Did a bit of digging:
1.
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/krs/039a00/285.pdf"The safety and security of the Commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from
reliance upon Almighty God as set forth in the public speeches and proclamations of American Presidents, including Abraham Lincoln's historic March 30, 1863, Presidential Proclamation urging Americans to pray and fast during one of the most dangerous hours in American history, and the text of President John F. Kennedy's November 22, 1963, national security speech which concluded: "For as was written long ago: 'Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain."
2.
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/krs/039g00/010.pdf"(1) The Kentucky Office of Homeland Security shall be attached to the Office of the Governor and shall be headed by an executive director appointed by the Governor.
(2)
The executive director shall:
(a) Publicize the findings of the General Assembly
stressing the dependence on Almighty God as being vital to the security of the Commonwealth by including the provisions of KRS 39A.285(3) in its agency training and educational materials. The executive director shall also be responsible for prominently
displaying a permanent plaque at the entrance to the state's Emergency Operations Center stating the text of KRS 39A.285(3);"
3.
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/krs/039a00/990.PDF"Any person violating any provision of this chapter or any administrative regulation or order promulgated pursuant to this chapter for which another penalty is not specified shall be guilty of a
Class A misdemeanor."
4.
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/KRS/532-00/090.PDF"For a Class A misdemeanor, the term shall not exceed
twelve (12) months"
The 1st one is a bit of a *so what?*. It is difficult to prosecute anyone of violating it, because how *does* one violate it?
The 2nd one seems to be in direct violation of article VI in the US constitution, however, as it makes a religious belief mandatory for assuming the office of executive director of The Kentucky Office of Homeland Security.
The 3rd one attaches a sentence equivalent to a class A misdemeanor (and the 4th one defines the maximum sentence) for violating a provision of chapter 39
a, but not 39
g, so my initial assessment is that it would be quite difficult to convict anyone of violating these provisions.
In other words, more than a "no biggie", but less than a worst case scenario involving the combined powers of all the horsemen of the Scourge.
Would still like to see the 2nd one getting torn apart by the Supreme Court, though.
Ridiculous law. Where, when and how has anyone been arrested or indicted or convicted under this law.