Quote:
If an alpha needs a coalition to achieve dominance, then it's not really much of an alpha, is it? If the group is the reason for success, it was the group that succeeded, not the individual.
Yes and no; but the alpha has perks. Like the president having the perk to live in the White house for example.

The alpha chimp has the most access to sex, while the subordinates has some.
In Gorillas, the dominant silverback is the only one with total access to sex.
Chimps defintely have a very complicated social structure, more complex than the extreme polygynous gorillas indeed, read:
https://phys.org/news/2016-11-chimpanze ... -high.htmlQuote:
Furthermore, if, as you agree, survival is tantamount, then a "beta" who continues to survive, while "alphas" are systematically replaced one after the other, is the one achieving the goal. And survival is what counts, right?
A study showed that the alpha chimps has higher level of cortisols, which means their live isn't bed of roses, it's stressful; because they can be killed/overthrowed in any moment.
Quote:
Red-pill or not, I still generally only hear "alpha" talk from the kinds of people who seek power, and want to justify taking it.
Rest assured, I have zero ambition to rule the world, or to rule anything.
uncommondenominator wrote:
Having said that, what exactly is the point of this discussion? So humans have no "real alpha males". So what? Why does this matter? Who cares? I mean, neat "fact" or w/e, but, other than file it away with the number of dimples on a golf ball, how is this of interest or benefit?
Simply put, what's your angle here?
What's the point of the forums if not for discussions?
There's no agenda, you're trying very hard to expose a hidden agenda here, but there's none, stop trying.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 13 Mar 2023, 2:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.