing the price differential, there will be very little room to move on bloc pricing. With regulations limiting deductibles, coverage caps and the like, there will be very little room to move on quantum of expenditures.

And that means that the way for insurers to maintain their profits is to do two things: 1) push back against pharmaceutical costs by promoting generics; and 2) reducing the number of claims.

Insurance companies have some very powerful tools in their arsenals. After pension funds and mutual funds, they are the third largest participants in the investment market--they can starve many companies of access to capital if those companies don't play in their sandbox. By promoting healthier choices and by undercutting the pharmaceutical industry, the insurers can start to keep their costs under control.


_________________
--James


Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

05 Jul 2012, 7:37 pm

I have heard good things. About the Netherlands Healthcare system. But in Canada I bet the wait at the doctors office. Is longer then it is in Amercia.



thewhitrbbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,124

05 Jul 2012, 8:18 pm

Insurance companies are limited on what discounts they can offer for healthy life style choices. Perhaps we should remove that legal limit to allow them to offer more incentives for healthy life styles.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Jul 2012, 6:44 am

thewhitrbbit wrote:
Insurance companies are limited on what discounts they can offer for healthy life style choices. Perhaps we should remove that legal limit to allow them to offer more incentives for healthy life styles.


Absolutely. People who control their weight, exercise regularly and are careful of their diet should be rewarded economically.

ruveyn



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

06 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm

Joker wrote:
I have heard good things. About the Netherlands Healthcare system. But in Canada I bet the wait at the doctors office. Is longer then it is in Amercia.


Yes, it's terrible. I called my doctor for an apppointment and he couldn't see me until the next day! [/sarcasm]

We have a few issues up here:

1) Too few family doctors--precisely the same problem that you have in the United States. Despite universal insurance, many people do not have a family doctor, and must rely on walk-in clinics for primary care.

2) Wait times in certain specialties. Generally speaking, wait times are well under control here. There are no wait times for critical care in any discipline--hospital care is comprehensive and immediate (subject to medical decision making, of course. Sometimes waiting is a good thing.) The biggest issue is for outpatients getting the first examination with a specialist. Typically, over half of referrals are seen within a month and 90% within 3 months. Some displines, such as neurology, have very significant wait times--largely because critical care cases keep bumping outpatients for priority.

3) Wait times for facilities. There are only a finite number of operating rooms, recovery beds and MRIs in the country, and each can only serve one patient at a time. The other major factor is geography. Operating rooms and diagnostic equipment are not portable, and we have only 35 million people spread out over an area of 10 million square km. Even if 90% live in the thin strip along the border, that still leaves a lot of Candians living in remote communities. Wait times for diagnostics are generally in the two week range, though the 90% benchmark still takes about 3 months. The priority for critical care will often create longer wait times for non-critical procedures--particularly ones like joint replacements that have extensive facility requirements.

But it is also important to remember that sometimes waiting is a good thing. Many patients are first seen when they are in distress or when they have been significantly weakened by the onset of symptoms that they could no longer ignore. It is often beneficial, in non-emergency situations, to wait until a patient is stronger and more stable before starting aggressive surgical or medical therapies--which patients don't always like to hear in this "I-want-to-feel-better-right-now!" world.


_________________
--James


Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

06 Jul 2012, 3:28 pm

visagrunt wrote:
Joker wrote:
I have heard good things. About the Netherlands Healthcare system. But in Canada I bet the wait at the doctors office. Is longer then it is in Amercia.


Yes, it's terrible. I called my doctor for an apppointment and he couldn't see me until the next day! [/sarcasm]

We have a few issues up here:

1) Too few family doctors--precisely the same problem that you have in the United States. Despite universal insurance, many people do not have a family doctor, and must rely on walk-in clinics for primary care.

2) Wait times in certain specialties. Generally speaking, wait times are well under control here. There are no wait times for critical care in any discipline--hospital care is comprehensive and immediate (subject to medical decision making, of course. Sometimes waiting is a good thing.) The biggest issue is for outpatients getting the first examination with a specialist. Typically, over half of referrals are seen within a month and 90% within 3 months. Some displines, such as neurology, have very significant wait times--largely because critical care cases keep bumping outpatients for priority.

3) Wait times for facilities. There are only a finite number of operating rooms, recovery beds and MRIs in the country, and each can only serve one patient at a time. The other major factor is geography. Operating rooms and diagnostic equipment are not portable, and we have only 35 million people spread out over an area of 10 million square km. Even if 90% live in the thin strip along the border, that still leaves a lot of Candians living in remote communities. Wait times for diagnostics are generally in the two week range, though the 90% benchmark still takes about 3 months. The priority for critical care will often create longer wait times for non-critical procedures--particularly ones like joint replacements that have extensive facility requirements.

But it is also important to remember that sometimes waiting is a good thing. Many patients are first seen when they are in distress or when they have been significantly weakened by the onset of symptoms that they could no longer ignore. It is often beneficial, in non-emergency situations, to wait until a patient is stronger and more stable before starting aggressive surgical or medical therapies--which patients don't always like to hear in this "I-want-to-feel-better-right-now!" world.


Good point but your not taking into the fact of a waiting list for a organ transplant.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Jul 2012, 4:41 pm

Joker wrote:

Good point but your not taking into the fact of a waiting list for a organ transplant.


That is more a matter of how many organs are available for transplant and the demand. No medical system can make organs out of thin air. They have to be there to be transplanted.

ruveyn



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

06 Jul 2012, 4:43 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Joker wrote:

Good point but your not taking into the fact of a waiting list for a organ transplant.


That is more a matter of how many organs are available for transplant and the demand. No medical system can make organs out of thin air. They have to be there to be transplanted.

ruveyn


Yes which is why just because you have Universal Healthcare doesn't mean it is a prefer system. The Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for everyones elses health. Only pay for their own.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Jul 2012, 4:45 pm

Joker wrote:

Yes which is why just because you have Universal Healthcare doesn't mean it is a prefer system. The Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for everyones elses health. Only pay for their own.


What about contagious diseases? It makes sense to fund vaccines out of a general revenue source since the health of the entire community is at stake.

ruveyn



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

06 Jul 2012, 4:50 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Joker wrote:

Yes which is why just because you have Universal Healthcare doesn't mean it is a prefer system. The Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for everyones elses health. Only pay for their own.


What about contagious diseases? It makes sense to fund vaccines out of a general revenue source since the health of the entire community is at stake.

ruveyn


It signed into law constitutionally then yes I am all for it.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,219
Location: the island of defective toy santas

06 Jul 2012, 8:23 pm

Joker wrote:
I have heard good things. About the Netherlands Healthcare system. But in Canada I bet the wait at the doctors office. Is longer then it is in Amercia.

if you're yank working class then chances are very good that your wait will be far longer than the worst case scenario up north.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

06 Jul 2012, 8:43 pm

ruveyn wrote:
noname_ever wrote:

It's a simple mechanic. You can vote to get more out of the system than what you contribute. It's due to people voting in their self interest instead of the good of society. Those without much skin in the game do it as much as those paying into the system.


If someone is getting more out of the system than they contribute, someone is getting less out of the system than they contribute.

This system runs on people who produce a lot and receive less than they produce.

ruveyn


that assumes the system is zero sum, it isnt it can generate value through its citizens, not enough variables accounted for for the mechanic to be viable as is.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


VIDEODROME
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,691

06 Jul 2012, 8:44 pm

I think some of the culture here has many causes. In some ways when people do manage to get a job they are overworked as well as being receiving low compensation for their labor. Maybe people just feel short on both time and money and on top of that stressed.

Also for a variety of reasons people are adopting a Multitasking lifestyle. They're juggling their smart phone and social networking with work and family and they cut corners on personal time. Often they probably make up time by getting food to go. Some of it is McDonalds but much of it is probably sugary Starbucks Lattes or Monster Energy Drinks and RedBulls.

Some Americans need to slow down and really deserve more true vacation time. Others need to seriously unplug from Facebook.

I also sometimes wonder about American food in general. I mean what if someone decides to be healthier and chooses a Breakfast Cereal. Many choices branded as healthy have plenty of sugar in them. Or other foods are "Fortified" by basically injecting vitamins into what was otherwise BS food.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

06 Jul 2012, 8:46 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Joker wrote:
I have heard good things. About the Netherlands Healthcare system. But in Canada I bet the wait at the doctors office. Is longer then it is in Amercia.

if you're yank working class then chances are very good that your wait will be far longer than the worst case scenario up north.


In the South' "where I am from' the wait is even longer.