Page 2 of 4 [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

JoeDaBro
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 434
Location: Solstice Rise, Amesbury

22 Mar 2014, 11:03 am

What is a liberal?



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

22 Mar 2014, 11:17 am

JoeDaBro wrote:
What is a liberal?

Well, in my native country of Denmark a Liberal is a person who advocates:

- Free markets
- Low taxes
- Low public expenditure
- Low public regulation

A Conservative person would likely advocate:

- Somewhat free markets
- Slightly lower taxes
- Slightly lower public expenditure
- Slightly increased public regulation



Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

22 Mar 2014, 11:17 am

It does seem heavily US-centric, which is to be expected, but as GGPViper notes, the US understanding/framing of a lot of issues doesn't always translate for other countries. If I can try and step back from my own opinions, I find the gun threads especially illuminating - ways of looking at the world that seem alien to almost any present UK political perspective.

From my very biased, selectively aware basis (the stuff likely to get my interest and occasional participation), the round and round we go topics seem to be:

Boo Christians
Boo religion
Boo evolution
Boo Feminists
Boo Muslims
Huzzah guns
Boo guns

Think I'll take a little time and look through, say, the past month's topics, see if this works out.

And I wonder how this compares to any similar, NT 'general' forums.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

22 Mar 2014, 11:58 am

If you go through the polls done here over the years, the forum does skew a bit left, but not overwhelming so, it's more a matter of the "volume" of individual posters.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

22 Mar 2014, 12:09 pm

Dox47 wrote:
If you go through the polls done here over the years, the forum does skew a bit left, but not overwhelming so, it's more a matter of the "volume" of individual posters.


So you are saying those leaning to the left are more vocal eh? :wink:


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

22 Mar 2014, 12:17 pm

TallyMan wrote:
So you are saying those leaning to the left are more vocal eh? :wink:


Some of them anyway, and there are a handful that enjoy conservative/religion baiting in their threads that creates a lot of the feeling of hostility on here.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Stannis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631

22 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
1. It's a spectrum disorder. :lol: :lol: :lol:

2. I was a liberal before I became a conservative.

What changed? I woke up and realized most of the stuff I believed were LIES. All the promises, all the "this is what life is like" that proved to be false, all of the social justice BS that was supposed to be there fore me and really was not nor ever was there for me...these things made me realize that I subscribed to a political ideology which was greatly askew with how REALITY operated.

At best, you could say they were too idealistic...stating the hope of a utopia as how thing actually are, but frankly, I see now that they love to fill people up with false hope so they are bitter and angry and demanding that the world is forced into a shape it will never hold without severe political oppression of anything that does not fit the ideology.

Not that conservatives aren't guilty of doing the same things....people with an agenda don't tend to play fair or honest, but the ideal of self-reliance, keeping government small and out of people's lives, and responsible economic policy are all proven to be beneficial to society in the long run.

Life isn't fair. You can't make it fair by passing or enforcing more and more laws to make it the way you want it to be. A big part of survival is adaptation to your surroundings. A utopia requires unlimited cheap energy and unlimited resources. We're not going to have that anytime soon, so a political ideology focused on creating a utopia rather than trying to do the best we can with what we have for the greatest number of people simply isn't going to work.


My friend, having principles, and championing those principles in the political domain does not make you utopian. The battle for social justice is a struggle that never ends. Economic Neo-Liberalism has been on the ascent since 80s, and we have seen many of our egalitarian and welfare state provisions cut back during that time. Be mindful that the public psyche of the present has been forged by a conscious social engineering effort and a vast public relations apparatus designed to eliminate certain human traits and promote others. The 1% want us to be confused and ignorant social darwinists because it makes us conform to their will and makes us weak politically. Submitting to their brainwashing only contributes to your own, and the greater societies degradation and enslavement.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTPYz_r6pq8[/youtube]



Last edited by Stannis on 22 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm, edited 5 times in total.

0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

22 Mar 2014, 2:29 pm

I find it bizarre that people equate liberal to left.

I think in the US they have adopted the wrong word for social democrat or socialist.

This is not was liberal about for most of history, even in the US. What is this cultural amnesia?

Possibly the reason for this was the cold war, there was a period of extreme paranoia of infiltration, created a reaction which forced the left (including the moderate left), somewhat underground or force to reinvent themselves as "liberal". This was a mistake even if you didn't agree with them, and this period was illiberal, and not representing the rights and principles the country was formed on.

