Courts deny Medical Marijuana to dying woman.

Page 2 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

15 Mar 2007, 8:57 pm

Cyanide wrote:
No matter what you or her think, marijuana doesn't "stop" people from dying.


no....nothing stops people from dying...we all die eventually. marijuana can make the quality of life better for some sick people and improving quality of life does make you live longer...that's a fact.



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

15 Mar 2007, 8:58 pm

Quote:
There is an argument that can be made against legalizing drugs from a logically perspective. Additionally, all-out legalization even of marijuanna is not generally politically popular. Attempts at legalizing it have met with failure after an earlier success.


Its not popular because people fear it - they fear what they do not understand - its illegal because they fear it - people fear what they do not understand - its illegal because people fear it - etc...

Weed exists in such a high number now, legalizing it won't do much. Now, you're probably thinking 'everyone will run to it if you legalize it' or 'use will go up.' This is true, but should only be true for the short term. Anything you have banned and prevented people from, then removed the ban from, you have a sharp spike in its use. This is obvious and NOT limited to marijuana, its limited to anything. Its the "chaos" before the "order." I think people need to get it out of their system. They just fear it, is all.

I don't think you can use "logic" and "law against legalisation" in the same sentence. Making marijuana "illegal" (making the decision for people) is illogical to begin with. The removes freewill, removes choice, and ultimately makes us conform via force and not choice. Thats just my view.



jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

15 Mar 2007, 9:25 pm

Corvus wrote:
Its not popular because people fear it - they fear what they do not understand - its illegal because they fear it - people fear what they do not understand - its illegal because people fear it - etc...


Marijuana, like alcohol, causes brain damage. I think the mass regular usage of something (else) that causes brain damage would be bad for the population of the United States.

Corvus wrote:
Weed exists in such a high number now, legalizing it won't do much.

Now, you're probably thinking 'everyone will run to it if you legalize it' or 'use will go up.' This is true, but should only be true for the short term. Anything you have banned and prevented people from, then removed the ban from, you have a sharp spike in its use. This is obvious and NOT limited to marijuana, its limited to anything. Its the "chaos" before the "order." I think people need to get it out of their system. They just fear it, is all.


Prohibition caused a decrease in the usage of alcohol. Yes, there was an increase in crime, and a jump in locations of illegal bars and such, but absolute usage of alcohol dropped by 2/3 because most people followed the law. It shot back up when it was legalized (I think prohibition was a well-intention and bungled mistake BTW). Marijuanna use will become more common should it become legalized.

In addition, once marijuanna is legalized you will have an free-market billion dollar industry based on it. Companies (amoral things designed to make money) will jump in to promote this new drug to the population, just like they do cigarettes, and alcohol.

Quote:
I don't think you can use "logic" and "law against legalization" in the same sentence. Making marijuana "illegal" (making the decision for people) is illogical to begin with. The removes freewill, removes choice, and ultimately makes us conform via force and not choice. Thats just my view.


Actually many laws prevent free choice. Polygomy is not allowed. Sex is restricted depending on age. You can't get prescription medication over the counter. You can't buy an artillery piece from Wal-Mart. Heck, you can't open a sidewalk shop in a day like you can in Hong Kong.

Essentially the idea against legalizing marijuana goes something like this: Marijuanna is a bad mind altering drug. However, the other drugs that people would start jumping to if it was legalized are potentially even worse. We don't want this. So we will keep marijuanna illegal, but keep the fines much lighter for casual users then for sellers. This way we will prevent what is happening in the Netherlands with stoned youth increasingly causing a ruckus on the streets.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

15 Mar 2007, 9:43 pm

jimservo wrote:
stoned youth increasingly causing a ruckus on the streets.



hahahahahahahahahahahaha. cause stoned people really cause ruckuses..yeah...sure.



i really don't mean to be a jerk...but you come off as extremely naive about drugs.


marijuana causes minor damage to the short term memory if you smoke large amounts of a very prolonged period of time. alcohol has even worse effects with that regard....you don't see people getting stupid drunk every night likewise, people would not all be going crazy getting stoned every night.

free-market billion dollar industry.....i dunno about you but that sounds pretty damned good to me. you'd also see an increase in international tourism. i see economic boom and an increase in available jobs for people....i see no economic downside to this...not to mention the specialty bars or coffee houses that could be opened especially for the purpose of smoking or otherwise consuming marijuana. and there are already taxes on marijuana...i think it's $3/gram, if i'm not mistaken.


