I'll admit, while I like listening to Sargon, Computing Forever, Sam Harris, Gad Saad, Jordan Peterson, Jonathan Haidt, etc.. I find that Black Pigeon and Reality Calls Show get a little far out on some topics to where fire gets played with and I'm not 100% sure where they're going.
This might be that my first encounter with Black Pigeon was a video stating that liberated women want strong and dominant men, to the point of those willing to re-oppress them and forcibly roll their freedoms back, that they loath freedom and cultured men and that the embrace of Islam coming in to the west in increasing amounts and getting completely ignored comes from this desire by these women to be dominated. I can't argue that there aren't women out there like this, what you do have to look at carefully is the quantities of cause and effect. The postmodernists and intersectionalists have put a gag order on criticizing anyone who doesn't look quite like you do. Even when they do look like you, case in point Ayaan Hirsi Ali, or even in a more strange case - look like you and practice the same religion that you still practice, ie. Maajid Nawaz, that you can end up on Southern Poverty Law Center's list of extremists. You have a whole end of the political spectrum who takes the military-industrial complex and anything that looks like nationalism much more seriously as an enemy than they do the international bad actors in certain shell states or even the trade, currency, and debt wars between various countries.
As far as the Reality Calls Show I liked Tara's interview with Jordan Peterson, there have been a few other topics that turned out well, but things get weird on the topic of eugenics. What really through me for a loop was that the very next interview I saw was with Jared Taylor. She has a lot of racial realism (ie. scienctific racism) proponents on the show. Jared kept citing IQ as likely to be very different, and I made myself listen to as much of the interview as I could because for one it took a while to believe that I was actually hearing what I was, and for the rest of the time I wanted to figure out which facts were actually being cited. It seemed to boil down to anecdote, IQ by geography, and things that really tell a misleading story. I've heard the figure put out in other places that race itself is only an indicator of 15% of active human traits and that it's far more minor than other things. Similarly my best guess, if I going to take a shot at this, if there are racial differences in crime rates I think that's more endocrine-related than anything else. The only utility of racial realism, if its even remotely true, is to take it in the direction of the point that Alain De Botton often makes about meritocracies - ie. that beyond being unrealistic the concept is actively cruel and inhumane to those whose absolute best won't be good enough (IMHO that could apply to low intelligence whites, blacks, anyone) and when you get there still race itself seems like it would matter less than intelligence and functionality, of which there are so many things that can cause said variances.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.