Page 2 of 9 [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

14 May 2022, 6:32 pm

Fnord wrote:
"Quiverfull" is a white supremacist cult wherein the goal is to have as many white children as possible and then send those kids out into the world like "arrows" (a "quiver" is a term that refers to a case archers use to hold their arrows) to spread the word of the Bible.  Quiverfull is described as an organization that would feel right at home in The Handmaids Tale, where women are seen as breeders to create more followers of the verse and indoctrinate others.

It is not just the "breeding" angle that draws attention, but the fact members of Quiverfull are careful to only produce white children due to fears the "white race" would one day disappear.  And if you look closely, they are almost all blue-eyed blonds.  One documentary subject describes them as looking like the "perfect Aryan clan".

Quiverfull members believe they are meant to raise a conservative Christian army.  The underlying basis of the group is to shun contraception as they believe God will only give them as many children as they can handle.


Read the Full Story
 HERE 


Are there any non-white groups who also advocate the preservation of their ethnic genetic coding?



Carpeta
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2020
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,829
Location: Aisle 12: Office Supplies

14 May 2022, 6:44 pm

Twilightprincess wrote:
It’s an umbrella term for a religious movement with varying levels of beliefs and strictness (although they are all against birth control). Some groups let women wear pants; others make them wear prairie dresses. Fnord’s post is not an exaggeration although it might seem like such if one was raised in a more liberal subgroup.


That makes sense. If "Quiverfull" is just an umbrella term for all the people I knew and others more or less extreme, then to describe it as a "cult" seems like an exaggeration -- no clear group, no leader, no membership rolls, nobody keeping track if you stay or leave, nobody stalking you for stepping out of line. I'd say IBLP was a cult (albeit not as scary or all-consuming as David Koresh level), and it was solidly on the "prairie dress" side of things, though my particular family was pretty liberal for being in the group.

I have a lot of sympathy for the Duggar children, now largely the Duggar young adults. They have negative celebrity status not of their own choosing. I cannot imagine the strain on my mental health it would be to see myself in a photo in an ugly article like this. I wish their parents had given them privacy and that journalists wouldn't do this to them. I wish it were illegal to publicize anything about children to be mocked by the masses. :(


_________________
AQ ave: 29.11 // AQ-10 ave: 7.74
EQ ave: 25.0
rdos averages: Aspie 121 // NT 85.3
RAADS-R: 122.0

Not a doctor.


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,581

14 May 2022, 6:49 pm

Carpeta wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
It’s an umbrella term for a religious movement with varying levels of beliefs and strictness (although they are all against birth control). Some groups let women wear pants; others make them wear prairie dresses. Fnord’s post is not an exaggeration although it might seem like such if one was raised in a more liberal subgroup.


That makes sense. If "Quiverfull" is just an umbrella term for all the people I knew and others more or less extreme, then to describe it as a "cult" seems like an exaggeration -- no clear group, no leader, no membership rolls, nobody keeping track if you stay or leave, nobody stalking you for stepping out of line. I'd say IBLP was a cult (albeit not as scary or all-consuming as David Koresh level), and it was solidly on the "prairie dress" side of things, though my particular family was pretty liberal for being in the group.

I have a lot of sympathy for the Duggar children, now largely the Duggar young adults. They have negative celebrity status not of their own choosing. I cannot imagine the strain on my mental health it would be to see myself in a photo in an ugly article like this. I wish their parents had given them privacy and that journalists wouldn't do this to them. I wish it were illegal to publicize anything about children to be mocked by the masses. :(


I think that most groups that are under the quiverfull movement umbrella, including the more liberal ones, would still meet enough criteria to be considered cults. Some cults are more extreme than others, but if a group exerts a lot of control over its members, especially about something as fundamental as birth control, it’s a cult.


_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot


Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 14 May 2022, 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Carpeta
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2020
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,829
Location: Aisle 12: Office Supplies

14 May 2022, 6:58 pm

Twilightprincess wrote:
I think that most groups that are in the quiverfull movement, including the more liberal ones, would still meet the criteria to be considered a cult. Some cults are more extreme than others, but if a group exerts a lot of control over their members, especially about something like birth control, it’s a cult.


Fair enough. The article says Quiverfull is "a cult," "an organization," not a movement or collection of cults. I think it's an important distinction. I'm wondering, if the article was sloppy about that, what else is being sensationalized? Honestly it seems like very poor journalism.


_________________
AQ ave: 29.11 // AQ-10 ave: 7.74
EQ ave: 25.0
rdos averages: Aspie 121 // NT 85.3
RAADS-R: 122.0

Not a doctor.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

14 May 2022, 6:59 pm

shlaifu wrote:
Fnord wrote:
 HERE  is another website revealing several truths behind the "Quiverfull" movement.  Some tenets of this movement include:

• Patriarchy: the belief that by God’s perfect design, it is the father who is the head of the home. In his leadership capacity, the father serves as protector, provider and shepherd for his wife and children.

• Courtship/Betrothal: Instead of dating, if a young man is interested in a particular girl, he will consult with his father who then approaches the father of the young lady to discuss the possibility of a potential match. If the girl’s father is in agreement, he will then talk to his daughter, and if she shows an interest, the courtship/betrothal (which is as binding as marriage) begins and this basically means that the couple is serious about getting married.

• Sheltering of Children: Children are to be protected and sheltered from “the world”; specifically, "Quiverfull" children should not be socialized by other children (fools). Isolation and control of outside influences is not only considered normal and good.

• Biblical Manhood & Womanhood: Men are to be leaders, teachers, initiators, protectors and providers. Women are to be submissive and yielding to their husbands, and their primary sphere of influence comes from their role as wives and mothers.

• Being Debt-Free: Adoption of this ideal often leads to financial hardship and deprivation in large families. In order to achieve financial independence, a QF/P family will often move to a rural location or live in sub-standard housing. Wives often operate businesses out of their home, often employing the children to help with the work, in order to supplement the husband’s income.

• Independence from Government Programs & Subsidies: Refusal of government assistance sometimes means that these families go without medical insurance -- a situation which can influence the parents to choose non-medicinal (e.g., "natural") remedies, and includes home birth and similar non-medical approaches to family health.

• Home Church: The father is primarily seen as the conveyor of spiritual guidance and teaching.

• Modesty: A girl or woman whose clothing is revealing is guilty of defrauding her Christian brothers, because she is tempting them with impure thoughts in relation to her body. There are no such restrictions on boys and men.


So... This sounds basically the some as just regular Hinduism with a different mascot.


Could you expand on this?



TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,581

14 May 2022, 7:06 pm

Carpeta wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
I think that most groups that are in the quiverfull movement, including the more liberal ones, would still meet the criteria to be considered a cult. Some cults are more extreme than others, but if a group exerts a lot of control over their members, especially about something like birth control, it’s a cult.


Fair enough. The article says Quiverfull is "a cult," "an organization," not a movement or collection of cults. I think it's an important distinction. I'm wondering, if the article was sloppy about that, what else is being sensationalized? Honestly it seems like very poor journalism.


Normally, the term “quiverfull movement” is referring to the IBLP and groups that have broken off from it. It’s really not that sensationalized although they could have said “cults” instead of “cult,” I suppose. It’s a collection of numerous groups, the majority of which are small, with very similar ideological values and a few, insignificant, doctrinal differences.

If people are concerned about the veracity of this article, there’s no shortage of others to reference.


_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot


SkinnedWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2022
Age: 27
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,538
Location: China

14 May 2022, 7:21 pm

Pepe wrote:
Are there any non-white groups who also advocate the preservation of their ethnic genetic coding?

I'm not sure if Haredi Jews had similar claims, but they accomplished similar results.
Certainly, they could count as whites.

Singapore is strictly controlling the proportion of the three ethnic groups, making it the same as when they established the country.
Although they don't rely on fertility to accomplish this.


_________________
With the help of translation software.

Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.

You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

14 May 2022, 7:26 pm

SkinnedWolf wrote:
I'm more curious how they make sure they have enough uterus to work with?
What kind of womb owner would want to join this?


If this requires relying on "womb missionary". That is, "teach" their female children.
I would consider this downright evil.


Hitler's Germany had a similar policy.
Women would be awarded medals depending on how many children they produced.
In that situation, it was national pride fueling much of the baby factory thinking.

And while ethnicity wasn't the concern, The Catholic church also had the policy of breeding more Catholics, hence the emphasis on not "wasting" sperm or using contraception.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

14 May 2022, 7:29 pm

SkinnedWolf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Are there any non-white groups who also advocate the preservation of their ethnic genetic coding?

I'm not sure if Haredi Jews had similar claims, but they accomplished similar results.
Certainly, they could count as whites.

Singapore is strictly controlling the proportion of the three ethnic groups, making it the same as when they established the country.
Although they don't rely on fertility to accomplish this.


I have heard some people on WP talk about how some Native Amuurian groups also embrace "genetic conservation".