as far as people jumping to other drugs....i just don't see that happening. people who use drugs will use them no matter if pot is legalized or not....you don't see people going from alcohol to pain pills or opiates. the gateway argument doesn't work and it most certainly doesn't apply to legalization...if anything, it puts forward the message "this is okay, these others aren't" which is the way it should be...not "this is okay but we say it isn't so you can't trust us about what else we say isn't okay" where you're pushing the idea that the government lies to you about drugs and you can't trust them on what's okay or not okay to use.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

15 Mar 2007, 9:48 pm

actually marijuana tax is 3.50/gram for every gram if owner possesses more than a certain amount...the normal ammoung listed is 40 or so grams.



pretty interesting huh? all of the states that have tax stamp acts are still on the books...they keep 'em so people in possession can be charged with tax evasion as well as possession.



Cyanide
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,003
Location: The Pacific Northwest

15 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
No matter what you or her think, marijuana doesn't "stop" people from dying.


no....nothing stops people from dying...we all die eventually. marijuana can make the quality of life better for some sick people and improving quality of life does make you live longer...that's a fact.


Well see? She doesn't NEED it to stay alive. It's not like cutting off oxygen.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

15 Mar 2007, 11:49 pm

Cyanide wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
No matter what you or her think, marijuana doesn't "stop" people from dying.


no....nothing stops people from dying...we all die eventually. marijuana can make the quality of life better for some sick people and improving quality of life does make you live longer...that's a fact.


Well see? She doesn't NEED it to stay alive. It's not like cutting off oxygen.



people don't NEED pain medication in their final hours either. it's to provide comfort for the dying.

unless you're okay with pain medication that kills your liver and can lead to serious physical addiction in combination with marinol in place of just simply ingesting marijuana.



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

16 Mar 2007, 11:42 am

Quote:
Marijuana, like alcohol, causes brain damage. I think the mass regular usage of something (else) that causes brain damage would be bad for the population of the United States.


I'm sorry, scientist havent been able to conclude this. In fact, they are finding it may help with Alzeheimers, you know, that disease that DOES destroy the brain. I didn't know they had concluded 'brain' damage as fact. Here I am, researching it all the time and I missed it. :)

Don't list one persons research as fact when anothers disputes it - Again, I've drawn the conclusion that the drug is what you make it. Anyone who smokes a ton of it will get whats coming for them but thats just simply karma at play.

Quote:
Marijuanna use will become more common should it become legalized.


I won't argue is use going up, I think it will - in fact, its a sure bet it will - you're finally letting people "live." Are you more concerned with 'people smoking and damaging themselves' or 'causing harm after they have smoked?' If its the latter, then you said prohibition increases crime which is the area we will focus - thats bad. If is "concern for people's health" then I simply suggest one keeps their eyes on their own plate as no one is flawless. Too many people trying to control too many people - yet, very few can control themselves.

Quote:
Essentially the idea against legalizing marijuana goes something like this: Marijuanna is a bad mind altering drug. However, the other drugs that people would start jumping to if it was legalized are potentially even worse. We don't want this. So we will keep marijuanna illegal, but keep the fines much lighter for casual users then for sellers. This way we will prevent what is happening in the Netherlands with stoned youth increasingly causing a ruckus on the streets.


I think thats flawed (regardless of thats the way it is or not). Alcohol is a mind altering drug. Caffeine is a mind altering drug. Marijuana is a drug which I think is picked FOR a reason. Hell, anti-depressant ARE a mind altering drug. People want to pin marijuana has the most evil thing when people have at least 3 other choices they can flock to. Now that "legal" drugs are being abused, its obvious that "banning" or "Regulating" stuff isn't helping. The thing is, you cannot "control" another person, no matter how much faith you have in socialism or banning or whatever - it simply doesnt work. I think it must be accepted unless you (generally speaking) like being bossed around



psych
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,488
Location: w london

16 Mar 2007, 11:54 am

jimservo wrote:
Marijuana, like alcohol, causes brain damage. I think the mass regular usage of something (else) that causes brain damage would be bad for the population of the United States.


source?

My understanding is recent studies point to cannabis having a neuro-generative effect, whilst the most infamous 'brain damage' study was discredited as it basically consisted of forcing rhebus monkeys to smoke so much they would have sustained permanent damage anyway from oxygen starvation.

Quote:
This way we will prevent what is happening in the Netherlands with stoned youth increasingly causing a ruckus on the streets.


