Good ol' Buddhism...
Tequila wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
I'm a "sorta" Zen Buddhist / Atheist / Advaita Vedantist.
Are you just an atheist that feels like you want to believe in something spiritual and esoteric, that there is something a little more refined and greater than just bog-standard "no God"ism?
No, it is more complicated than that. It would take a very long reply to try to explain. I have no desire to "believe" in anything, I simply seek to understand existence on more than one level. Science provides objective tools to that end and meditation provides "subjective" tools. My personal "philosophy" closely resembles that of Zen Buddhism & Advaita Vedanta in as much that my own approach coincides with Zen Buddhism and Jnana yoga of Hindus.
As a very crude analogy, science can tell me what an apple looks like, what it weighs, its biology and biochemistry, its DNA and various other facts such as its hardness, percentage water composition and so on. What science cannot tell me is what an apple tastes like. "Taste" is an emergent property of the relationship between the apple and my taste buds and brain and is purely experiential. Zen/ meditation is a tool that allows me to delve into the nature of subjective reality and consciousness.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
TallyMan wrote:
Tequila wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
I'm a "sorta" Zen Buddhist / Atheist / Advaita Vedantist.
Are you just an atheist that feels like you want to believe in something spiritual and esoteric, that there is something a little more refined and greater than just bog-standard "no God"ism?
No, it is more complicated than that. It would take a very long reply to try to explain. I have no desire to "believe" in anything, I simply seek to understand existence on more than one level. Science provides objective tools to that end and meditation provides "subjective" tools. My personal "philosophy" closely resembles that of Zen Buddhism & Advaita Vedanta in as much that my own approach coincides with Zen Buddhism and Jnana yoga of Hindus.
As a very crude analogy, science can tell me what an apple looks like, what it weighs, its biology and biochemistry, its DNA and various other facts such as its hardness, percentage water composition and so on. What science cannot tell me is what an apple tastes like. "Taste" is an emergent property of the relationship between the apple and my taste buds and brain and is purely experiential. Zen/ meditation is a tool that allows me to delve into the nature of subjective reality and consciousness.
Me too! What he said.
As with any spiritual teaching, the lessons of the Buddha have been interpreted and reinterpreted where some people quibble or worse over differing interpretations, but the bottom line is direct experience. All the teachings are but hints, like a finger pointing at the moon (famous Zen example).
When I was young, I tried to learn everything about everything. I read many thousands of books on every subject but mainly focusing on history and science my first thirty years. But I found the limitations to these fields, and in my thirties I studied much comparative mythology and Native American cultures, and in my forties I dove deep into eastern philosophies (Hinduism, Taoism, Buddhism). One of my favorite philosophers and teachers is Alan Watts (1915-1973), but I don't agree with everything he or anyone else says.
_________________
"When you ride over sharps, you get flats!"--The Bicycling Guitarist, May 13, 2008
TheBicyclingGuitarist wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Tequila wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
I'm a "sorta" Zen Buddhist / Atheist / Advaita Vedantist.
Are you just an atheist that feels like you want to believe in something spiritual and esoteric, that there is something a little more refined and greater than just bog-standard "no God"ism?
No, it is more complicated than that. It would take a very long reply to try to explain. I have no desire to "believe" in anything, I simply seek to understand existence on more than one level. Science provides objective tools to that end and meditation provides "subjective" tools. My personal "philosophy" closely resembles that of Zen Buddhism & Advaita Vedanta in as much that my own approach coincides with Zen Buddhism and Jnana yoga of Hindus.
As a very crude analogy, science can tell me what an apple looks like, what it weighs, its biology and biochemistry, its DNA and various other facts such as its hardness, percentage water composition and so on. What science cannot tell me is what an apple tastes like. "Taste" is an emergent property of the relationship between the apple and my taste buds and brain and is purely experiential. Zen/ meditation is a tool that allows me to delve into the nature of subjective reality and consciousness.
Me too! What he said.
As with any spiritual teaching, the lessons of the Buddha have been interpreted and reinterpreted where some people quibble or worse over differing interpretations, but the bottom line is direct experience. All the teachings are but hints, like a finger pointing at the moon (famous Zen example).
