Page 2 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

08 Feb 2014, 8:46 pm

KagamineLen wrote:
I think that I am far more annoyed that the Church of Scientology was able to buy commercial airtime during the Super Bowl.

Frankly, I am surprised that it is the Coke commercial that is getting all of the outrage.


Their money is as good as yours.

ruveyn



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,166
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Feb 2014, 9:57 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
I don't remember this one:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zTDbpxT8ZI[/youtube]


By, my God, Coke is fueling our obesity epidemic. 8O


Can anyone say FALSE ADVERTISING?!?!?!?!?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

08 Feb 2014, 10:12 pm

/\
Let the buyer beware.
It should be obvious that anything with that much sugar in it isn't going to be particularly thinning.
That is, unless it had so much caffeine in it back then that it kept people uncontrollably on the go and burning off calories.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,166
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Feb 2014, 10:18 pm

Raptor wrote:
/\
Let the buyer beware.
It should be obvious that anything with that much sugar in it isn't going to be particularly thinning.
That is, unless it had so much caffeine in it back then that it kept people uncontrollably on the go and burning off calories.


It has to be recalled at the same time this commercial had been made, tobacco companies were claiming their product was perfectly safe and even healthy. Deliberate false advertisement can and does cause great harm to the public, and so just to say "buyer beware" just doesn't cut it.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

08 Feb 2014, 10:49 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
/\
Let the buyer beware.
It should be obvious that anything with that much sugar in it isn't going to be particularly thinning.
That is, unless it had so much caffeine in it back then that it kept people uncontrollably on the go and burning off calories.


It has to be recalled at the same time this commercial had been made, tobacco companies were claiming their product was perfectly safe and even healthy. Deliberate false advertisement can and does cause great harm to the public, and so just to say "buyer beware" just doesn't cut it.


Whatever, but I still maintain that the consumer has some responsibility of common sense.
It should be obvious that anyone with two brain cells to rub together that drinking sodapop in excess isn't going to be particularly healthy.
Moreover, it should be abundantly obvious that purposely inhaling just about any kind smoke in such high concentrations several times a day for months and years on end is unhealthy. The few that actually are that stupid; let's just call it natural selection and leave it at that.

I would absolutely love to see commercials like this on TV with NO disclaimers just to hear the handwringer's squawk over them. :twisted:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSSi1Sy-vug[/youtube]


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,166
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Feb 2014, 11:00 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
/\
Let the buyer beware.
It should be obvious that anything with that much sugar in it isn't going to be particularly thinning.
That is, unless it had so much caffeine in it back then that it kept people uncontrollably on the go and burning off calories.


It has to be recalled at the same time this commercial had been made, tobacco companies were claiming their product was perfectly safe and even healthy. Deliberate false advertisement can and does cause great harm to the public, and so just to say "buyer beware" just doesn't cut it.


Whatever, but I still maintain that the consumer has some responsibility of common sense.
It should be obvious that anyone with two brain cells to rub together that drinking sodapop in excess isn't going to be particularly healthy.
Moreover, it should be abundantly obvious that purposely inhaling just about any kind smoke in such high concentrations several times a day for months and years on end is unhealthy. The few that actually are that stupid; let's just call it natural selection and leave it at that.

I would absolutely love to see commercials like this on TV with NO disclaimers just to hear the handwringer's squawk over them. :twisted:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSSi1Sy-vug[/youtube]


What about products that shouldn't be harmful, but due to defect in manufacturing, are? Should companies be allowed to get away with that?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

08 Feb 2014, 11:16 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
What about products that shouldn't be harmful, but due to defect in manufacturing, are? Should companies be allowed to get away with that?


If your talking about something like defective brakes on a car that's different since there is no common sense to rely upon. You should be able to buy a product with reasonable expectation that it will work as intended. I can't help but wonder where you're going with this.... :?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

08 Feb 2014, 11:35 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
You can laugh all you want but immigrants should adopt the culture and language of the country they move to, assimilation and integration should be prioritized not segregation.


I thought that you were a Libertarian, anti-statist?


