Brictoria wrote:
I think it comes back to a difference in the founding of the countries: (etc.)
Everything you say is reasonable and probably quite accurate as it concerns Australia.
Your points regarding the US are off target regarding the present day situation. So the right to keep and bear arms is the 2nd Amendment to our Constitution. The first 10 amendments were added after somebody complained that the constitution did nothing to guarantee individual rights. Unfortunately, most Americans think these 10 amendments are in fact the Constitution which makes dialog very difficult.
The prevailing interpretation (corroborated by recent Supreme Court decisions I believe although please don't ask for details) is that the 2nd Amendment prohibits any sort of restriction on purchase or ownership of firearms of any sort, period. Any suggestion that this view should be tempered in respect to differences between societal and technological circumstances in the late 18th and the present are summarily dismissed. BTW this is because the Supreme Court is guided by a principle of "strict constructionism" if that helps any.
In conclusion, most Americans believe that ownership and use of firearms is effectively a god-given right of all free men.
So when I suggest many Americans would view Australian restrictions on gun ownership as fascist, I am not exaggerating.