Page 2 of 6 [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

02 Apr 2017, 9:44 am

JoeNavy wrote:
Willfully gratifying yourself...to the detriment of other people or living things...is what qualifies as evil or sinful.

I believe we can leave out the parts about "with unnecessary wants...and the rules set forth by your personal deity (if you believe in such)". Ants and bees and such all run on pure instinct while willingly self-sacrificing for the sake of the colony where we humans have the personal freedom to choose to do so voluntarily and even without having ever been given religious instruction.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

02 Apr 2017, 9:47 am

LaetiBlabla wrote:
Seeing the world as a community where you contribute to global responsible welfare
is "live" and "build", versus "survive" and "destroy".
If everybody lives and build, you must build and live to survive.
You are rejected if you destroy.
Humans may one day reach this level of consciousness that would help them respond together to life's challenges...

Exactly!


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

16 Apr 2017, 9:44 am

Dutch87 wrote:
[
Quote:
quote="GnosticBishop"]
Windigo wrote:
I agree with the OP.

If God wanted us to understand what evil is, we must be able to know what good is and vice versa. We must be able to sin in order to refrain from it. So the knowledge of good and evil is a necessary thing in the understanding of the meaning of life.

Without it we would have remained in a state of (ignorant) bliss as we were in the garden of evil. Like a child, we were ignorant of the evil of the world but also unable to grow and learn until we experienced pain and learned what ''bad'' means.

So ultimately, God created a perfect imperfect world. To appreciate perfection, we must know imperfection. This knowledge frees the mind.


Thanks.

Intelligent as compared to Yo El who thinks A & E should have stayed as bright as bricks and too stupid to even reproduce.

Christians will not acknowledge that Genesis and Eden are Jewish myths that they interpret to be our elevation and not our fall.

Christians think it a fall for humans to develop a moral sense. That is why they can follow a genocidal son murdering God.

Regards
DL

Lots of generalisations here. I consider myself a Christian and I acknowledge both the Jewish origin of Genesis and its allegorical nature. I also agree that eating the forbidden fruit is equal to acquiring moral reason. Whether that is a good thing is open for debate.


Open for debate, where?

Quote:
The reason why eating of the fruit may be considered as the fall of humanity is because the ability to know about evil also appears to generate the ability to perpetrate evil. This can be evidenced by two things: the evil that humans do to other lifeforms and the planet at large and the evil that humans do to each other.


It was not considered a fall by intelligent people who know the value of a moral sense.
Quote:

Moral reasoning is one of the ways that set humans apart from other animals, but is that a good thing?


Yes. This is common knowledge.

Quote:
It has enabled us to build complex civilisations and to make great technological advances, but we are currently destroying the planet to the point that life may become unsustainable. We have also contributed greatly to the extinction of many other species and their habitats. Now we are even contributing to our own extinction. Even though God, according to the Bible, has a special place in His heart for humanity, He is also the Creator of other lifeforms. From the perspective of these lifeforms (and God's I think) we are clearly a parasitic species.


Fear not. We cannot hurt this planet in any permanent way. Mankind may be a different story.

Quote:
And what about the way we treat each other? We have seen great wars, and the capacity for human greed is large. The acquisition of reason makes us ambitious and hardworking, but it also seems we are never satisfied. We always want more. This preoccupation with ourselves and wanting more may be a consequence of our pride. Pride is the price we pay for the acquistion of moral reasoning. And pride does seem to come before the fall (even our own extinction?).


Our selfish gene is what has made us what we are. Without it we would have gone extinct.

Quote:
Undoubtedly this perspective is but one way to look at it. But after all this can you blame God for thinking that ignorance is bliss? Rousseau for thinking that human morality at its best has humans living as noble
savages? Are we and the world so much better off because humans are (or think of themselves as) special?[/quote]

Yes. If we did not think as we do, we would likely not be and would have gone extinct.

You seem to want to bite the hand that feeds you.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

16 Apr 2017, 9:49 am

leejosepho wrote:
[
Quote:
quote="GnosticBishop"]Is doing evil a necessity of life?

No, it is not.


Yet you offer no argument to show how we can survive and thrive without competition.

Quote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Consider. Evolution has two major components that we must do to survive; compete or cooperate... Competition would be seen as evil as it creates a victim and loser.

Correct: It is never okay to do something at the expense of another.


