starvingartist wrote:
without food, water, oxygen, and (in certain climates) shelter from the elements, the chemical processes of life in the human body will cease.
without sex, but with all those other factors covered, the human animal trudges on.
sex is a want,
not a need. far too many men seem to make this (seriously problematic) assumption.
no one is entitled to sex (at least not with other people; everyone, however, is entitled to as much sex with themselves as they like).
so shut up and have a w*k and stop blaming us women for "not providing the basic needs".

Not at all where I was going.
I'd consider sex and human liberty (physical, intellectual, and spiritual) as being of the same class of need - ie. neither are fundamental for the body to survive.
Masturbation IS a fulfillment of sexual need and sexual need CANNOT trump human liberty (ie. physical autonomy) without creating a horribly unethical situation.
The reason this topic gets weird, or at least my best guess, is that the feeling is out there that if it gets expressed as a need, all of a sudden the word 'need' would legitimate having it legally mandated because masturbation would be seen as less optimal than intercourse and thus fall short. I don't believe in that kind of statist utopianism to begin with, part of why I suppose considering sex a need isn't a huge burr in my political or philosophical structure, but also if we do have even a shred of Victorian era masturbation-shaming still hanging around we really need to get over it - especially in a time and place where we panic about there being 7 billion people in the world.
my post wasn't specifically directed at you; it was for the sake of the many guys i have observed posting in this forum that seem to think that sex is a right they are being denied by selfish women.