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

14 May 2022, 7:34 pm

Carpeta wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
It’s an umbrella term for a religious movement with varying levels of beliefs and strictness (although they are all against birth control). Some groups let women wear pants; others make them wear prairie dresses. Fnord’s post is not an exaggeration although it might seem like such if one was raised in a more liberal subgroup.


That makes sense. If "Quiverfull" is just an umbrella term for all the people I knew and others more or less extreme, then to describe it as a "cult" seems like an exaggeration -- no clear group, no leader, no membership rolls, nobody keeping track if you stay or leave, nobody stalking you for stepping out of line. I'd say IBLP was a cult (albeit not as scary or all-consuming as David Koresh level), and it was solidly on the "prairie dress" side of things, though my particular family was pretty liberal for being in the group.

I have a lot of sympathy for the Duggar children, now largely the Duggar young adults. They have negative celebrity status not of their own choosing. I cannot imagine the strain on my mental health it would be to see myself in a photo in an ugly article like this. I wish their parents had given them privacy and that journalists wouldn't do this to them. I wish it were illegal to publicize anything about children to be mocked by the masses. :(


Don't quote me, but I think Australia is very good this way, protecting children's identity.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

14 May 2022, 7:35 pm

Most ethnic groups are into that, at least to some extent. If there is not much contact with outsiders, at least some ethnic groups believe that they are, in a loose sense, the “chosen ones,” and that they must maintain their genealogical lines in order not to go extinct.



TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,581

14 May 2022, 7:35 pm

Pepe wrote:
SkinnedWolf wrote:
I'm more curious how they make sure they have enough uterus to work with?
What kind of womb owner would want to join this?


If this requires relying on "womb missionary". That is, "teach" their female children.
I would consider this downright evil.


Hitler's Germany had a similar policy.
Women would be awarded medals depending on how many children they produced.
In that situation, it was national pride fueling much of the baby factory thinking.

And while ethnicity wasn't the concern, The Catholic church also had the policy of breeding more Catholics, hence the emphasis on not "wasting" sperm or using contraception.


At least some quiverfullers are racist based on specific Bible accounts which they misread, especially the Curse of Ham and, occasionally, Biblical slavery. They also tend to see America as the Promised Land and are highly patriotic, so they glory in the notion of a white, Christian, patriarchal America.

That’s not to say that other groups don’t have similar ideologies, but this is one of the harmful trends of this particular movement.


_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot


Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 14 May 2022, 7:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.

SkinnedWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2022
Age: 27
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,538
Location: China

14 May 2022, 7:35 pm

Pepe wrote:
I have heard some people on WP talk about how some Native Amuurian groups also embrace "genetic conservation".

https://www.wbur.org/npr/134421470/native-american-intermarriage-puts-benefits-at-risk
Quote:
Native American Intermarriage Puts Benefits At Risk

Native Americans intermarry at higher rates than any other group in the country, according to U.S. Census data.

For the Eastern Shoshone of Wyoming, you have to be at least one-quarter Native American to be a tribal member. That requirement could mean a loss of both population and identity. And intermarriage can also lead to a loss of federal benefits.

Given current policies, failure to do so could render them literally extinct.


_________________
With the help of translation software.

Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.

You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,581

14 May 2022, 7:37 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Most ethnic groups are into that, at least to some extent. If there is not much contact with outsiders, at least some ethnic groups believe that they are, in a loose sense, the “chosen ones,” and that they must maintain their genealogical lines in order not to go extinct.


I think this harkens back to our evolutionary tribal roots.


_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

14 May 2022, 7:45 pm

Yep. To the days where individuals’ survival hung by a thread.

We probably don’t want to know the infant mortality rates of Cro-Magnons.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

14 May 2022, 7:46 pm

SkinnedWolf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I have heard some people on WP talk about how some Native Amuurian groups also embrace "genetic conservation".

https://www.wbur.org/npr/134421470/native-american-intermarriage-puts-benefits-at-risk
Quote:
Native American Intermarriage Puts Benefits At Risk

Native Americans intermarry at higher rates than any other group in the country, according to U.S. Census data.

For the Eastern Shoshone of Wyoming, you have to be at least one-quarter Native American to be a tribal member. That requirement could mean a loss of both population and identity. And intermarriage can also lead to a loss of federal benefits.

Given current policies, failure to do so could render them literally extinct.


As you know, I am anti-procreation, but that doesn't mean I can't have an objective appreciation of their position.
I don't see the Native Amuurian desire to maintain their "race" as intrinsically wrong, so I find it confusing when other races also want to do this but are criticised.

To be clear:
I am not defending "Quiverfull".
It is the principle that I am focusing on.