'Wednesday Hillary Clinton is done" Assange to speak Tuesday

Post Reply New Topic

It's obvious Trump has a big ego and who can blame the guy? It is a good point that he's a pretty open book about things compared Hillary who's public persona couldn't be any more fake and I think you'd be mistaken to think she lacks an ego and is this weird grandma character she is trying to play now. I think Trump wants to wants to help the American people but I think he is probably motivated in part by his own ambitions for 'greatness' and desire for love & adoration, he may not be the most altruistic or selfless person but I think this ego will lend itself to him dedicating himself to to his job to best of his abilities. Is Trump an opportunist? I think he's been consistent with his core message for a long long time and if you go watch that clip of him on Oprah from the 80s where she asks him if he'll ever run for president it will sound very familiar, he raises the same points about being ripped off in trade and our allies not paying their fair share. Trump said back then that he'd probably never run but maybe he would if the country got bad enough and felt it needed him, I guess it's finally got bad enough so I guess in that way you can say he's an opportunist.

Trump has never really been accepted the Manhattan high society and now pretty much all the forces of Lucifer... I mean Wall Street and the Beltway establishment, have united along with our corporate media against him. This also gives him credence since he has all the right enemies, they way they have acted like chickens with their heads cut off really makes him seem like the real deal. The wealthy in this country do not like to advertise their wealth and Trump has always flied in the face of that, he's always been gaudy and blinged out. I find him, and I think a lot of people in this country do, to be a quintessentially American character and someone people aspire to be. He is a shrewd businessman which I don't see as a negative, being upset with him for taking advantages of the loop holes(some actually created by Bill when he was president) granted to him and using his money to buy influence is just what you do in business and you need somebody that understands it from the inside like that.

Trump ran a business, he's lost billions and made it all back multiple times over and I don't think his failed businesses are a mark against because he tried and he employed doing it along the way. This idea that he was bequeathed his wealth from his father and that he is an incompetent business man couldn't be further from the truth. He's a leader and he wasn't afraid to take risks and try new things, it's not his fault that Atlantic City went bust which happened because of the legalization of Indian casinos on the east coast so gambling was no longer a novelty and Atlantic City is a resort town that has busted before. There is nothing anybody on earth could of done to save Atlantic City, the forces were beyond Trump's control. One thing to keep in mind that Trump didn't make his fortune by being a money manipulator, he built/ran hotels and golf resorts while employing tens of thousands of people over the years so it's a tangible thing unlike say Mitt Romney who made his money outsourcing jobs and liquefying companies.

As for Trump's tax and environmental policies, what either of the candidates have as their platform isn't what they're actually going to get since they're just ideas at this point and need the approval of the congress. Trump is a negotiator and you don't start with what you actually want but rather negotiate down to it if possible, I feel like he is already negotiating and cultivating an image of strength to assist with that. Trump fancies himself a grand deal maker and pragmatist but he's not a push over either, he's actually credible and not someone that will surrender to the Democrats or Republican establishment as almost all have before him. Mitt Romney seems like a nice guy but he was a liberal Republican governor and never inspired anybody, John McCain is a neoconservative ideologue and someone that has derided and looked down his nose at the GOP establishment his whole career. Everyone had great hopes for Obama but he didn't live up the promises of his campaign, a lot of people call him a push over and he entered office with super majorities in the House and Senate which were majorities that were suppose to last a generation but were wiped out entirely in 4-6 years. The Democrats were so anti-war and pro-constitution while Bush was in office but the second he was elected they flipped the switch and were now pro-war and anti-constitution.

Trump is opportunity to enact real change to and to overthrow our political establishment, this opportunity won't come again for a long time and if Trump fails then the two parties will make changes to make sure no outsider candidate like that could ever challenge the status quo like that again. People don't even have to agree with Trump on a lot of things if their interest is in overthrowing this order, if Trump can win then so can a candidate like a Bernie Sanders instead of the cookie cutter corporate candidate that are really almost indistinguishable from each other. Could you imagine if Jeb Bush was the GOP nominee? It would be like 2012 all over again, there would be no real choice while the powers that be have their bets hedged either way. The elitism and political correctness that has stifled our political process for far too long needs to end!

To be honest, what put it over the top for me was when Trump spoke having peace with Russia and I'm sure some people are starting to think I'm some sort of Russophile or that I'm in love Putin but I never bought the propaganda against him and he is an effective leader for his people which admirable considering where Russia was before he took office. Untangling our web of alliances is something that is central to Trump's campaign and forging a new relationship with Russia which to me is the most important bilateral relationship in the world, the truth is we have a lot in common and have a lot of shared interests. I have no appetite from confrontation with Russia, I think they'd be a better ally than say Saudi Arabia who controls our foreign policy who's human rights record is infinitely worse. No other candidate advocated for this, earlier in the campaign these freaks were calling for a no fly zone in Syria which would mean an air war with Russia over Syria which we might lose believe it or not.

I doubt anything will come of this. Unfotunately, it's a win-win. Even if Assange has nothing on Hillary, all he has to do is say he does. Then when he doesn't come out with any actual information, the conspiracy theorists will simply conclude that he was threatened into silence. I don't believe Assange has anything but we will find out soon enough.

I think this is just an example of the big lie technnique. You repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth. I just don't believe that Clinton has murdered anyone and covered it up. Even if she did how would anyone even know? How do you even know you are reading accurate information? I've seen people accuse her of 40+ murders. It just suspends disbelief. One or two is possible but I still don't see that the evidence points to it.

I just don't see Hillary as an evil psychopath. It would take a psychopath to do what she has been accused of doing (covering up murders). I could be wrong of course.

Assange could reveal footage of Hillary shape shifting into a giant lizard and her supporters would still stick their head in the sand like they have over her supporting terrorsts in Libya, Syria, and being funded by Saudi Arabia, the same guys who did 9/11.

I see it as a means of making it fair, I don't think American workers should have to compete with the slaves and serfs of the world. The number would be one that makes up that difference. The US is lucky in that it has great potential for self sufficiency, we have huge country with abundant natural resources and are an ocean away from the most troubled parts of the world. If we can't get a better deal then we should start charging the countries that live under our protectorate more as they do not contribute their fair share and that tribute should go to the US directly for its service to them. We have too much foreign aid while not collecting the rents from our deadbeat allies so something has to change. I like the idea of getting rid of the income tax entirely and returning to funding our government thru tariffs and excise taxes as it was for its first 150 years, if there was internally no income tax then I think it would give a boost to our domestic economy and put a halt to outsourcing. The numbers have to hashed out but that's the direction I'd like to go. If America is not working for me then quite frankly I don't care if it stops working for the billionaires/multinational corporations or do we now believe in trickle down economics?

Language warning --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdySeAEPKBM
(I don't know whether it was ever formally prosecuted, but, in Britain, it was supposed to be illegal to watch. According to BRICS-aligned interests, the beheading videos were faked, and planted on people.)

Server-gate was used as a ruse, to lure Russia into war. And, when you watch that montage of bureaucrats and dignitaries, threatening Assange, in this endless press release, what is the narrative. Cyber-warfare is war. They say it, repeatedly; it's terrorism, to them.

But, what kind of info is actually leaked. Nothing of strategic value. (That's called a "limited hangout," to give disinfo, under interrogation.) We heard about the lacking, social graces of foreign dignitaries, and the guy with his finger on the button. Can you create a strategy or a system, with this sort of information. Can it be used to endanger people. Or, is it just feelings.

If anything, the scandal is our poor reputation as a military state. When this comes into question, she picks fights with foreign countries.

She's not stupid, but a clever liar, adept at emotionalizing the issue.