If that is true, (which i doubt - cocaine/alcohol are far better associated with a 'ruckus') then id expect most of those youth to be drug-tourists, so its not a fair argument.

One positive aspect of Netherlands drug culture is the fact that, since cannabis decriminalization, the average age of heroin addicts has risen. This suggests a broken link in the black market 'gateway'.



Last edited by psych on 16 Mar 2007, 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

psych
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,488
Location: w london

16 Mar 2007, 11:59 am

Cyanide wrote:
No matter what you or her think, marijuana doesn't "stop" people from dying.


Recent research (and old research discovered, then hidden years ago by the USA) strongly points to an anti-tumor effect. It can also stop potentially fatal convulsions in people with severe epilepsy.



Pug
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 332
Location: Stardusk

16 Mar 2007, 1:35 pm

jimservo wrote:
This way we will prevent what is happening in the Netherlands with stoned youth increasingly causing a ruckus on the streets.

jimservo, isn't it time to get right sources for your information? In Holland we don't have such problems. In case there are problems, it's always near the coffeeshops and reaches the newspapers, showing it's rare news.

I know christian america wants you to believe otherwise. Some dutch christians even oppose coffeeshops, I think that's a true christian thing. However, like the american, a lot of dutch christians live right there, where no coffeeshops are, and they are, like you americans, prejudiced. The fact is, people in the city, so, living closer to coffeeshops and truly knowing what their impact is (ie not a big impact), are much more tolerant, and don't want to illegalize drugs.

And that's not only true for the non-christian citizens. Also chistians living in the cities are often pro-coffeeshops, even some christian mayors support coffeechops. They know what the coffeeshops mean, know their importance, know their dangers.

Don't let you be led by your christianity or your american sources, come travel to holland, have a joint in one of our nice coffeeshops and see we have no problems!



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

16 Mar 2007, 2:51 pm

Pug wrote:
jimservo wrote:
This way we will prevent what is happening in the Netherlands with stoned youth increasingly causing a ruckus on the streets.

jimservo, isn't it time to get right sources for your information? In Holland we don't have such problems. In case there are problems, it's always near the coffeeshops and reaches the newspapers, showing it's rare news.

I know christian america wants you to believe otherwise. Some dutch christians even oppose coffeeshops, I think that's a true christian thing. However, like the american, a lot of dutch christians live right there, where no coffeeshops are, and they are, like you americans, prejudiced. The fact is, people in the city, so, living closer to coffeeshops and truly knowing what their impact is (ie not a big impact), are much more tolerant, and don't want to illegalize drugs.

And that's not only true for the non-christian citizens. Also chistians living in the cities are often pro-coffeeshops, even some christian mayors support coffeechops. They know what the coffeeshops mean, know their importance, know their dangers.

Don't let you be led by your christianity or your american sources, come travel to holland, have a joint in one of our nice coffeeshops and see we have no problems!


would i be right to guess that the bars that serve alcohol are much more dangerous and cause many more problems than the coffeehouses? i mean it's just something i'd guess from my personal experience split between drinking and smoking (the life of a rock star...such a hard life)



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

16 Mar 2007, 3:45 pm

Hey Pug, out of curiousity, how many police cars appear outside these coffeeshops?

I only ask because back home, in London, Ontario, there were 600 bars. The most popular are located on the main street in the downtown area. If you would like to witness where half the police force spends their friday and saturday nights, its on this street picking up drunk ret*ds and tossing them into the back of wagons, cruisers, etc. Sometimes, even the full force squads were out (in riot gear).

When you smoke pot, I think it is very rare that your biggest interest, at the time, is pounding the s**t out of someone else and starting violent acts.

I dont have much experience with people smoking pot and get severely hyper and ret*d (doing stupid things to others) after getting "too high." In fact, I've known many people who will never "drink a lot" again, but very few will say "man, I smoked so much weed last night, never again." It just doesnt have that impact alcohol does.

I DO know people who get hyper but they just become severely annoying. Anyways, any aspie would want to punch out some overly excited person who won't shut up or stop dancing around you and causing eye 'sores' by craving attention. cough, personal experience... Either way, I've been really high and really drunk and all I can say is that drunk is far worse and its legal.

And on top of that, I last read about DUI's that Marijuana accounts for 10% of accidents where the driver is intoxicated. 90% of the "10%" had "alcohol" in their system, as well. I'll never be able to dig that up so take it for what it is, hear say



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

16 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm

Corvus wrote:
Hey Pug, out of curiousity, how many police cars appear outside these coffeeshops?

