Tim_Tex wrote:
I think it should mostly be done as a last resort, when not done because of rape, incest or danger to the mother. I think other options, such as adoption, should be considered if possible.
As for the legality of abortion, most restrictions won’t survive a Supreme Court battle, especially not the “heartbeat” laws or the one passed in Alabama. Those laws were meant to be a form of extreme slut-shaming, and were never about “protecting life.”
I find the terms “pro-life” and “pro-choice” to be misleading. If you oppose abortion, but not war or the death penalty, you are not pro-life. If you support abortion, but constantly shame people who want to be parents, you are not pro-choice.
I simply say pro- or anti-abortion.
So, are you saying that running the kid through a meat grinder for food is a better choice than abortion?