Page 2 of 2 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Aspie_Chav
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2006
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,931
Location: Croydon

21 Mar 2007, 4:47 pm

psych wrote:
You need to control for confounding variables and reverse causality before making conclusions.

*this is called the 'spot reduction myth' in personal training - the idea that doing (for instance) situps will magically burn fat deposits from around the stomach.


Of course, I have not come to the conclusion yet but exploring an previously unexplored avenue .

Spot reduction is mostly a myth, that is why I thought to myself if load of guys with beer bellies are consuming beer, it isn't the beer that is giving them that body shape, other then the extra weight they might put on.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

21 Mar 2007, 5:01 pm

What does this have to do with politics, philosophy and religion? Or am I afraid to ask.



Aspie_Chav
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2006
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,931
Location: Croydon

21 Mar 2007, 5:56 pm

calandale wrote:
What does this have to do with politics, philosophy and religion? Or am I afraid to ask.


The ability to analyze correctly is a philosophy.

Finding an answer to British binge drinking culture is politics.