Redd_Kross wrote:
Fnord wrote:
It still shows racial bias, as the man has a full, dark beard and straight hair. This precludes those ethnicities that have sparse beards and kinky-curly hair.
It also shows sexual bias, in that the woman is depicted as smaller in stature than the man.
Is it incorrect to assume that women are generally shorter than men, then? Only that's generally been my experience. If anything I'd say the difference in height between genders has reduced over time, not grown. Admittedly that is based almost entirely on my Grandad on my mother's side being 6'2" and my Grandma being 4'10" though.
That was nit pick at best. Many animals have "sexual dimorphism" (the sexes are built different). And humans are one example. Not the most extreme example, but an example. And size can be part of the dimorphism. Spider females are way bigger than males. And male gorillas are quite a bit bigger than females.
Humans have a less extreme version of the size divergence of gorillas. So to show a human couple with the male slightly bigger is fine. Granted that there more overlap in size between the human sexes than there is among spiders or gorillas, but statistically males are on average bigger. So if you wanna cast actors to play the first human couple its believable to make the dude a tad taller.