Poll: 2/3 of American voters would defy gun laws

Page 2 of 9 [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

28 Jan 2013, 3:49 pm

/\
Guns are selling as fast as they can be stocked, especially "dangerous assault weapons" :roll:, magazines for them, and ammo.
I saw a guy grab up 2 cases (2000 rounds) of 5.56mm (what AR-15's shoot) last week without even looking at the price.
And you are right, they are buying them to KEEP.

Mosin Nagants have always been a hot item.
30-06 ballistics in a plain com-block rifle at a price anyone can afford.
Most shops that carry them buy them by the crate.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

28 Jan 2013, 4:24 pm

All of which serves to reinforce my view that what's called for is not a change of legal status, but a change of culture.

If the advocates of new legislation were to spend their time, money and effort on influencing public perception, and to maintain a sustained campaign to capture the hearts and minds of Americans, they would do far more to stem the epidemic of firearms violence than any legislation.

That's not to say that legislation is useless--it is an important tool in government's arsenal for protecting the public peace. But it is not a panacea that will cure the illness currently infecting the United States.


_________________
--James


trollcatman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,919

28 Jan 2013, 4:24 pm

If only those old soviet leaders knew they are arming American citizens for very low prices 8)

Words lose their meaning so quickly. I understood assault rifle to mean a selective-fire rifle; if it has no full-auto fire it is not really an assault rifle. But a couple of days ago there was some hysterical woman on tv referring to AR15s as "assault weapons of mass destruction".



J-Greens
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 669

28 Jan 2013, 6:22 pm

I just want to say thank you to some of the users on here. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, and let's keep digging towards it. 8)



JBlitzen
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 364
Location: Rochester, NY

28 Jan 2013, 7:42 pm

visagrunt wrote:
All of which serves to reinforce my view that what's called for is not a change of legal status, but a change of culture.

If the advocates of new legislation were to spend their time, money and effort on influencing public perception, and to maintain a sustained campaign to capture the hearts and minds of Americans, they would do far more to stem the epidemic of firearms violence than any legislation.

That's not to say that legislation is useless--it is an important tool in government's arsenal for protecting the public peace. But it is not a panacea that will cure the illness currently infecting the United States.

What on earth makes you think that the advocates of this new legislation aren't BEHIND the epidemic of firearms violence? They're taking money from the drug trade that profits from gang violence.

It's as if you don't understand why someone in a position of power would want his own citizens made completely helpless.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

28 Jan 2013, 8:37 pm

visagrunt wrote:
All of which serves to reinforce my view that what's called for is not a change of legal status, but a change of culture.

What specifically are you referring to when you say "culture"?

visagrunt wrote:
If the advocates of new legislation were to spend their time, money and effort on influencing public perception, and to maintain a sustained campaign to capture the hearts and minds of Americans, they would do far more to stem the epidemic of firearms violence than any legislation.

The reason people are stocking up with guns and ammo right now isn't for fear of active shooters but out of mistrust of our government.
And there is no "epidemic of firearms violence" here. I live here and I don't find myself particularly in fear of it beyond exercising general caution.

visagrunt wrote:
That's not to say that legislation is useless--it is an important tool in government's arsenal for protecting the public peace. But it is not a panacea that will cure the illness currently infecting the United States.

"Illness infecting the United States", eh?
:roll:


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

28 Jan 2013, 8:46 pm

trollcatman wrote:
If only those old soviet leaders knew they are arming American citizens for very low prices 8)

Yeah, it kinda goes against the grain of communism to have the peasants armed.

trollcatman wrote:
Words lose their meaning so quickly. I understood assault rifle to mean a selective-fire rifle; if it has no full-auto fire it is not really an assault rifle. But a couple of days ago there was some hysterical woman on tv referring to AR15s as "assault weapons of mass destruction".

Yes, an assault rifle is selective fire. An AR-15 is a semi-auto only rifle so the term doesnt apply.
The antis throw it up there anyways because it sounds skeery and might get them some points with the clueless.
Yeppers, calling an AR-15 a weapon of mass destruction is hysterical. That should be given as an example of hysteria in every dictionary.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


MadMonkey
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 118

28 Jan 2013, 8:56 pm

Just for the record, no one has suggested a single law that would take guns away from people. The laws that have been discussed will make it harder to buy some types of guns, in the future.

I have guns. No one is trying to take them away. If you believe that people are coming to take your guns you are either ignorant about what the policies actually are, OR you are a paranoid delusional person in which case you should not have access to guns.

I am sane, trained and safe. I have nothing to worry about from the government, but I am pretty worried about all the nut jobs who think they have the right to overthrow the government that I elected.



MadMonkey
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 118

28 Jan 2013, 9:17 pm

I feel like that last post might imply that I support the current batch of suggested gun laws. I do not. I agree that an assault weapons ban will do nothing to combat gun violence, but I am really tired of how the NRA and company are lying about what the administration is actually doing.

