Page 2 of 9 [ 143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

fifasy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Mar 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,264
Location: England

04 Mar 2018, 2:03 am

Have a watch of this video. It makes an interesting case for everyone needing a comfortable amount of our collective wealth and also it reveals what the 666 symbology of the devil actually means. It isn't a religious video by the way, it just references the Bible and explains what that part of it meant.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

04 Mar 2018, 2:06 am

Mudboy wrote:
If a person is able of body and mind, they need to get a job. Otherwise they are a depraved parasite, consuming charity that is intended for orphans, the disabled, and the elderly. Do ticks and lice have a basic right to live on your body too?

Very well said!
:wtg:

I bet someone will call you a troll and/or a bully before long.....if they haven't already.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

04 Mar 2018, 2:42 am

Pepe wrote:
Mudboy wrote:
Your reply makes no sense. In the US we have SSI, which is income given to disabled people. Autism is classified as a disability, because it makes people unable to work.


You mean *profound* autism "is classified as a disability because it makes people unable to work."
Most people with Aspergers can work effectively, some in a superior manner...

Most aspies have the skills to be productive employees but often can not get or keep a job because of social requirements that have nothing to do with making employers money. I would say that is true for “moderate” autistics also.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

04 Mar 2018, 2:55 am

Mikah wrote:
Has anyone done the maths? How much it would cost per annum and how much the effective tax percentage on workers/corporations would have to be etc. I have a suspicion it would be unworkably expensive.


It is my understanding that left wing politicians tend to simply advocate greater national debt...
They generally have no problem with this, based on my observation over here...
This was what ended Whitlam's prime ministership...



fluffysaurus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,723
Location: England

04 Mar 2018, 3:00 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mudboy wrote:
Your reply makes no sense. In the US we have SSI, which is income given to disabled people. Autism is classified as a disability, because it makes people unable to work.


You mean *profound* autism "is classified as a disability because it makes people unable to work."
Most people with Aspergers can work effectively, some in a superior manner...

Most aspies have the skills to be productive employees but often can not get or keep a job because of social requirements that have nothing to do with making employers money. I would say that is true for “moderate” autistics also.

Yes!

In the jobs I can get, I can work up to 16 hrs and not go mad.

In a job without the social interactions I would be able to work full time. I can't get any of these jobs, I've tried.



DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

04 Mar 2018, 3:15 am

Daniel89 wrote:
I disagree taking something from someone else is not your right.


Who owns the earth's natural resources?

In the Paleolithic era, it was generally understood that the fruit trees, the water, and the wild animals, and the land belong to everybody.

So ... when a small organisation takes control of the natural resources, isn't that stealing?


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


VIDEODROME
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,691

04 Mar 2018, 3:45 am

What if we don't call this a Right? I think many equate Right as specifically 'Human Rights' and makes this even more of a hot topic.

Suppose we just look at this as one of many Government Services and would primarily be funded by the taxing the 1% wealthiest people. I think this is a benefit returned even to them though as it keeps a stabilized consumer base instead of continuing on as we are until the Middle Class fades away. I think some wealthy people such as Nick Hanauer would agree and see the growing wealth gap as a serious problem.

Anyway, for a long time I think the opposite has been occuring anyway with Government forking over incentives to the very wealthy to lure companies. The more extreme example was massive bailouts under George W. Bush.. Could UBI also be seen as a necessary correction or a Bailout of the People to balance out the Bailouts to the Rich?



VIDEODROME
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,691

04 Mar 2018, 3:49 am

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Daniel89 wrote:
I disagree taking something from someone else is not your right.


Who owns the earth's natural resources?

In the Paleolithic era, it was generally understood that the fruit trees, the water, and the wild animals, and the land belong to everybody.

So ... when a small organisation takes control of the natural resources, isn't that stealing?



In modern times, I'd consider the natural resources as owned by the Nation which boils down to The People who should be represented by their government. I've often thought more compensation should come back in return for these Resource Rights. I think the Norway Model does include such an arrangement for their Oil which helps to fund their government and national healthcare.



Mudboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,441
Location: Hiding in plain sight

04 Mar 2018, 4:18 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mudboy wrote:
Your reply makes no sense. In the US we have SSI, which is income given to disabled people. Autism is classified as a disability, because it makes people unable to work.


You mean *profound* autism "is classified as a disability because it makes people unable to work."
Most people with Aspergers can work effectively, some in a superior manner...

Most aspies have the skills to be productive employees but often can not get or keep a job because of social requirements that have nothing to do with making employers money. I would say that is true for “moderate” autistics also.
About one third of the Aspies in my local support group are getting SSI because they can't work. Most of those on SSI are able to hold conversations, but not jobs.


_________________
When I lose an obsession, I feel lost until I find another.
Aspie score: 155 of 200
NT score: 49 of 200


Kiprobalhato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,119
Location: מתחת לעננים

04 Mar 2018, 4:21 am

Mudboy wrote:
If a person is able of body and mind, they need to get a job. Otherwise they are a depraved parasite, consuming charity that is intended for orphans, the disabled, and the elderly. Do ticks and lice have a basic right to live on your body too?


Quote:
If a person is able of body and mind


i'd agree with you but it seems a lot of trouble stems from that phrase, incredibly important, but very difficult to define.