On the other hand "liberals" (with an s) is intended to be derogatory, so I wonder if some "liberals" adopted this label after, like"Fauvism" in art.

Personally I would say liberal if I talking about an unspecific group of people, and Liberals if I was talking about members of a political party called the Liberal party. To my knowledge there is no major party with that name in the US currently.

Although I don't this the US was totally wrong, but I think the cold war and cold war propaganda, up until the late 80s, has contributed to greatly stupefying politics.

To the guy that said he has no problem with liberals as long as they don't try to infringe their rights, well I would hope not, that would be ironic an illiberal.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Mar 2014, 4:47 pm

AngelRho wrote:
Alex doesn't directly monitor the forums with any consistency, though. What exactly constitutes "racist, sexist, and homophobic language" is more of a fluid thing inconsistently interpreted among mods. "Homophobic language" could mean nothing more than someone saying "I believe homosexuality is immoral," or "I believe homosexuality is harmful to society." I've even been told by a mod that even if a discussion of religion directly deals with the topic of homosexuality being wrong we aren't allowed to discuss it. OK, fine by me…so why is it fair for someone to rail against Christianity/Bible/etc. if Christians aren't allowed to even defend the position being attacked? The TOS also says that users cannot provoke other users, so if this is the issue then the topic shouldn't even be brought up in the first place. The fact that this does happen from time to time with Christians barred by TOS from making counterarguments would make it appear that the site is left-leaning and unfriendly towards conservative viewpoints.

Personally, I don't really care that much about the issue of homosexuality and don't care to whine about it. I'm not gay, and those who are really can do pretty much whatever they want. I only pick on that topic because it HAS been used here to attack Christianity and I've gotten official warnings for participating in similar discussions. So if it isn't open for discussion, I won't discuss it; but it's equally wrong for someone holding the opposing viewpoint to mine to indiscriminately rant about the evils of Christianity in relation to homosexuality while the Christian perspective is silenced. It's provocative and, dare I say it, trollish for someone to bring it up if it can't be discussed.


I can see your point. But, from the other perspective, a Christian lecturing a homosexual about the evils of homosexuality (and I'm sure that many of them get plenty of that in real life) may be about as welcome as a Nazi lecturing a Jew on the evils of Judaism. It would be very hard to pull off without offending anyone.

Autistic homosexuals already have two big social strikes against them. So, I can see the wisdom in wanting to give them a break. Most of them already got picked on enough. No need to over-do it.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

22 Mar 2014, 4:52 pm

khaoz wrote:
You must not pay attention to some of the things people say about Obama (no, I did not vote for him, either time) but Conservatives are some of the most *#@& creatures in politics (especially Tea Party Conservatives) It seems as though NOTHING is out of bounds to them. The distortions, incendiary, provocative, disrespectful rhetoric. Absolutely no respect for the office of POTUS. And you talk about "hatred" toward Conservative. Conservatives, from my perspective, start off immediately with rhetoric designed to be threatening, intimidating and dehumanizing. If you want to see respect from me, then don't make references to Liberals that would insinuate we are beneath you, weak, spineless, lazy, freeloading "takers". Stop misrepresenting people who are on welfare, SNAP and other government assistance programs as if they are stealing from you. If you want to characterize a whole group of people by the actions of a few, and use that rhetoric to turn people against each other and then turn around and tell me that you are decent, God fearing, Christian blah, blah, blah, I am going to give it right back to you. The problem is, you expect Liberals to just sit and take the crap Conservatives bow into society because you view us as "weak and wimpy" because we actually believe in the principles that you try to tell us you stand for as far as caring about humanity. When we behave the same way Conservatives behave we are "haters."

Just because we may be soft spoken and mild mannered in appearance and demeanor does not mean we have to sit back and allow you to walk all over us. Your side of the coin wants to provoke and insult everyone in the world in order to demonstrate your "strength,." You use rhetoric that incites the people you refer to as enemies in order to create a situation that you can use to destroy this country just so you can blame the President for the things that your party is responsible for. Tea Party Conservatives would burn this country to the ground and start all over just to prove a point. You cannot peacefully co-exist with anyone. Everything has to be YOUR way. No compromise, no negotiation. Everything has to be a demonstration of power and strength to you. I cannot even "follow" a topic with Conservatives because you do not know or understand how to use words in any way other than to impose your ideology, and your religion.

