I'll probably give this a read sooner or later, considering I personally know multiple psych folks anyway. Yeah, they smoke too.
Mikah wrote:
cberg wrote:
Mikah wrote:
cberg wrote:
Correlation is not a scientific measure at all.
How do you think causation is discovered in the first place, particularly in the field of health?
That's called biochemistry.
Would you just read it already? The article even says "correlation is not causation". Further, correlation is how you find causation in epidemiology. There is a very strong, meaningful, correlation between long term cannabis usage and permanent, often violent mental health conditions. As you already stated (assuming
wrongly that such a thing wasn't in the review) science knows very little about the brain and its functioning. Thus causation may never be conclusively proved, at least not any time soon and correlation is all we may ever have to go on when choosing our public health policies in this area. If we're wrong it could be
disastrous. If you'd actually
read it you might be arguing against
that position not the one you so lazily assumed was made. Instead you continue to make an arse of yourself. Carry on.
Any neuroscientist will tell you their field is in its' infancy. We know more about the surface of the moon or the bottom of the Marianas trench.
Causation in epidemeology is found using one of these, correlation only draws the maps.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
