Jacoby wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
The Deep State are people within the government/military/intelligence, mostly former Obama holdouts but also decrepit fossils like John McCain. That's where the leaks are from, it straight up sabotage and treason on their parts. The NWO is simply globalism and all those that support it, that's where the billionaire lobbyists/illuminati come in. These people have loyalty to no state, they want to lord over all of mankind under a one world government.
I have no loyalty to any state. I just follow my own self-interest.
A one-world government wouldn't automatically be bad. As long as it was democratic, I would be okay with it.
It's bad and anybody suggesting it is bad.
The Rules wrote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism.
You have made a generalised attack upon people suggesting a one-world government. Do you have a reason for labeling as "bad" people who suggest a one-world government?
30 May 2017, 6:09 pm