This is my country every bit as much as it is your, even if I don't wave a flag in your face. And just because I don't personally need or care about guns dos not mean I want to "take away your right to own guns, yet Conservatives use these lies about Liberals wanting to "take away your 2nd Amendment rights," in order to scare people into believing your propaganda.

Now if I were one of your colleagues trying to make the same point about Liberals, I can guarantee you that the rhetoric would be deliberately and cunningly inflammatory and don't dare a Liberal use the same tone or we are being "divisive and hateful" for using the exact tone that Conservatives are known for the world over>

I am saying my piece and will not follow this topic further because I know exactly from experience the kind of deceitful denial and finger wagging gang bang I am going to get for this response. And I can guarantee that very few Liberals are going to step up and agree with what I say here. You have a blinder over your eyes if you think Liberals are being unfair on WP. We are not nearly as vociferous in our opinions as far right Conservatives are. It may not be in WP, but I routinely receive internet death threats (which, of course, are meaningless to you, after all, its just the internet) for merely standing behind a President I did not even vote for when I see the slander, bigotry and hatefulness directed toward him.

Thank you very much, I love you too. Have a wonderful day.

:roll: :roll:
Tell me this and your other typically caustic posts are all just an act.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Stannis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631

22 Mar 2014, 4:58 pm

Raptor wrote:
Tell me this and your other typically caustic posts are all just an act.


Ditto.

It's really hard to empathise with you guys when you don't outright state your position on anything except guns. I would like to know why you agree or disagree with things.



Last edited by Stannis on 22 Mar 2014, 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

heavenlyabyss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,393

22 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm

I'm not sure if I'm a liberal or not but sometimes I like to "shout" on the message boards about things that make no sense.

It's like I'll see something in the news and I'll think this is ret*d, and I don't know where else to go but these forums and make some stupid post about how stupid things are in the world.

I realize conservatives are people but there are a few things I have no respect for:

- intolerance towards gays
- belief that it is okay for people to keep dying at the hand of guns (hey, it happens, right?)
- belief that selfishness is a good virtue

I may be an idealist, but at least I have dignity. At least I tell the truth.

If liberals aren't allowed to speak out against what they deem to be unfair, then their freedom is being restricted, the same way conservatives feel their freedoms are being restricted (and I might add shout about it all the time as well). We are in a big shouting match right now which I think is actually a good thing. People are free to shout at each other (within reason).

Not sure that made sense or not.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

22 Mar 2014, 5:17 pm

Stannis wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Tell me this and your other typically caustic posts are all just an act.


Ditto.

It's really hard to empathise with you guys when you don't outright state your position on anything except guns. I would like to know why you disagree with things.


We state our positions on a lot more than just gun rights related issues. Apparently you arent looking at other topics. I, for one, do not reply to all threads. Trust me when I say it's better that I don't contribute to some topics.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Stannis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631

22 Mar 2014, 5:24 pm

Raptor wrote:
Stannis wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Tell me this and your other typically caustic posts are all just an act.


Ditto.

It's really hard to empathise with you guys when you don't outright state your position on anything except guns. I would like to know why you disagree with things.


We state our positions on a lot more than just gun rights related issues. Apparently you arent looking at other topics. I, for one, do not reply to all threads. Trust me when I say it's better that I don't contribute to some topics.


Not sure what that means.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

22 Mar 2014, 6:10 pm

khaoz wrote:
You must not pay attention to some of the things people say about Obama (no, I did not vote for him, either time) but Conservatives are some of the most *#@& creatures in politics (especially Tea Party Conservatives) It seems as though NOTHING is out of bounds to them. The distortions, incendiary, provocative, disrespectful rhetoric. Absolutely no respect for the office of POTUS. And you talk about "hatred" toward Conservative. Conservatives, from my perspective, start off immediately with rhetoric designed to be threatening, intimidating and dehumanizing. If you want to see respect from me, then don't make references to Liberals that would insinuate we are beneath you, weak, spineless, lazy, freeloading "takers". Stop misrepresenting people who are on welfare, SNAP and other government assistance programs as if they are stealing from you. If you want to characterize a whole group of people by the actions of a few, and use that rhetoric to turn people against each other and then turn around and tell me that you are decent, God fearing, Christian blah, blah, blah, I am going to give it right back to you. The problem is, you expect Liberals to just sit and take the crap Conservatives bow into society because you view us as "weak and wimpy" because we actually believe in the principles that you try to tell us you stand for as far as caring about humanity. When we behave the same way Conservatives behave we are "haters."