I would not ban AR-15s or high capacity clips. My solution and my philosophy are guns are simple.

When you take possession of a firearm, you are taking on a great responsibility to all the people around you. Every gun is deadly (and guns most definitely kill people), and so you need to:

1) Know exactly how to use it and be able to prove that you are a great shot.
2) Know where it is at all times
3) Properly care for and clean it to avoid accidents
4) Keep it secured where only you, or others you designate to use it have access to it.
5) Keep it registered, so at any time we know exactly where each legal gun is.
6) Follow all rules regarding responsible, lawful and careful carrying.

Violating any of these rules should result in a permanent loss of gun rights. If people want, there could be a warning, or even a 3 strikes thing.

But the most important law should be this: Any bullet fired from your gun, BY ANYONE, is treated as if you fired it intentionally. If someone kills someone with your gun, you committed first degree murder. In many states that will result in your execution.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,801
Location: the island of defective toy santas

28 Jan 2013, 9:52 pm

to borrow from kipling, "east is east, west is west, and never the twain shall meet." gun lovers and gun haters will never agree on anything other than the fact that they will never agree on anything. all this pissing contest is accomplishing is a great waste of time.



JBlitzen
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 364
Location: Rochester, NY

28 Jan 2013, 9:59 pm

MadMonkey wrote:
Just for the record, no one has suggested a single law that would take guns away from people.

Haha, yes they have.

Don't start your posts out with a lie.



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

28 Jan 2013, 10:13 pm

MadMonkey wrote:
I feel like that last post might imply that I support the current batch of suggested gun laws. I do not. I agree that an assault weapons ban will do nothing to combat gun violence, but I am really tired of how the NRA and company are lying about what the administration is actually doing.

I would not ban AR-15s or high capacity clips. My solution and my philosophy are guns are simple.

When you take possession of a firearm, you are taking on a great responsibility to all the people around you. Every gun is deadly (and guns most definitely kill people), and so you need to:

1) Know exactly how to use it and be able to prove that you are a great shot.
2) Know where it is at all times
3) Properly care for and clean it to avoid accidents
4) Keep it secured where only you, or others you designate to use it have access to it.
5) Keep it registered, so at any time we know exactly where each legal gun is.
6) Follow all rules regarding responsible, lawful and careful carrying.

Violating any of these rules should result in a permanent loss of gun rights. If people want, there could be a warning, or even a 3 strikes thing.

But the most important law should be this: Any bullet fired from your gun, BY ANYONE, is treated as if you fired it intentionally. If someone kills someone with your gun, you committed first degree murder. In many states that will result in your execution.
most states require gun safety training to own a gun.massachusetts requires almost everything on your list to get an FID card(firearms indentification)vermpnt requires gun safety training to buy a hand gun and all states require a hunter safety coarse to get a hunting license


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

28 Jan 2013, 10:28 pm

MadMonkey wrote:
Just for the record, no one has suggested a single law that would take guns away from people. The laws that have been discussed will make it harder to buy some types of guns, in the future.
I have guns. No one is trying to take them away. If you believe that people are coming to take your guns you are either ignorant about what the policies actually are, OR you are a paranoid delusional person in which case you should not have access to guns.

Not “taking” as in nationwide door to door because that’s logistically impossible. What they could possibly do, though, is ban certain types (make transfer or even possession illegal) and that would have a very nasty impact over time.
Just waiting for the law to swoop down, for whatever reason, and find my illegal AR-15 or AK or have someone blackmail me over it is no way to go through life.

MadMonkey wrote:
I am sane, trained and safe. I have nothing to worry about from the government, but I am pretty worried about all the nut jobs who think they have the right to overthrow the government that I elected.

You mean suppression of tyranny like we're supposed to do?

MadMonkey wrote:
I feel like that last post might imply that I support the current batch of suggested gun laws. I do not. I agree that an assault weapons ban will do nothing to combat gun violence, but I am really tired of how the NRA and company are lying about what the administration is actually doing.

Could it be that we’re un-trusting of a government that with one hand wants to curtail or gun rights but with the other hand illegally smuggles guns across the Mexican border?

MadMonkey wrote:
I would not ban AR-15s or high capacity clips. My solution and my philosophy are guns are simple.
When you take possession of a firearm, you are taking on a great responsibility to all the people around you. Every gun is deadly (and guns most definitely kill people) .
,
BS: Does a lug wrench loosen lug nuts? No, the user uses the lug wrench as a tool to loosen the lug nuts.
How does a rifle do anything?

MadMonkey wrote:
and so you need to:
1) Know exactly how to use it and be able to prove that you are a great shot.

Great shot by who’s standards? Very very few people are great shots and neither am I. I’ve sent lots and lots of rounds down range including NRA and CMP sanctioned service rifle matches and I’m nowhere near being a great shot. Some swear they are a great shot until they get to the firing line where the wheat gets separated from the chaff. Seen it time and time again.
MadMonkey wrote:
2) Know where it is at all times.

