9 year old sex slave raped by 10 ISIS militants.

Post Reply New Topic

Although I see most religions like Christianity *old testement* and Judism the same way and troll religions as such which deny evolution and modern scientific methods I actually agree with you on this one. If god is real *regardless you saying he is with no proof* if he is and such a lovely god he would not agree to rape or molesting kids and such or murdering people simply because they do not believe.

Pretentiously sanctimonious as usual.

If "survival of the fittest" is the ultimate morality then you have no case against paedophiles or any other perversion.

Every time you offer an opinion you condemn yourself. You'd best confine your absurd opinions to your own imagination. The thinking atheist does not exist... it is a self-contradiction.

As stated by the rules of PPR:



viewtopic.php?t=204613

So please treat people with respect.

It's amusing that : The thinking atheist does not exist... it is a self-contradiction. caught your attention.

I am quite happy to repeat that the "thinking atheist" is a self-contradictory nonsense.

Muhammadanism is a perversion of a plagiarism of Judaism and Christianity.

For once I agreed with you and you pull this crap? Dude I agreed with you for once but I suppose I can lump creationists like you with ISIS your all insane and unable of grasping at any logic or capacity to learn anything scientific or logic. Remember in the Old testiment in the bible Incest and rape was ok same with murdering children I don't agree with that crap neither do I agree with the assbackwards thinking that the Earth is only 10000 years old and people were made out of dirt and ribs when modern science has provided mountains of evidence proving otherwise and this makes young Earth creationist bible thumpers like your self wrong time and time again.

So where do you get your sanctimonious "morality" from?

The "survival-of-the-fittest" paradigm contains no morality clause other than survival and dominance.

A bit of "spring cleaning" to rid the house of cockroaches and other vermin makes sense to a theist. Particularly since every cockroach will be rewarded according to their merits.

According to you lot morality is only an opinion of some convenience to whoever holds the biggest stick. Eugenics is the only conclusion to your "morality". The Islamists are simply practicing that according to their convenience and ambition.

It is also stupidly self-contradictory to blame the perversity of a designedly autonomous creature on the designer. You demand autonomy and you got it. Your choices will be appropriately rewarded.

Is that directed at me?

Never mind

I know nothing about you. Does the cap fit?

every major religion has the golden rule. it doesn't take a theist to see the benefits of the golden rule. i'm human. that hurts me. i won't do that to another human. incredibly simple moral logic that most five-year-olds understand.

How does the notion of survival of the fittest fit with the Christian call to love your neighbor?

It doesn't.

Why or why not? What do any "Golden Rules" have to do with survival or dominance?

Well, I thought the implication was that you were a believer, of the fundamentalist type.

I have no words. Those men are truly evil and deserve to go to jail for life. A nine-year-old sex slave? What a sick world. I hope at least the little girl will be okay.

You are not the first religious person to assume atheists use "survival of the fittest" as a basis for morality. It's a common misconception. But just because a religious person gets their morality from religious teachings it does not therefore mean that non-religious people look to evolution for morality.

You ask AspieOtaku where he gets his morality from and then assume it comes from "survival of the fittest" even though it obviously does not. His morality clearly has nothing to do with "survival of the fittest".

So where does it come from? It may come from a similar desire as mine, to live in a world where people treat each other with dignity and trying to minimize the suffering of living beings is a goal.

This is a decision. It's not a rule from God (although the mellower brand of religious people often do call it such). You don't have to be ordered by a deity in order to come to a decision.

It has nothing to do with evolution. I have actually never come across a non-religious person using survival of the fittest as a morality paradigm. A large number of movies have villians who use it as a morality paradigm. But equating atheists with movie villains nis absurd.

Religious morality is just as much a human decision as non-religious morality. But it gets marketed as 'word of God'. Even so, it clearly changes over time. I find many things in the Bible to be morally horrifying (Lot offering up his duaghters as potential rape victims??? How is that moral???) If you scour the internet you wil probably find an atheist who uses survival of the fittest as a moral paradigm. But that aint me or Aspie Otaku or probably any non-religious person on this board. Isis seems to fit a veryu ancient moral paradigm that saw women as objects to use and children as mini-adults. I find that horribly immoral. My decision to see that as immoral has literally nothing to do with evolution.