Just because we may be soft spoken and mild mannered in appearance and demeanor does not mean we have to sit back and allow you to walk all over us. Your side of the coin wants to provoke and insult everyone in the world in order to demonstrate your "strength,." You use rhetoric that incites the people you refer to as enemies in order to create a situation that you can use to destroy this country just so you can blame the President for the things that your party is responsible for. Tea Party Conservatives would burn this country to the ground and start all over just to prove a point. You cannot peacefully co-exist with anyone. Everything has to be YOUR way. No compromise, no negotiation. Everything has to be a demonstration of power and strength to you. I cannot even "follow" a topic with Conservatives because you do not know or understand how to use words in any way other than to impose your ideology, and your religion.

This is my country every bit as much as it is your, even if I don't wave a flag in your face. And just because I don't personally need or care about guns dos not mean I want to "take away your right to own guns, yet Conservatives use these lies about Liberals wanting to "take away your 2nd Amendment rights," in order to scare people into believing your propaganda.

Now if I were one of your colleagues trying to make the same point about Liberals, I can guarantee you that the rhetoric would be deliberately and cunningly inflammatory and don't dare a Liberal use the same tone or we are being "divisive and hateful" for using the exact tone that Conservatives are known for the world over>

I am saying my piece and will not follow this topic further because I know exactly from experience the kind of deceitful denial and finger wagging gang bang I am going to get for this response. And I can guarantee that very few Liberals are going to step up and agree with what I say here. You have a blinder over your eyes if you think Liberals are being unfair on WP. We are not nearly as vociferous in our opinions as far right Conservatives are. It may not be in WP, but I routinely receive internet death threats (which, of course, are meaningless to you, after all, its just the internet) for merely standing behind a President I did not even vote for when I see the slander, bigotry and hatefulness directed toward him.

Thank you very much, I love you too. Have a wonderful day.


I didn't read more then half your reply cause you labeled me a conservative(i'm not) then went on about the sterotype of conservatives(which is wrong)

I'm on welfare, food stamps etc. I see the use of them. I also am ok with abortions. Like I said if not for the anti gun pro letting anyone into the nation stuff of the left I would most likely be a liberal. as for the few topics about obama they tend to be swarmed with pro obama supporters fast. I don't dislike all liberals I know quite a few. you do seem to be the bad type though. liberals give death threats too you know? I have never threaten anyone but I have been threaten. He is our president, but being elected doesn't mean he can't be complained about or his bad things brought up. If you do something bad you need to be held accountable regardless if your the pop, president, or some bum on the street. we are all humans and equal.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

22 Mar 2014, 6:31 pm

Stannis wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Tell me this and your other typically caustic posts are all just an act.


Ditto.

It's really hard to empathise with you guys when you don't outright state your position on anything except guns. I would like to know why you agree or disagree with things.


I'm a democrat. I was raised as such. I agree with most of the party and liberal's ideals. unfortunately I enjoy my firearms. I wanted Gore in. I blindly liked clinton. the last 4 years have been non stop attacks on my rights. If we lose I lose my main interest, the stuff I need for protection, the one fun thing I have in my life that leads to friends, so I'm strongly for protecting it. while there are a few pro gun democrats(liberals) there are far more anti gun ones. so I will unfortunately support the republicans but I don't want either party in 100% control. I also see stuff black and whit as in the law is the law. The law says one must get a visa, become a citizen. Those people who just climbed over a fence are illegal immigrants, criminals, they broke the law. I do not support rewarding them for it as I wouldn't support giving a rapist $10k and letting him on his way. so I don't support Obama and some democrats plans of just making them citizens or giving them ids, it spits in the face of the law and those who worked hard to come here legally.

because of these two issues the left hates me, because of the others the right hates me. I am a registered democrat hated by my party. I',m more independent by force I guess. but here independents can't vote in the primaries. I would really like democrats to leave guns alone so I could escape the cruel violent world that is politics I was far happier living my life without know about all the horrible stuff that goes on in dc.