I only ask because back home, in London, Ontario, there were 600 bars. The most popular are located on the main street in the downtown area. If you would like to witness where half the police force spends their friday and saturday nights, its on this street picking up drunk ret*ds and tossing them into the back of wagons, cruisers, etc. Sometimes, even the full force squads were out (in riot gear).

When you smoke pot, I think it is very rare that your biggest interest, at the time, is pounding the s**t out of someone else and starting violent acts.

I dont have much experience with people smoking pot and get severely hyper and ret*d (doing stupid things to others) after getting "too high." In fact, I've known many people who will never "drink a lot" again, but very few will say "man, I smoked so much weed last night, never again." It just doesnt have that impact alcohol does.

I DO know people who get hyper but they just become severely annoying. Anyways, any aspie would want to punch out some overly excited person who won't shut up or stop dancing around you and causing eye 'sores' by craving attention. cough, personal experience... Either way, I've been really high and really drunk and all I can say is that drunk is far worse and its legal.

And on top of that, I last read about DUI's that Marijuana accounts for 10% of accidents where the driver is intoxicated. 90% of the "10%" had "alcohol" in their system, as well. I'll never be able to dig that up so take it for what it is, hear say



not to mention there's no way to really judge if the person was intoxicated with marijuana at the time or if it was simply present in their blood system from previously smoking it.



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

16 Mar 2007, 4:16 pm

ya Ska, I heard in some states they want to make it so you can be charged days after you smoked (if caught in an accident). They probably rationalized that its too hard to tell when it WAS you smoked so why not just go all the way?

I'm just shocked at how bad people think pot is. Its never killed anyone (so it should make you stronger :)) (thats a joke)



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

16 Mar 2007, 4:30 pm

it's a lot easier to die from alcohol abuse and alcohol related deaths(like drunk driving) than it is to die from pot.


reuters article from october 2005 wrote:
NEW YORK (Reuters) — Although both marijuana and tobacco smoke are packed with cancer-causing chemicals, other qualities of marijuana seem to keep it from promoting lung cancer, according to a new report.
The difference rests in the often opposing actions of the nicotine in tobacco and the active ingredient, THC, in marijuana, says Dr. Robert Melamede of the University of Colorado in Colorado Springs.

He reviewed the scientific evidence supporting this contention in a recent issue of Harm Reduction Journal.

Whereas nicotine has several effects that promote lung and other types of cancer, THC acts in ways that counter the cancer-causing chemicals in marijuana smoke, Melamede explained in an interview with Reuters Health.

"THC turns down the carcinogenic potential," he said.

For example, lab research indicates that nicotine activates a body enzyme that converts certain chemicals in both tobacco and marijuana smoke into cancer-promoting form. In contrast, studies in mice suggest that THC blocks this enzyme activity.

Another key difference, Melamede said, is in the immune system effects of tobacco and marijuana. Smoke sends irritants into the respiratory system that trigger an immune-regulated inflammatory response, which involves the generation of potentially cell-damaging substances called free radicals. These particles are believed to contribute to a range of diseases, including cancer.

But cannabinoids -- both those found in marijuana and the versions found naturally in the body -- have been shown to dial down this inflammatory response, Melamede explained.

Another difference between tobacco and marijuana smoking, he said, has to do with cells that line the respiratory tract. While these cells have receptors that act as docks for nicotine, similar receptors for THC and other cannabinoids have not been found.

Nicotine, Melamede said, appears to keep these cells from committing "suicide" when they are genetically damaged, by smoking, for instance. When such cells do not kill themselves off, they are free to progress into tumors.

THC, however, does not appear to act this way in the respiratory tract -- though, in the brain, where there are cannabinoid receptors, it may have the beneficial effect of protecting cells from death when they are damaged from an injury or stroke, according to Melamede.

All of this, he said, fits in with population studies that have failed to link marijuana smoking with a higher risk of lung cancer -- though there is evidence that pot users have more respiratory problems, such as chronic cough and frequent respiratory infections.

If marijuana does not promote lung cancer, that could factor into the ongoing debate over so-called medical marijuana. Melamede said he believes "marijuana has loads of medicinal value," for everything from multiple sclerosis, to the chronic pain of arthritis, to nausea caused by cancer treatment.

U.S. government officials, however, maintain that the evidence for medical marijuana is not there. Ten states allow people to use marijuana with a doctor's prescription, but the Supreme Court has ruled that federal law trumps state law.