Do you believe in “climate doom”?

Post Reply New Topic

No I believe with the power of science we can find a way to keep the planet habitable. Yeah its warming, that is already done...but may be possible to stop continuing damage and even reverse some that has already been done.

Of course to do that the nations of the world need to embrace science...so I guess we will see.

To me, its sort of like the fear of nuclear war during the Cold War. Yes, the bombs were real. Yes, we could have all been wiped out. Read or watch any sci-fi from the time period. Like, 1/3 of the episodes of the original "Twilight Zone" are about the fear of nuclear war. Apparently this was still a thing when I was growing up in the 1980s, but I was totally unaware of it. And yet here we all still are, worrying that something else is going to wipe us out.

What's interesting to me is that the fears of climate doom seemed to take over just exactly when people became less worried about nuclear war. (It could still happen, but most people aren't building bomb shelters in their basements these days.) The Berlin Wall fell in 1989. "Captain Planet" premiered in 1990, opening every episode with the line "our world is in peril." In "Superman IV: The Quest for Peace" (1987), Superman tries to end nuclear war while the villain and his cronies want to keep it going. In "Captain America" (1990), Captain America tries to save an environmentalist president from the villain and his cronies, who want to keep polluting. "The Day the Earth Stood Still," the famous 1951 anti-nuclear-war film, was remade in 2008 with an environmental message.

Again, this doesn't mean the threat isn't real. It's just interesting to me how we, as a society, seem to have a need to believe we're on the brink of doom. And what is the reason for both of these particular dooms? "Man's hubris." Except with the nuclear doom, the scientists were the example of hubris, messing with forces that should have been left alone. With the climate doom narrative, somehow the hubris belongs to the average person who drives to work in the morning, while the scientists are our saviors. (I have nothing against scientists either. I'm just talking about how the narrative is spun.)

Alien bookies will be taking bets to see whether pandemic or global warming or electing crazy people to run the world will kill us off first

I agree, option 3 is likely the source of option 1

Climate change topics always end the same.

What can be done when people are the problem?

It would be so much easier to believe if the prophets weren't investing in ocean-front properties, or houses which required more resources to build and/or maintain than those of the people they are trying to pursuade to believe their prophecies...

People living up to what they preach are rare in general.

Do you not associate fire with heat?

There have been record wildfires on both sides of the planet for the last year.

We are not discussing "prophecies", we are discussing gridded numbers from infrared imaging satellites.

_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos