The lethal combination of intelligence and insanity.
Since there is no reliable way of spotting addled folk like him, we have to deal with the damage they do after the fact. Having a compulsory test for being sociopathic or psychopathic would be an open invitation to institutionalize anyone who deviates from the "social norm". It would be a means by which the government could remove anyone who disagrees with its policies on the grounds that such disagreement is "sociopathic". The Soviets used to do this. Any political divergence was "diagnose" as a form of insanity and the person having such troublesome views was wrapped up in a straight jacket.
ruveyn
psychopaths have no emotions, so they are able to plan better because they won't get impulsive or emotional and lose site of their agenda. They have a goal and manipulate anyone to get it. The legal definition of insanity is that the person doesn't know right from wrong so they just don't know that what they did is against the law. Regular crazy people don't plan stuff like this. I've known some really smart people who go through all sorts of schemes to make money and I can't understand why they don't apply their street smarts to getting something done to make a legitimate living. I think sociopaths have a perverseness that makes them feel better about themselves when they outsmart society. Psychopaths wouldn't care to risk their well being, but a mixture of both sociopath and psychopath is a bad combination.
Huh, I would have put it much more simplistically, that it's too bad he didn't use his intelligence for good instead of evil. I don't know if it was mental illness or flawed character, I suspect a combination of the two. But it certainly has sealed his fate, as well, unfortunately, as those of his victims. That's the sad part.
"A man's character is his fate." - Heraclitus
It seems James Holmes' fate is to rot in prison or a mental institution. So much for intelligence.
_________________
Female
INFP
Since there is no reliable way of spotting addled folk like him, we have to deal with the damage they do after the fact. Having a compulsory test for being sociopathic or psychopathic would be an open invitation to institutionalize anyone who deviates from the "social norm". It would be a means by which the government could remove anyone who disagrees with its policies on the grounds that such disagreement is "sociopathic". The Soviets used to do this. Any political divergence was "diagnose" as a form of insanity and the person having such troublesome views was wrapped up in a straight jacket.
ruveyn
psychopaths have no emotions, so they are able to plan better because they won't get impulsive or emotional and lose site of their agenda. They have a goal and manipulate anyone to get it. The legal definition of insanity is that the person doesn't know right from wrong so they just don't know that what they did is against the law. Regular crazy people don't plan stuff like this. I've known some really smart people who go through all sorts of schemes to make money and I can't understand why they don't apply their street smarts to getting something done to make a legitimate living. I think sociopaths have a perverseness that makes them feel better about themselves when they outsmart society. Psychopaths wouldn't care to risk their well being, but a mixture of both sociopath and psychopath is a bad combination.
Huh, I would have put it much more simplistically, that it's too bad he didn't use his intelligence for good instead of evil. I don't know if it was mental illness or flawed character, I suspect a combination of the two. But it certainly has sealed his fate, as well, unfortunately, as those of his victims. That's the sad part.
"A man's character is his fate." - Heraclitus
It seems James Holmes' fate is to rot in prison or a mental institution. So much for intelligence.
lol,
umm, well it's more than that, insanity by definition means that you can't tell the difference between right actions or wrong actions, good/bad, but a psychopath does know when he is breaking a law. A crazy person has no understanding of laws. A sociopath enjoys breaking social rules just for kicks or personal gain while a psychopath is much more controlled in his actions and less emotional/impulsive.
psychopaths have no emotions
Not so. They are afraid of being caught and punished. That is an emotion. They plan carefully to avoid being caught.
ruveyn
I wonder if psychopaths have fear. I've seen some face to face that don't show emotion, like they are sharks. Sharks avoid nets out of fear? Maybe.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,260
Location: the island of defective toy santas
in any case, it is a monumental waste of good potential. what is it about our culture which turns so many souls to the dark side? why did ted kaczkinski [a maths genius specializing in boundary functions] turn to the dark side? why could he not have been salvaged? why could lanza have not been salvaged? why do we allow this wholesale waste of potential to continue? what is it profiting us as a society?
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I still think there was something fishy about that whole thing, so I am still not sure how to feel about it. Mostly I wonder if he acted completely alone or not. So not so sure this is a case of the dangers of madness and intelligence existing together.
