Antrax wrote:
shlaifu wrote:
Antrax wrote:
shlaifu wrote:
Antrax wrote:
I have no issue with affordable safety nets and poverty alleviation. The problem is when the social programs overrun the economic productivity of a country as seen in Greece, the economy collapses under the crushing debt. Norway, Sweden et. al have a huge natural resources to population ratio that allows them to provide some hefty social benefits without outrunning their economies.
That's not what ruined greece, btw.
Please entertain me with tales of what actually ruined Greece. Be as factual as you can be.
let me google that for you:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government-debt_crisis#CausesUsually good in an argument when citing a source to have that source support what you're actually arguing.
From the Wikipedia article (emphasis mine):
"In January 2010, the Greek Ministry of Finance published Stability and Growth Program 2010.[30] The report listed five main causes,
poor GDP growth, government debt and deficits, budget compliance and data credibility. Causes found by others included
excess government spending, current account deficits, tax avoidance and tax evasion"
Now where did that deficit and overspending come from:
Greek "social expenditure" (as a percent of GDP)
2000: 17.8
2005: 19.9
2010: 24.9
2015: 25.4
United States "social expenditure":
2000: 14.3
2005: 15.6
2010: 19.4
2015: 18.8
Canada "social expenditure":
2000: 15.8
2005: 16.1
2010: 17.5
2015: 17.6
OECD average "social expenditure":
2000: 17.4
2005: 18.2
2010: 20.6
2015: 19.0
Source:
https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG#Now Greece isn't the only country with high social expenditure, but they did have a debt crisis because their government spending outpaced their economic growth.
Except that the numbers you give show social expenditure in % of GDP.
Until 2008, social expenditure is at comparable percentage with US and other countries.
THEN the crisis hits and AFTER the crisis the percentage goes up.
Note: after the crisis, GDP goes down, so if social expenditure stays the same, its percentage of GDP goes up.
Now to some things in the wikipedia article you seem to have not read carefully: Greece was/is corrupt and bad at collecting taxes.
Greece had the highest military spendings in % of GDP in the EU.
Their social spending however, according to the numbers you found, were average.
They cut down on that now, though, meaning: cutting pensions, cutting healthcare (I read about widespread multiple use of single-use items in hospitals.)
They did however buy two submarines from Germany in 2010 and paid their debt to German banks, which would otherwise have collapsed.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.