Yet you knowingly do every time you compete for a job.

GnosticBishop wrote:
To not compete would produce the least fit and we would likely go extinct.

Are you suggesting we humans need to be actively destroying "the least fit" amongst us in order to cull the herd or whatever?[/quote]

No. They will go extinct on their own.

Is that not what nature does with other species?

Why do you think we should try to live against natural law?

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

16 Apr 2017, 9:55 am

JoeNavy wrote:
You can't do evil without the knowledge that it is evil. A fox is not evil when it raids a henhouse, regardless of feelings of the farmer. All living things kill or benefit from the death of another living thing. It is a natural process. Willfully gratifying yourself with unnecessary wants to the detriment of other people or living things and the rules set forth by your personal deity (if you believe in such) is what qualifies as evil or sinful.


Sounds like you are talking of all lying priests, preachers and imams.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

16 Apr 2017, 9:58 am

LaetiBlabla wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Is doing evil a necessity of life?

Consider. Evolution has two major components that we must do to survive; compete or cooperate, as required. Cooperation we would see as good because it does not create a victim or loser. Competition would be seen as evil as it creates a victim and loser.

From this view, we must do evil and to survive as that process produces the fittest. To not compete would produce the least fit and we would likely go extinct.


Competition makes the evilest win, the one who "kills" the other.
If everybody competes, you must compete to survive.
Then the ones who survive are the evilest.
Evil is always destructive.
Humans have done the necessary to survive but our planet is nearly destroyed.

Seeing the world as a community where you contribute to global responsible welfare
is "live" and "build", versus "survive" and "destroy".
If everybody lives and build, you must build and live to survive.
You are rejected if you destroy.
Humans may one day reach this level of consciousness that would help them respond together to life's challenges,
instead of building 3 and destroying 2... not very efficient.


Having the fittest rise to the top is quite efficient when that is the inadvertent goal of survival.

To have the survival of the least fit while the most fit dies is not what nature had in mind.

Regards
DL



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

16 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm

GnosticBishop wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Is doing evil a necessity of life?

No, it is not.

Yet you offer no argument to show how we can survive and thrive without competition.

I was simply answering a question, and I have never known competition to be necessary for survival.

GnosticBishop wrote:
Consider. Evolution has two major components that we must do to survive; compete or cooperate... Competition would be seen as evil as it creates a victim and loser.
leejosepho wrote:
Correct: It is never okay to do something at the expense of another.

Yet you knowingly do every time you compete for a job.

Getting paid as agreed for a job completed is not the same as competition.

GnosticBishop wrote:
To not compete would produce the least fit and we would likely go extinct.
leejosepho wrote:
Are you suggesting we humans need to be actively destroying "the least fit" amongst us in order to cull the herd or whatever?

No. They will go extinct on their own...

Why do you think we should try to live against natural law?

Where have I suggested we should?


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

16 Apr 2017, 2:53 pm

leejosepho wrote:
[
Quote:
quote="GnosticBishop"]
leejosepho wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Is doing evil a necessity of life?

No, it is not.

Yet you offer no argument to show how we can survive and thrive without competition.

I was simply answering a question, and I have never known competition to be necessary for survival.


Really? Name any animal that does not and indicate if you have done what you say can be done.

Quote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Consider. Evolution has two major components that we must do to survive; compete or cooperate... Competition would be seen as evil as it creates a victim and loser.
leejosepho wrote:
Correct: It is never okay to do something at the expense of another.

Yet you knowingly do every time you compete for a job.

Getting paid as agreed for a job completed is not the same as competition.


True, but you got paid because you won a competition against others for the job.

Quote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
To not compete would produce the least fit and we would likely go extinct.
leejosepho wrote:
Are you suggesting we humans need to be actively destroying "the least fit" amongst us in order to cull the herd or whatever?

No. They will go extinct on their own...

Why do you think we should try to live against natural law?

Where have I suggested we should?
[/quote]

By saying you can do without a natural staple. Competition.

Regards
DL



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

16 Apr 2017, 3:10 pm

GnosticBishop wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
I have never known competition to be necessary for survival.

Really? Name any animal that does not [compete] and indicate if you have done what you say can be done.

I thought we were talking about humans, and I have never needed to "take" at the expense of another human being in order to survive.

GnosticBishop wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Getting paid as agreed for a job completed is not the same as competition.

True, but...

Either that is true or it is not, and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do anyway -- is not the same as the kind of "competition" we are talking about.

GnosticBishop wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Where have I suggested we should [try to live against natural law]?

By saying you can do without a natural staple. Competition.

Competition resulting in some people sitting at the banquet table while others starve is not required for human survival.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

16 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm

leejosepho wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
I have never known competition to be necessary for survival.

Really? Name any animal that does not [compete] and indicate if you have done what you say can be done.

I thought we were talking about humans, and I have never needed to "take" at the expense of another human being in order to survive.

GnosticBishop wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Getting paid as agreed for a job completed is not the same as competition.

True, but...

Either that is true or it is not, and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do anyway -- is not the same as the kind of "competition" we are talking about.

GnosticBishop wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Where have I suggested we should [try to live against natural law]?

By saying you can do without a natural staple. Competition.

Competition resulting in some people sitting at the banquet table while others starve is not required for human survival.


True. But we do not care for the victim we create as we are forced to compete.

"and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do"

Are you saying you have never competed for a job?

Regards
DL



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

16 Apr 2017, 7:06 pm

GnosticBishop wrote:
...we do not care for the victim...as we are forced to compete.

I do not recall ever being forced to compete.

GnosticBishop wrote:
"and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do"

Are you saying you have never competed for a job?

Not that I can recall. I did once "compete" for the attention of a woman, but only once and that did not turn out any better for her or myself than for the suitor who "lost".


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

17 Apr 2017, 9:04 am

leejosepho wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
...we do not care for the victim...as we are forced to compete.

I do not recall ever being forced to compete.

GnosticBishop wrote:
"and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do"

Are you saying you have never competed for a job?

Not that I can recall. I did once "compete" for the attention of a woman, but only once and that did not turn out any better for her or myself than for the suitor who "lost".


Women are a recourse and men compete for resources.

Nice that jobs were just given to you without competition but I am sure that in school you competed for the best marks which likely is the competition you did to get that job offered to you without a direct competition for it.

Work with me pall. This is not rocket science.

Regards
DL



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

17 Apr 2017, 9:31 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
Women are a recourse and men compete for resources.

I do not consider women a resource, and willfully competing against another male while seeking a mate was one of the worst things I ever did in life.

GnosticBishop wrote:
I am sure that in school you competed for the best marks...

No, and I once actually failed a forced competition intentionally so the other class could win the picnic trip.

GnosticBishop wrote:
Work with me pall. This is not rocket science.

Certainly not, and that is why I can easily see through your agenda even if I might not be able to precisely define it.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

17 Apr 2017, 10:39 am

leejosepho wrote:
[
Quote:
quote="GnosticBishop"]Women are a recourse and men compete for resources.

I do not consider women a resource, and willfully competing against another male while seeking a mate was one of the worst things I ever did in life.


Sure beats an arranged loveless marriage.

Men are a resource to women and women are a resource to men, if we want to reproduce, --- and that is the first raison daître for our evolutionary drive.

Quote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
I am sure that in school you competed for the best marks...

No, and I once actually failed a forced competition intentionally so the other class could win the picnic trip.


Then you made a victim and did evil to the one who won as he did not earn the reward. If anything, you weakened his chances that might come later.

Quote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Work with me pall. This is not rocket science.

Certainly not, and that is why I can easily see through your agenda even if I might not be able to precisely define it.
[/quote]

I make no secret of my overall agenda.

Care to test your ability to read my agenda and also tell us why you do not like it?

That will tell me if I am reading your agenda correctly?

Regards
DL



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

17 Apr 2017, 11:52 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
Care to test your ability to read my agenda and also tell us why you do not like it?

I can read just fine, I do not have any agenda other than to de-bunk agendas and Scripture teaches me to think and act far differently than the ways you seem to presume to justify by claiming we must do evil in order to survive.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

17 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm

leejosepho wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Care to test your ability to read my agenda and also tell us why you do not like it?

I can read just fine, I do not have any agenda other than to de-bunk agendas and Scripture teaches me to think and act far differently than the ways you seem to presume to justify by claiming we must do evil in order to survive.


Yet you offer no argument to refute what I put.

If you think we can forgo evil, then show how as no animal I know of does not compete as well as cooperate when required.

Regards
DL