SailorsGuy12 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
SailorsGuy12 wrote:
If that kind of thinking is becoming normalized, then I am scared for mankind.
Which kind of thinking?
The thinking that the Bible should be abolished.
When people want to criticize and speak against it, that's one thing, but don't force or make laws persecuting others that read it (whether they are actually religious or otherwise) or practice it.
I would rather both Christians being allowed to make public displays of religion and the same co-existing for other beliefs.

I agree it probably shouldn't actually be abolished, but I don't think mere discussion over whether it should be abolished is a problem.
If the same standards the book-banners want to see applied to modern literature was applied to the bible the bible would be banned, and that's a worthwhile discussion to have if only to twist those people's arms into accepting the other books not being banned as well.
So long as the real goal isn't to ban books, but to protect books from being banned, I see no issue with discussions over the bible being fair game to ban.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.