Telekon wrote:
They may be inconsistent but they're not wrong.
No, they're using every stick they can find to bash Israel. One minute they're saying that no Jews should be allowed to 'invade' and 'occupy' Israel and that they should be forced out of Palestine, the next minute they're having a go at Israel for trying to stem the birthrate of Jews born in Israel.
You couldn't make it up.
Telekon wrote:
This is a disgraceful policy.
And I agree with you. After looking at the facts of the situation, I had to concede that this was a vile, discriminatory policy. I thought this was about non-Jewish African immigrants. It turns out that it refers to Ethiopian Jews making Aliyah under the Law of Return.
See my comments here:
Quote:
They [Beta Israel] make up nearly 1.8% of the population of Israel (130,000 people) and these people making Aliyah never had this treatment before. Which is why I find it so puzzling.
At least the Israelis have admitted that they have done this, which is something. Doesn't take away from their policy being repellent and I suspect that there were some very embarrassed faces yesterday.
And:
Tequila wrote:
Wow, I didn't know this.
That puts a very different spin on it and is indefensible.
Are you happy now? This is the third time I've dissed this abhorrent and, well, racist policy in this thread.
It's a good, legitimate criticism of Israel to make. It doesn't require demanding an end to the Jewish State, and it doesn't require supporting blowing people up in cafés and on buses. It just requires simple pointing out of an obvious wrong made by the Israeli government, which I'm sure they're quite embarrassed about and will now hastily rectify.
Telekon wrote:
Yet you have an uncritical attitude toward Israel that would make Avigdor Lieberman blush.
I wouldn't vote for Lieberman, I don't think.
I'm surprised you didn't go all-out as smearing me as, say, less moderate than Meir David Kahane. That's the usual response by the left to people on the right who mount a robust defence of something they don't agree with.
Telekon wrote:
Israel has lots of exclusionist laws on the books, especially when it comes to marriage and immigration.
What, you mean like Jews can't marry non-Jews in Israel? This is in accordance with Jewish law. I agree that that would be a nuisance for anyone living there that was attached to an Arab, but I don't consider it that much more problematic than, say, the situation of women in Malta or on the island of Ireland who want an abortion. Remember it's supposed to be a "Jewish and democratic state"? Jews who marry Arabs simply use it as an opportunity to go for a quick break in Cyprus instead. When they get back, their marriage is fully recognised in Israel. Much like Maltese women would use it as an excuse to go to Italy for an abortion or to go to the UK for a divorce (divorce is still illegal in Malta!). It's not perfect by any means and yes, and I can see how it's discriminatory. Oh, and Cyprus is the nearest free country geographically to Israel. Which says a lot about Arab countries, doesn't it.
Oh, and LGBT civil unions are completely legal in Israel. Fancy going to Gaza and asking Hamas, as a gay person, if you can marry your male partner in Gaza? If you make it back alive, let me know how it goes.
As a non-Jew I'd still far and away live in Tel Aviv or Haifa than, say, Gaza City or Hebron.
Telekon wrote:
Some of the Israeli courts adhere to Halakhah, which prescribes discriminatory treatment of non-Jews.
Examples please?
Kraichgauer wrote:
But I believe the Israeli leadership back in those days was not nearly as right wing as it is today.
Unfortunately, you'd be wrong. It was a right-wing Zionist governing coalition that oversaw the right of the Ethiopian Jews to settle in Israel. In fact, it was the first major Revisionist Zionist government in Israel, and the application of the Law of Return to apply to Ethiopian Jews was hastily effected as soon as Menachem Begin became Prime Minister.
Last edited by Tequila on 29 Jan 2013, 5:13 am, edited 1 time in total.