Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
You know part of me wishes he wasn't a public figure, so he could actually sue people for defamation of charecter...
Then again, I think it would be fairly easy to prove that people floating this b.s. are doing it out of malice...
Huh? I think the sleaze charge can be easily demonstrated.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
It could be directed at just about anyone, what's your point?
No, it could not. One just has to look at Murdoch's publications, and salacious show on Fox (which I admit, I've watched) to prove he deals in sleaze. Most of us don't have to worry about being painted with the same brush.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer, if someone did enough digging I'm sure they could find something in your life to accuse you of being sleazy.
I don't think the man is a saint, but trying to demonize the man simply cause you disagree with him politically doesn't speak highly of you (not just directed at you). Before people start about my criticism of George Soros, I actually am looking at things he's done, I'm not bashing the guy simply cause he is a liberal and supports liberal causes.
I'm talking about how Murdoch actually sells sex and scandal solely for the sake of titillation, not his political affiliation. When I say Fox, I'm not talking about his news service, but about shows on his entertainment wing, such as
Married With Children (which I admit to watching when it was on). Then there's how he cheated on his wife, then left her for a younger model. That seems to be common with the moralizing right.
And as for me having something to hide - well, stuff that's more embarrassing than career killing or life altering

. But I'm not going to expose myself to the public eye like Rupert does.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer