Is doing evil a necessity of life?
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
I believe we can leave out the parts about "with unnecessary wants...and the rules set forth by your personal deity (if you believe in such)". Ants and bees and such all run on pure instinct while willingly self-sacrificing for the sake of the colony where we humans have the personal freedom to choose to do so voluntarily and even without having ever been given religious instruction.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
is "live" and "build", versus "survive" and "destroy".
If everybody lives and build, you must build and live to survive.
You are rejected if you destroy.
Humans may one day reach this level of consciousness that would help them respond together to life's challenges...
Exactly!
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
If God wanted us to understand what evil is, we must be able to know what good is and vice versa. We must be able to sin in order to refrain from it. So the knowledge of good and evil is a necessary thing in the understanding of the meaning of life.
Without it we would have remained in a state of (ignorant) bliss as we were in the garden of evil. Like a child, we were ignorant of the evil of the world but also unable to grow and learn until we experienced pain and learned what ''bad'' means.
So ultimately, God created a perfect imperfect world. To appreciate perfection, we must know imperfection. This knowledge frees the mind.
Thanks.
Intelligent as compared to Yo El who thinks A & E should have stayed as bright as bricks and too stupid to even reproduce.
Christians will not acknowledge that Genesis and Eden are Jewish myths that they interpret to be our elevation and not our fall.
Christians think it a fall for humans to develop a moral sense. That is why they can follow a genocidal son murdering God.
Regards
DL
Lots of generalisations here. I consider myself a Christian and I acknowledge both the Jewish origin of Genesis and its allegorical nature. I also agree that eating the forbidden fruit is equal to acquiring moral reason. Whether that is a good thing is open for debate.
Open for debate, where?
It was not considered a fall by intelligent people who know the value of a moral sense.
Moral reasoning is one of the ways that set humans apart from other animals, but is that a good thing?
Yes. This is common knowledge.
Fear not. We cannot hurt this planet in any permanent way. Mankind may be a different story.
Our selfish gene is what has made us what we are. Without it we would have gone extinct.
Yes. If we did not think as we do, we would likely not be and would have gone extinct.
You seem to want to bite the hand that feeds you.
Regards
DL
No, it is not.
Yet you offer no argument to show how we can survive and thrive without competition.
Correct: It is never okay to do something at the expense of another.
Yet you knowingly do every time you compete for a job.
Are you suggesting we humans need to be actively destroying "the least fit" amongst us in order to cull the herd or whatever?[/quote]
No. They will go extinct on their own.
Is that not what nature does with other species?
Why do you think we should try to live against natural law?
Regards
DL
Sounds like you are talking of all lying priests, preachers and imams.
Regards
DL
Consider. Evolution has two major components that we must do to survive; compete or cooperate, as required. Cooperation we would see as good because it does not create a victim or loser. Competition would be seen as evil as it creates a victim and loser.
From this view, we must do evil and to survive as that process produces the fittest. To not compete would produce the least fit and we would likely go extinct.
Competition makes the evilest win, the one who "kills" the other.
If everybody competes, you must compete to survive.
Then the ones who survive are the evilest.
Evil is always destructive.
Humans have done the necessary to survive but our planet is nearly destroyed.
Seeing the world as a community where you contribute to global responsible welfare
is "live" and "build", versus "survive" and "destroy".
If everybody lives and build, you must build and live to survive.
You are rejected if you destroy.
Humans may one day reach this level of consciousness that would help them respond together to life's challenges,
instead of building 3 and destroying 2... not very efficient.
Having the fittest rise to the top is quite efficient when that is the inadvertent goal of survival.
To have the survival of the least fit while the most fit dies is not what nature had in mind.
Regards
DL
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
No, it is not.
Yet you offer no argument to show how we can survive and thrive without competition.
I was simply answering a question, and I have never known competition to be necessary for survival.
Yet you knowingly do every time you compete for a job.
Getting paid as agreed for a job completed is not the same as competition.
No. They will go extinct on their own...
Why do you think we should try to live against natural law?
Where have I suggested we should?
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
No, it is not.
Yet you offer no argument to show how we can survive and thrive without competition.
I was simply answering a question, and I have never known competition to be necessary for survival.
Really? Name any animal that does not and indicate if you have done what you say can be done.
Yet you knowingly do every time you compete for a job.
Getting paid as agreed for a job completed is not the same as competition.
True, but you got paid because you won a competition against others for the job.
No. They will go extinct on their own...
Why do you think we should try to live against natural law?
Where have I suggested we should?
By saying you can do without a natural staple. Competition.
Regards
DL
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
Really? Name any animal that does not [compete] and indicate if you have done what you say can be done.
I thought we were talking about humans, and I have never needed to "take" at the expense of another human being in order to survive.
True, but...
Either that is true or it is not, and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do anyway -- is not the same as the kind of "competition" we are talking about.
By saying you can do without a natural staple. Competition.
Competition resulting in some people sitting at the banquet table while others starve is not required for human survival.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
Really? Name any animal that does not [compete] and indicate if you have done what you say can be done.
I thought we were talking about humans, and I have never needed to "take" at the expense of another human being in order to survive.
True, but...
Either that is true or it is not, and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do anyway -- is not the same as the kind of "competition" we are talking about.
By saying you can do without a natural staple. Competition.
Competition resulting in some people sitting at the banquet table while others starve is not required for human survival.
True. But we do not care for the victim we create as we are forced to compete.
"and "competing" for a job -- something I would not do"
Are you saying you have never competed for a job?
Regards
DL
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
I do not recall ever being forced to compete.
Are you saying you have never competed for a job?
Not that I can recall. I did once "compete" for the attention of a woman, but only once and that did not turn out any better for her or myself than for the suitor who "lost".
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
I do not recall ever being forced to compete.
Are you saying you have never competed for a job?
Not that I can recall. I did once "compete" for the attention of a woman, but only once and that did not turn out any better for her or myself than for the suitor who "lost".
Women are a recourse and men compete for resources.
Nice that jobs were just given to you without competition but I am sure that in school you competed for the best marks which likely is the competition you did to get that job offered to you without a direct competition for it.
Work with me pall. This is not rocket science.
Regards
DL
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
I do not consider women a resource, and willfully competing against another male while seeking a mate was one of the worst things I ever did in life.
No, and I once actually failed a forced competition intentionally so the other class could win the picnic trip.
Certainly not, and that is why I can easily see through your agenda even if I might not be able to precisely define it.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
I do not consider women a resource, and willfully competing against another male while seeking a mate was one of the worst things I ever did in life.
Sure beats an arranged loveless marriage.
Men are a resource to women and women are a resource to men, if we want to reproduce, --- and that is the first raison daître for our evolutionary drive.
No, and I once actually failed a forced competition intentionally so the other class could win the picnic trip.
Then you made a victim and did evil to the one who won as he did not earn the reward. If anything, you weakened his chances that might come later.
Certainly not, and that is why I can easily see through your agenda even if I might not be able to precisely define it.
I make no secret of my overall agenda.
Care to test your ability to read my agenda and also tell us why you do not like it?
That will tell me if I am reading your agenda correctly?
Regards
DL
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
I can read just fine, I do not have any agenda other than to de-bunk agendas and Scripture teaches me to think and act far differently than the ways you seem to presume to justify by claiming we must do evil in order to survive.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
I can read just fine, I do not have any agenda other than to de-bunk agendas and Scripture teaches me to think and act far differently than the ways you seem to presume to justify by claiming we must do evil in order to survive.
Yet you offer no argument to refute what I put.
If you think we can forgo evil, then show how as no animal I know of does not compete as well as cooperate when required.
Regards
DL
