Sand wrote:
I wonder why the dismayed revelations of the deception of a man who thought he was acting with integrity is characterized as "snitching" when he is revealing something important of the basic nature of a regime to a public that needs to know the attitudes of the people in control. Should there be something like the "omerta" of the Mafia so that deceit and double dealings remain ever hidden?
Why did he not speak out about the 'culture of deception,' or at least resign, when it could have actually mattered? Why did he remain loyal to Bush in the days of 'Mission Accomplished'? Maybe because
now such a book is a guaranteed financial success? Maybe because, unlike a few years ago, it can only improve his career prospects, given how unpopular and discredited Bush is and that the Democrats have a shot at the Presidency? It puts him in the limelight again for good measure. He was a willing, for-profit participant in Bush's deceptions; how convenient to change his mind, at a fee, now that he's no longer employed by him - once the party conventions are held, Bush will be so yesterday; publish this book much earlier, and sales would not have benefited from such low approval ratings.
I despise the Bush clique, but I have more respect for, say, Rice, who has stuck by Bush, than for rats that abandon a sinking ship; if you helped sink it, harming your country and the world in the process, at least have the decency to go down with it.
_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)
El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)
I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).