Corvus wrote:
If you study life, then any form of government is going to go against a lot of life.
Governments try to help others but they dont help everyone. Those they do not help, they are prejudice. The only way to become unprejudice is to stop helping people or to help everyone. The latter option is impossible but its one that government TRIES to do. It tries because it STARTED helping people. Those it 'didnt' were left out, now, they aren't. The result is more services and charities everyone else has to pay into.
Oddly enough, I think we give the government a large chunk of our change and say 'here, think for us' while we do all the petty work. It should be the other way around. We should be doing the thinking for ourselves. I dont know why people love having others do their thinking but maybe its because people have tough times alone with themselves (no so much the people here).
Anarchist society is that of utopia - no one controlling your actions except your responsible view on life.. its truely as simple as "if it effects someone else, dont do it, but trash yourself all you want" but somehow it turned into the world we know today
Speak for yourself. Since when have the electorate been absolved of the responsibility to think for themselves? If individuals choose to abdicate from their responsibilities, that is another matter. And a complete absence of services would not be a very desirable outcome, unless a sufficient number of citizens are willing to do their part to run what would formerly have been government controlled services. And surely the same people leaving thinking to elected legislators or executive administrations would be equally unwilling to act responsibly in an anarchist society, where nobody could oblige them to even contribute financially.
_________________
You are like children playing in the market-place saying, "We piped for you and you would not dance, we wailed a dirge for you and you would not weep."