friedmacguffins wrote:
I'm not Catholic but don't see why gay people require the formal acknowledgment of innocent bystanders, when they are able to have independent venues. I understood that it has always had a place, in society, since times immemorial.
There's what's called sound doctrine, and there's Churchianity. Some looks and mannerisms are not traditions of men, irrespective of our beliefs. It's just not customary, and the provocateurs knew that.
starkid wrote:
Despite the fact that your whole comment is tangential (if not irrelevant) to this thread...
What looks and mannerisms have to do with the topic, I've no idea.
Think about all the superstitions, which different people had, throughout the ages, and you will know how to poke each one's emotional buttons. You could be the best provocateur of all times.
You know, I've never read one verse, which talks about someone with red horns, a pitchfork, and pointy tail. Should you dress this way, and demand equal time, at the pulpit?
Aren't there places, where you can dress however you want?
I think that nominal, secular, progressives have a problem with free will. You are not so heroic, to pick a fight, when everyone can go their own way. They will go their own way, and remember you as instigators, if at all.