Bravo5150 wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
It would be like China during its various "warring states" periods when each province was its own country.
Iowa would have to support its own military to defend its borders against invasion by Minnesota, and Nebraska. And so on. All interstate commerce would become international trade, and subject to tariffs. Hobbling the economies of each of the fifty states. I don't see any upside to it. Just wars and poverty.
If states banded together to form large regional countries with parts of the US joining parts of Canada (the Maritime Provinces merging with New England say) then you might have some interesting changes that might work culturally and economically.
And you forgot to mention how Utah would be overrun in a week by invading forces. All of their guards would be too busy procreating.
Mormons don't do it anymore than anyone else. They just don't use protection. On one hand Utah (and Nevada) have low population densities. So any armies they would raise would be easily overwhelmed by their bigger population neighbors. But on the flipside - Utah is a desert that no one would bother to conquer. So it evens out. Utah might remain independent. In fact it could even be a thorn in the side of its neighbors.
Utah (from what I gather from refuges from that state) is already heavily Mormon dominated. It would revert to the even more thoroughly theocratic culture it had in the old west days. And Mormon culture spills over the state lines into Idaho and northern Arizona (the most fanatical polygamous Mormon community is Colorado City in northern Arizona). So there would be irredentist movements in neighboring states by Mormons seaking unity with the Utah fatherland (kinda like the Sudetenland Germans in Czechoslavakia). Utah would demand slices of Idaho, Arizona, and maybe Nevada. Causing wars with its neighbors.