Page 2 of 4 [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Joybob
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 460

02 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm

Macbeth wrote:
Joybob wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
peebo wrote:
yes, but regardless, the majority of america's black population are the descendents of slaves. i don't really think that point can be argued, although please coorect me if i am mistaken.

i am not sure of the relevence of the rest of your post in the context of my statement.


I'm not disputing the fact that a large majority are descendants of slaves. I was merely clarifying the fallacy suggested by your post that if not for slavery, there would be no black americans.

The rest: Your post seemed to suggest that in some way, whites are to be held responsible for racism they may suffer at the hands of these ex-slave. Something along the lines of "If you hadnt brought them, you wouldnt have to take their sh**." I felt that a little clarification about relative guilt might be in order.


You could also point out the more blatant fallacy/irony of blaming children for what their parents did.


True indeed. I have no intention of copping the blame for any activity performed by people before I was born. Nobody alive today is guilty of this slavery of black people in america. I also would like to see some due thanks as well, given that I am British, and we went out of our way to end the slave trade.


The problem would be that if we both agree that nobody alive today is to blame for Slavery, then we must also agree that nobody deserves thanks for ending it.



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

03 Oct 2007, 9:00 am

Joybob wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Joybob wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
peebo wrote:
yes, but regardless, the majority of america's black population are the descendents of slaves. i don't really think that point can be argued, although please coorect me if i am mistaken.

i am not sure of the relevence of the rest of your post in the context of my statement.


I'm not disputing the fact that a large majority are descendants of slaves. I was merely clarifying the fallacy suggested by your post that if not for slavery, there would be no black americans.

The rest: Your post seemed to suggest that in some way, whites are to be held responsible for racism they may suffer at the hands of these ex-slave. Something along the lines of "If you hadnt brought them, you wouldnt have to take their sh**." I felt that a little clarification about relative guilt might be in order.


You could also point out the more blatant fallacy/irony of blaming children for what their parents did.


True indeed. I have no intention of copping the blame for any activity performed by people before I was born. Nobody alive today is guilty of this slavery of black people in america. I also would like to see some due thanks as well, given that I am British, and we went out of our way to end the slave trade.


The problem would be that if we both agree that nobody alive today is to blame for Slavery, then we must also agree that nobody deserves thanks for ending it.


True, true, though the occasional mention of our role wouldnt go amiss. Just for politeness sakes really.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

03 Oct 2007, 9:20 am

Macbeth wrote:
The rest: Your post seemed to suggest that in some way, whites are to be held responsible for racism they may suffer at the hands of these ex-slave. Something along the lines of "If you hadnt brought them, you wouldnt have to take their sh**." I felt that a little clarification about relative guilt might be in order.


well, i don't think i implicitly suggested anything like this. however, to respond generally to the point you are trying to make, since the abolition of slavery, blacks in america have generally suffered from racism in some way or another until the present day. so you cannot therefore compare the racism of say for instance, white supremacist types with that of black people. the reasons for it are profoundly different. and bear in mind i am speaking generally here, although i think my case could be extended to most instances that you might consider.


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


frankwah
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 325

03 Oct 2007, 10:57 am

I've been discriminated against before because I am white. I used to work in a liquor store where many of our customers were black. At one point when I was working it seemed that every day black people would come in and cause a scene. They would never fail to interpret something I said or did in a way that was racist. So they would constantly erroneously be accusing me of racism, even when I did nothing to warrant such accusations. The blacks in that area were overly ready to pull out the race card, and they seemed to enjoy making a racial matter out of absolutely nothing. It was really hard for me to believe the ways they would twist facts to make and show the point that they are black and I am white and that I somehow owe them something.



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

03 Oct 2007, 2:37 pm

Cyanide wrote:
MysteryFan3 wrote:
Turks and Armenians have been arrested in the US for fighting because of thousand-year-old conflicts.

Oh man there are a lot of nationalities that hate each other besides that: The Greeks and Turks, the English and French (especially in Canada), the Belgians and Dutch, Central Europe and the Gypsies, Indians and Pakistanis, the Chinese and the Japanese, the Koreans and the Japanese, various African tribes, the Tibetans and the Chinese....and the list goes on.


Whew! I'm glad no one hates Jews anymore.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


pbcoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,892
Location: the City of Palaces

03 Oct 2007, 3:01 pm

I have been harassed due to race in several places (and was nearly beaten up by some black kids in the US in an incident that quite possibly was racially motivated - they were not trying to steal anything from me, i did not know them, they were all black and i am not - definitely at least in the North blacks are more racist than whites). The most verbal abuse, in proportion to the time spent there, was in Paris (I was mistaken for an Algerian). Fairly recently in England I was verbally abused due to being mistaken for a Muslim (they knew nothing about me other than how i look, so it was sort of a racial thing). i suffered verbal abuse in scotland once, which isn't that much given the time i spent there.

from what i've seen and experienced, the two most racist countries I've been to are France and Mexico.



Joybob
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 460

04 Oct 2007, 12:07 am

Ragtime wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
MysteryFan3 wrote:
Turks and Armenians have been arrested in the US for fighting because of thousand-year-old conflicts.

Oh man there are a lot of nationalities that hate each other besides that: The Greeks and Turks, the English and French (especially in Canada), the Belgians and Dutch, Central Europe and the Gypsies, Indians and Pakistanis, the Chinese and the Japanese, the Koreans and the Japanese, various African tribes, the Tibetans and the Chinese....and the list goes on.


Whew! I'm glad no one hates Jews anymore.


A little anti-semitism never hurt anyone.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

04 Oct 2007, 12:16 am

Ragtime wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
MysteryFan3 wrote:
Turks and Armenians have been arrested in the US for fighting because of thousand-year-old conflicts.

Oh man there are a lot of nationalities that hate each other besides that: The Greeks and Turks, the English and French (especially in Canada), the Belgians and Dutch, Central Europe and the Gypsies, Indians and Pakistanis, the Chinese and the Japanese, the Koreans and the Japanese, various African tribes, the Tibetans and the Chinese....and the list goes on.


Whew! I'm glad no one hates Jews anymore.


For once, I agree with your sarcasm.



Cyanide
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,003
Location: The Pacific Northwest

04 Oct 2007, 1:58 am

Flagg wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
MysteryFan3 wrote:
Turks and Armenians have been arrested in the US for fighting because of thousand-year-old conflicts.

Oh man there are a lot of nationalities that hate each other besides that: The Greeks and Turks, the English and French (especially in Canada), the Belgians and Dutch, Central Europe and the Gypsies, Indians and Pakistanis, the Chinese and the Japanese, the Koreans and the Japanese, various African tribes, the Tibetans and the Chinese....and the list goes on.


Whew! I'm glad no one hates Jews anymore.


For once, I agree with your sarcasm.


Hey! I said the list goes on.....



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

04 Oct 2007, 2:34 am

peebo wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
if it weren't for white people, black people would be some of the most racist people in the country.


bear in mind though that if it weren't for white people, black people likely wouldn't be in the country. things really have to be put in context.



i always do. it doesn't help them, though...and many of their "leaders" should be smart enough to know better and to act accordingly. but maybe i'm holding them too high? my favorite black leaders so far have been huey newton and bill cosby.....they seem/ed to actually have it somewhat together.



DrizzleMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 887

04 Oct 2007, 8:11 am

Racism is based on assumptions, none of which can be true for all members of the race in question.

In the case of feuding nationalities, there are some legitimate grievances. But hating people because of something their fellow nationals did will only lead to more grief. It's a really stupid way to live.


_________________
The plural of platypus.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

04 Oct 2007, 9:22 am

I've been called lots of rude names by Mexican people, but they do it to everyone who they think doesn't understand what they're saying. It sucks.



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

04 Oct 2007, 10:53 am

peebo wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
The rest: Your post seemed to suggest that in some way, whites are to be held responsible for racism they may suffer at the hands of these ex-slave. Something along the lines of "If you hadnt brought them, you wouldnt have to take their sh**." I felt that a little clarification about relative guilt might be in order.


well, i don't think i implicitly suggested anything like this. however, to respond generally to the point you are trying to make, since the abolition of slavery, blacks in america have generally suffered from racism in some way or another until the present day. so you cannot therefore compare the racism of say for instance, white supremacist types with that of black people. the reasons for it are profoundly different. and bear in mind i am speaking generally here, although i think my case could be extended to most instances that you might consider.


Let me clarify your statement. Are you saying that racism enacted by white supremacists is in some way worse than racism enacted by american blacks? (I specify american here, as the greater part of our black immigrants were exactly that.. immigrants, not slaves or slave descendants, which I assume would put a different spin on things.) Or are you saying that racism from blacks is more justified than racism from whites?

And apologies if you were not intending to imply anything etc, but the phrasing did give that impression.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

05 Oct 2007, 12:48 pm

all i was really trying to say is that the situation is not equal on both sides. i am not trying to justify racism on either side, merely pointing out that since black people in america have pretty much put up with ingrained and institutional racism to various extremes and in one form or another since the first africans were taken there until now, and by and large at the hands of white americans, that it's not hard to see how much of that community might bear umbrage against the white community.


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


RedHanrahan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2007
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,204
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand

05 Oct 2007, 1:59 pm

I have so much sympathy for all those people in the world who being the successful and privileged decedents of successful colonists who stole land and enslaved people, it must be really tough when someone calls you nasty names...


_________________
Just because we can does not mean we should.

What vision is left? And is anyone asking?

Have a great day!


ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

05 Oct 2007, 2:09 pm

peebo wrote:
... black people in america have pretty much put up with ingrained and institutional racism to various extremes and in one form or another since the first africans were taken there until now...

I think the important difference is that in parts of the US discrimination was actually law up until the 50s or 60s, with segregation. This term "institutional racism" is just something left-leaning politicians have invented as a political tool. It doesn't exist. It's not something enshrined in law in the UK, like segregation was in the US, and it really is quite disproportionate for liberals to bleat on about it as if it's equivalent to the real suffering and humiliation legally inflicted on US blacks by a majority-white population that even then was waxing lyrical on the joys of freedom and democracy.

Macbeth also makes another good point that's often overlooked: most blacks here are recent immigrants and their ancestors were not brought here (UK) by the slave trade.