_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.
Brevik, dad was a foreign diplomat
Holmes, dad brilliant lecturer
Lanza, dad million a year executive
LizNY yes
but decent parenting may offset this insanity
how many of these fathers are undiagnosed PDDers???????
maybe they think: I'm brilliant so I dont need to parent correctly.........
or cant due to emotional disturbances
[or an overly material agenda and focus on the world stage- no emotional room or time for little Jimmy]
here's a video game and movie to keep you occupied
Perhaps. These fathers could be poor parents. Or these wildly successful fathers may set the success bar far too high for their offspring and demand this success out of them. and in response, their kids may lash out in disturbing ways that they believe will show their brains and power since these kids believe (and possibly truly so) that they will never meet the expectations of their parents and the surrounding community/society. in earlier generations, kids in similar situations rebelled and fell into slacker mode. but i have to wonder if these tragedies are created out of similar family circumstances as the larger society ever increasingly focuses on success at all costs.
_________________
Aspie: 166/200
NT: 57/200
AQ: 41/50
the dark side is so easy and fun compared to all the hard work and personal awareness that goes into being good.
Maybe the answer to these questions is that nature is lazy and it's as simple as that.
Since there is no reliable way of spotting addled folk like him, we have to deal with the damage they do after the fact. Having a compulsory test for being sociopathic or psychopathic would be an open invitation to institutionalize anyone who deviates from the "social norm". It would be a means by which the government could remove anyone who disagrees with its policies on the grounds that such disagreement is "sociopathic". The Soviets used to do this. Any political divergence was "diagnose" as a form of insanity and the person having such troublesome views was wrapped up in a straight jacket.
ruveyn
psychopaths have no emotions, so they are able to plan better because they won't get impulsive or emotional and lose site of their agenda. They have a goal and manipulate anyone to get it. The legal definition of insanity is that the person doesn't know right from wrong so they just don't know that what they did is against the law. Regular crazy people don't plan stuff like this. I've known some really smart people who go through all sorts of schemes to make money and I can't understand why they don't apply their street smarts to getting something done to make a legitimate living. I think sociopaths have a perverseness that makes them feel better about themselves when they outsmart society. Psychopaths wouldn't care to risk their well being, but a mixture of both sociopath and psychopath is a bad combination.
Huh, I would have put it much more simplistically, that it's too bad he didn't use his intelligence for good instead of evil. I don't know if it was mental illness or flawed character, I suspect a combination of the two. But it certainly has sealed his fate, as well, unfortunately, as those of his victims. That's the sad part.
"A man's character is his fate." - Heraclitus
It seems James Holmes' fate is to rot in prison or a mental institution. So much for intelligence.
lol,
umm, well it's more than that, insanity by definition means that you can't tell the difference between right actions or wrong actions, good/bad, but a psychopath does know when he is breaking a law. A crazy person has no understanding of laws. A sociopath enjoys breaking social rules just for kicks or personal gain while a psychopath is much more controlled in his actions and less emotional/impulsive.
I'm not sure I believe in "insanity" applying in cases that are so premeditated. Someone whose thoughts are organized enough to plan something so elaborate without blabbing about it in advance knows that what he's planning is wrong.
_________________
Female
INFP
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,260
Location: the island of defective toy santas
psychopaths have no emotions
Not so. They are afraid of being caught and punished. That is an emotion. They plan carefully to avoid being caught.
ruveyn
psychopath's have no emotions when the run through with whatever act they're committing in order to get that title, all that matters is hurting someone.
sociopath's also seem to have a lack of emotion, but they however tend to think their crimes out or go with the subtle and indirect approach, e.g. turning people against one another. which makes them a little more dangerous in most situations.
with the cases that are televised, it's hard to tell who is who when you get nutcases such as Brevrick and Holmes who could have planned ahead looking for as many deaths as possible, or it could just have been a random shooting. did they know they were going to get caught? where were they off to next? most of the questions never get answered.
the dark side is so easy and fun compared to all the hard work and personal awareness that goes into being good.
Maybe the answer to these questions is that nature is lazy and it's as simple as that.
I disagree. I find being good to be a lot easier than being bad. And a lot less stressful.
_________________
Female
INFP