When I was young, I tried to learn everything about everything. I read many thousands of books on every subject but mainly focusing on history and science my first thirty years. But I found the limitations to these fields, and in my thirties I studied much comparative mythology and Native American cultures, and in my forties I dove deep into eastern philosophies (Hinduism, Taoism, Buddhism). One of my favorite philosophers and teachers is Alan Watts (1915-1973), but I don't agree with everything he or anyone else says.
Add me to this Zen dog pile.
I just see "Zen" as a way to look at the universe. It's a helpful framework in which to interpret my subjective experience of being human.
I've tried other philosophies, but, so far, Zen's the only point-of-view that seems to withstand my most thorough nitpicking and criticism. It's also perfectly in line with my, "Whatever will be will be," mindset.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
XFilesGeek wrote:
I've tried other philosophies, but, so far, Zen's the only point-of-view that seems to withstand my most thorough nitpicking and criticism. It's also perfectly in line with my, "Whatever will be will be," mindset.
Agreed, though I'd express it more as "Whatever is, IS"; or less cryptically reality is whatever it is, it is for us to uncover that reality rather than create (or absorb) belief systems as to what we may fancifully want reality to be.
The teachings of Jiddu Krishnamurti also sync pretty well with this philosophy too.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
TallyMan wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
I've tried other philosophies, but, so far, Zen's the only point-of-view that seems to withstand my most thorough nitpicking and criticism. It's also perfectly in line with my, "Whatever will be will be," mindset.
Agreed, though I'd express it more as "Whatever is, IS"; or less cryptically reality is whatever it is, it is for us to uncover that reality rather than create (or absorb) belief systems as to what we may fancifully want reality to be.
The teachings of Jiddu Krishnamurti also sync pretty well with this philosophy too.
I'll have to look him up.
Thanks.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
Wait a minute?
I thought it sucked? 
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...
TallyMan wrote:
MrXxx wrote:
Wait a minute?
I thought it sucked?
I thought it sucked?

No, that is Hoovers or is it Dysons?
Eureka!!
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...
VIDEODROME wrote:
I feel similar to TallyMan but I'm going in a different direction with Taoism.
I suppose Taoism fills the "Gaps" that science doesn't quite cover. The way an Apple tastes might just be described as the Tao of the Apple.
I suppose Taoism fills the "Gaps" that science doesn't quite cover. The way an Apple tastes might just be described as the Tao of the Apple.
The taste of the apple is reality at the moment you have it in your mouth, I think.
If an apple is not being eaten, does it still have a taste?
puddingmouse wrote:
The taste of the apple is reality at the moment you have it in your mouth, I think.
If an apple is not being eaten, does it still have a taste?
If an apple is not being eaten, does it still have a taste?
That boils down to the semantics of "taste"; people usually mean that if you where to eat it, it will have that taste.
puddingmouse wrote:
VIDEODROME wrote:
I feel similar to TallyMan but I'm going in a different direction with Taoism.
I suppose Taoism fills the "Gaps" that science doesn't quite cover. The way an Apple tastes might just be described as the Tao of the Apple.
I suppose Taoism fills the "Gaps" that science doesn't quite cover. The way an Apple tastes might just be described as the Tao of the Apple.
The taste of the apple is reality at the moment you have it in your mouth, I think.
If an apple is not being eaten, does it still have a taste?
In my opinion, no. Because what it tastes like depends on your brain, not on the apple itself.
MCalavera wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
VIDEODROME wrote:
I feel similar to TallyMan but I'm going in a different direction with Taoism.
I suppose Taoism fills the "Gaps" that science doesn't quite cover. The way an Apple tastes might just be described as the Tao of the Apple.
I suppose Taoism fills the "Gaps" that science doesn't quite cover. The way an Apple tastes might just be described as the Tao of the Apple.
The taste of the apple is reality at the moment you have it in your mouth, I think.
If an apple is not being eaten, does it still have a taste?
In my opinion, no. Because what it tastes like depends on your brain, not on the apple itself.
True. It's perception so how can anyone possibly know? We are so limited by our senses.