_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.


Mudboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,441
Location: Hiding in plain sight

04 Mar 2018, 6:00 am

Kiprobalhato wrote:
Mudboy wrote:
If a person is able of body and mind, they need to get a job. Otherwise they are a depraved parasite, consuming charity that is intended for orphans, the disabled, and the elderly. Do ticks and lice have a basic right to live on your body too?


Quote:
If a person is able of body and mind


i'd agree with you but it seems a lot of trouble stems from that phrase, incredibly important, but very difficult to define.
I use the term "Able of body and mind" to mean "not disabled". Yes, it is difficult to define disability. For SSI, medical doctors, psychiatrists, lawyers, and judges make the official determination of who is disabled.


_________________
When I lose an obsession, I feel lost until I find another.
Aspie score: 155 of 200
NT score: 49 of 200


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

04 Mar 2018, 8:14 am

Mudboy wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mudboy wrote:
Your reply makes no sense. In the US we have SSI, which is income given to disabled people. Autism is classified as a disability, because it makes people unable to work.


You mean *profound* autism "is classified as a disability because it makes people unable to work."
Most people with Aspergers can work effectively, some in a superior manner...

Most aspies have the skills to be productive employees but often can not get or keep a job because of social requirements that have nothing to do with making employers money. I would say that is true for “moderate” autistics also.
About one third of the Aspies in my local support group are getting SSI because they can't work. Most of those on SSI are able to hold conversations, but not jobs.


Do they still try to find a job?



Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

04 Mar 2018, 11:27 am

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Daniel89 wrote:
I disagree taking something from someone else is not your right.


Who owns the earth's natural resources?

In the Paleolithic era, it was generally understood that the fruit trees, the water, and the wild animals, and the land belong to everybody.

So ... when a small organisation takes control of the natural resources, isn't that stealing?


Yes it is. Here in the UK is a huge problem the upper classes stole all the land in the country and forced people to pay taxes to enrich themselves to this day the richest Briton is the Duke of Westminster. I would support seizure without compensation of this wealth as it was stolen from the British people in the first place. I don't think we are entitled to the value produced by another persons labour.



DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

04 Mar 2018, 11:56 am

Daniel89 wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Daniel89 wrote:
I disagree taking something from someone else is not your right.


Who owns the earth's natural resources?

In the Paleolithic era, it was generally understood that the fruit trees, the water, and the wild animals, and the land belong to everybody.

So ... when a small organisation takes control of the natural resources, isn't that stealing?


Yes it is. Here in the UK is a huge problem the upper classes stole all the land in the country and forced people to pay taxes to enrich themselves to this day the richest Briton is the Duke of Westminster. I would support seizure without compensation of this wealth as it was stolen from the British people in the first place. I don't think we are entitled to the value produced by another persons labour.


That sounds like something a socialist would say. :lol:


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


katy_rome
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2016
Gender: Female
Posts: 232
Location: UK

04 Mar 2018, 12:16 pm

thinkinginpictures wrote:
http://basicincome.org/basic-income/

Read this, if you don't know what it is, better read it so we don't have to cover yet another thread after thread on how a welfare society should pay for basic income, what basic income is and what it covers.

But to sum it up it is basically a sum of money that is given to every citizen as a right (like a right to free speech, right to assembly, right to vote etc.). There are several versions of Basic Income. One is that every citizen gets a sum of money regardless of whether you work or not. Another version is one where if you already earn money, you don't get the payment, or your Basic Income gets reduced by say 30 % of what you already earn. This leaves more money for those who have no other income.

Finland is currently doing experiments with Basic Income. Basically it is unemployment benefits but without requirement to work or find a job. Initial tests reveal it works. It doesn't keep people unemployed, quite the contrary people are more motivated to find a job because they are not stressed over finding a job or get food on the table.

People argue that only those incapable of work should get money without work requirements, like disability benefits. But the truth is that disability benefits around the world has been cut and work requirements are already in place.

Google "Atos death toll" and you'll see just how UK is currently killing off disabled people by work requirements despite doctors warnings against it. Several thousands of disabled people have been killed during these work requirements.

The same thing currently happens in Denmark and Sweden, where they used to treat disabled people with care and respect but today they are actually demanding that they work despite work being counter-productive because of their disabilities or illnesses.

This is why I suggest Basic Income should be a citizen right. Like the right to vote or assembly or free speech.

- Because the social welfare system does not work at all.


I've studied this in depth and I could not agree more.

At the moment monetary reward is almost entirely unlinked to how constructive what you do is - by that I mean how much it helps you, others, the community, humanity, the planet. In fact a lot of the time it seems almost to actually be inversely related! (e.g. the caring and environmental professions are generally low- or un-paid, while e.g. banking and fracking are rather lucrative)

Also the assumption is that people are lazy and selfish and need to be forced and coerced into doing anything useful. If you have seen unschooled children you will know that this is absolute rubbish - it is our system that makes us into vegetables.



Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

04 Mar 2018, 12:16 pm

Nope I am a capitalist. I am opposed to feudalism I am opposed to oligarchy. The Gaddafi family stole about $200bn from Libya its not socialist for the people to take that back.