It’s twelve o’clock. Do you know where your AR-15 is? :lol:
MadMonkey wrote:
3) Properly care for and clean it to avoid accidents .

Really grasping at straws now, eh?
MadMonkey wrote:
4) Keep it secured where only you, or others you designate to use it have access to it.

No, I think I’ll leave it leaning against my garage door with the flood lights pointed at it all night.
MadMonkey wrote:
5) Keep it registered, so at any time we know exactly where each legal gun is.

No, because registration leads to confiscation. Just ask and Australian. And who is “we”?
MadMonkey wrote:
6) Follow all rules regarding responsible, lawful and careful carrying.

The NRA that you hate so much has done more to promote safe and responsible handing than anyone else. As an NRA certified Range Safety Officer I know a little about this.

MadMonkey wrote:
Violating any of these rules should result in a permanent loss of gun rights. If people want, there could be a warning, or even a 3 strikes thing. .

So you want to revoke someone’s gun owning rights because they are not an expert rifleman or didn’t get quite all of the fouling out of the gas tube or bolt carrier of their AR?

Oh here we go. The Grand Finale! :cheers:
MadMonkey wrote:
But the most important law should be this: Any bullet fired from your gun, BY ANYONE, is treated as if you fired it intentionally. If someone kills someone with your gun, you committed first degree murder. In many states that will result in your execution.

So if someone steals (that’s a crime, btw) my AR out of my locked car or locked house and shoots someone (a felony in itself, btw) with it I go to death row? But if someone stole my car and ran someone else over it would be the thief’s fault, I bet…. :roll:

This is the news and current events forum so I’m being more civil than I would in PPR. I cut about 1/3 of the original draft out.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Last edited by Raptor on 28 Jan 2013, 11:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.

vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

28 Jan 2013, 11:21 pm

"MadMonkey"]

MadMonkey wrote:
Violating any of these rules should result in a permanent loss of gun rights. If people want, there could be a warning, or even a 3 strikes thing. .

So you want to revoke someone’s gun owning rights because they are not an expert rifleman or didn’t get quite all of the fouling out of the gas tube or bolt carrier of their AR?



i meant to address this in my post but raptor reminded me.
there is no real link between cleaning or lack there of and accidents.you would have to fire more rounds then i even know to cake the barrel and chamber so much powder,copper and lead that chamber pressures cause the gun to explode.it would be more likely to send chamber presures to high from actualy using to much cleaning chemicals or to much gun oil in the barrell
a gun would loose significantly noticable accuracy from excess fouling long before fouling could build up so much that it would send chamber presures so high that the gun could explode.

i dont see a need for the goverment to inspect the cleanlyness of everyones guns


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

29 Jan 2013, 6:28 am

Our Illness. American Culture.

Tyranny had been the Government Standard for thousands of years.

In a world first, we replaced it with Liberty.

We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, and endowed by their creator with inalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the Persuit of Happiness.

Each generation must water the Tree of Liberty, with the blood of tyrants and patriots.

Tyrants forbid speaking freely, publishing without permission, to assemble any group, and the ownership of arms.

Our charter made these the foundation of a new system of self rule.

They stand together as a group, as we do with arms to defend them.

Our Charter was strongly taken from the few that viewed self rule above all.

The Articles of the Brotherhood of the Coast, also called pirates, serving no flag but their own, Free Men and armed with the best weapons they could get, did have to make agreements that all would abide by.

They appointed a Captain to lead them, and could appoint another at any time.

These were the same on land, where men gathered on groups with arms, were subject to being hung by the Crown, and were only going to agree to what free armed men would agree to.

This is the Standard of the Constitution, Government is what the Free Citizens gathered with Arms say it is, and they have the right to replace it at any time. The Consent of the Governed.

Beyond that, the Church will have nothing to say about the Government.

No King, Noble, or Ruling Class will exist. All Offices will be appointed by the people for limited duration, and subject to recall.

This was agreed to and ratified by the armed citizens.

The Constitution does not mention guns. it mentions the right of the people to keep and bear arms. An ancestor of mine owned a small ship for trade, which had several cannon in the stern, chasing him a much larger ship could be sunk. Arms, the most powerful of the time, were a personal right.

So you may gather, speak, publish, and all points of view are welcome. We will defend your right to do so. The other side is, you must accept those rights for others, and never question their rights as enshrined in the Constitution. We will hear you out, your views are valued, but in the end we must be of one mind, so all must agree to abide by the view of the majority.

Minority rights are also in the Constitution.

Fair warning, calls for making the Pope King of America, or disarming the population for transport to the docks of England to be hung, are not going to be popular. Objecting to The Constitution, is mentioned in the Constitution, the only Crime, Treason, punishable by Death.

Welcome! Join us or die.



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

29 Jan 2013, 6:54 am

here is so much I want to reply to, but I don't know if I'll have time. This thread has been busier than I expected! :?


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud