frankcritic wrote:
Well, I've not read the book itself, but I've listened to or read dozens of interviews where Dawkins explains the core ideas of it, so I feel I can comment on them, especially now that I've disclosed not having read it.
I have read The God Delusion, however, where Dawkins is at his most brutal when criticizing religion, so I feel I can comment on whether it would be okay in society to do that.
-Frank
Well, I don't think whether it should be done in polite society is anything more than a side point here.
I know you're referring to the feeling Sedaka expressed, but to me, honest explanation of one's views
is always good. Dawkins
does cross another line, however, when he becomes needlessly vituperative and insulting.
In a way, it's his selling point -- the gruff-but-accurate-expert type, sort of like House.
But it makes just as strong a statement to say, "You know what? Nothing against religious people, or against
God if He exists, but I personally don't believe He does."
That's respectful, plus it is as clear as Dawkins' emotion-weighty denunciations on the issue.
Ben Stein is nicer.
All that said, honesty
does matter more to me than niceness, and with Dawkins, I always get the
feeling he's selling me something. With Stein, in his movie "Expelled", I felt like he laid out all his
cards right at the beginning. He said he doesn't know the answer. (Which is true for us all, when you
get right down to it. Even Dawkins.) Then, he goes and interviews
several leading experts from both sides of the argument.
I found that to be the more persuasive and reasoned approach.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Last edited by Ragtime on 08 May 2008, 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.