Libertarianism has a habit of empowering local bullies (i.e. bigoted nativists).

http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/2011 ... llies.html


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,166
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Feb 2014, 12:11 am

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
What about products that shouldn't be harmful, but due to defect in manufacturing, are? Should companies be allowed to get away with that?


If your talking about something like defective brakes on a car that's different since there is no common sense to rely upon. You should be able to buy a product with reasonable expectation that it will work as intended. I can't help but wonder where you're going with this.... :?


Where I'm going with this is, every product should be safe, and if it isn't, it shouldn't be advertized as being safe.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,138
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

09 Feb 2014, 12:42 am

Raptor wrote:
/\
Let the buyer beware.
It should be obvious that anything with that much sugar in it isn't going to be particularly thinning.
That is, unless it had so much caffeine in it back then that it kept people uncontrollably on the go and burning off calories.


At one point coca cola had cocaine in it.....that may burn of calories, not sure. Lol but maybe once they got rid of that ingredient it did have more caffeine than it does now.


_________________
Eat the rich, feed the poor. No not literally idiot, cannibalism is gross.


GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

09 Feb 2014, 9:24 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKMn-_aQoPk[/youtube]

This thread is brought to you by SMOKING...


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

09 Feb 2014, 11:01 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
What about products that shouldn't be harmful, but due to defect in manufacturing, are? Should companies be allowed to get away with that?


If your talking about something like defective brakes on a car that's different since there is no common sense to rely upon. You should be able to buy a product with reasonable expectation that it will work as intended. I can't help but wonder where you're going with this.... :?


Where I'm going with this is, every product should be safe, and if it isn't, it shouldn't be advertized as being safe.


Yeah, well some products are inherently dangerous and can only be made so safe. That's where common sense comes in.

Image


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,166
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Feb 2014, 11:27 am

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
What about products that shouldn't be harmful, but due to defect in manufacturing, are? Should companies be allowed to get away with that?


If your talking about something like defective brakes on a car that's different since there is no common sense to rely upon. You should be able to buy a product with reasonable expectation that it will work as intended. I can't help but wonder where you're going with this.... :?


Where I'm going with this is, every product should be safe, and if it isn't, it shouldn't be advertized as being safe.


Yeah, well some products are inherently dangerous and can only be made so safe. That's where common sense comes in.

Image


Sure, murdercycles are dangerous, but it's obvious. Smoking was not at one time so obvious - particularly with their advertising campaign. Call people naive, but they tend to believe what they're told.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

09 Feb 2014, 11:39 am

/\
It's obvious enough but I'll repeat what I said a few post ago.

Raptor wrote:
Moreover, it should be abundantly obvious that purposely inhaling just about any kind smoke in such high concentrations several times a day for months and years on end is unhealthy. The few that actually are that stupid; let's just call it natural selection and leave it at that.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,166
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Feb 2014, 5:05 pm

Raptor wrote:
/\
It's obvious enough but I'll repeat what I said a few post ago.
Raptor wrote:
Moreover, it should be abundantly obvious that purposely inhaling just about any kind smoke in such high concentrations several times a day for months and years on end is unhealthy. The few that actually are that stupid; let's just call it natural selection and leave it at that.


And yet it's more likely conservatives who deny there's anything dangerous about smoking. You want your friends to die off?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

09 Feb 2014, 7:49 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
/\
It's obvious enough but I'll repeat what I said a few post ago.
Raptor wrote:
Moreover, it should be abundantly obvious that purposely inhaling just about any kind smoke in such high concentrations several times a day for months and years on end is unhealthy. The few that actually are that stupid; let's just call it natural selection and leave it at that.


And yet it's more likely conservatives who deny there's anything dangerous about smoking. You want your friends to die off?

:roll:
Wut?
As I've said in this thread alone, it should be abundantly obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that purposely inhaling just about any kind smoke in such high concentrations several times a day for months or even years on end is clearly detrimental to ones health. It shouldn't matter who tells them what. Those few who are actually that goddamn stupid that they can't figure it out on their own can be casually written off as victims of natural selection.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson