psych wrote:
Triangular_Trees wrote:
but the reason its okay to call USA Americans, and not canadians or Mexicans, is that residents of the USA live in America. United States of America to be exact. Residents of Canada and Mexico do not live in America, They live in North America. they are North Americans, not Americans.
This has been helpful. However, consider the following hypothetical scenario;
Alaska & Canada join together and call themselves the 'United Kingdom of America'. By your logic wouldnt they then become americans? OR would they be disallowed from claiming the 'america' title and instead have to call themselves the 'United Kingdom of North America' (continuing to be called north americans). If so, then why - Is it simply a matter of first come first served?
Ive used Alaska & Canada, but the same question could also be applied to South American countries.
For one thing, that would never happen. Alaska being a US state, and Canada being a country that enjoys being in the Us favor.
Two why in the world would they ever even be considered to be disallowed to change their name to "of America" (which given their national bacground wouldn't happen in 200+ years). That's like saying the United States isn't allowed to use the word UNited, because there is a United Kingdom, oh and United Arab Emirates isn't allowed to use it either by the same reasoning. That's complete nonsense.
If their name was changed to of America than they too would be Americans. However, given the background of the state/country involved, we know that won't ever happen anywhere near our lifetimes