Are aspies a threat to the NWO?

Post Reply New Topic

If such a group as the NWO existed, then I would not be surprised. We would be less tied to the existing order and very effective at seeking, defending and devising a new order.

What makes you so sure that the NWO will treat our kind better than the current world order? What if the NWO treats us worse than this one does?

I would not count your chickens ...

Judging by these forums - no, I really doubt that we are.

We have just as much of an ideological split as NT's, so whatever NWO really amounts to, whether its the world of the iron-fisted neo-con with Bin Laden the CIA agent running around orchestrating a fake war, or whether its a far left who runs mostly on pushing socialism, defeating the English language and right to speech, and completely ignoring real problems to help us succumb to them - or if you believe like snake321 does that its both; whichever way it really is, at least one of those three is mostly right just that we could all disagree ad infinitum on who that is for now. I just know that our ranks are probably statistically inseparable or barely separable from NT's - possible slight liberal leaning over and above but then again I remind myself that forum aspies vs. nonforum aspies tend to be slightly different sorts of individuals in how they approach life so that all could be just the microscope of WP.

You do not believe the Iraq war is real? Interesting. It's certainly killed a lot of people on both sides so far, or they "fake" casualities? If you ask any of the military families in the US or Canada about the situation in Iraq and how it's affected them, they'd straighten you pretty quick.

Last edited by slowmutant on 05 Jun 2008, 11:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I think he was delineating the claims of NWO conspiracy theorists and not necessarily his own.

WHat about the fake moon-landing? How do you get pictures of the Earth in space for first time in history from a sound-stage? There would have been no photographs of that type on file at the time. And who could have benefitted from orchestrating a moon landing hoax in the first place? We have artifacts corroborating the moon landing in a museum for all to see ...

Oh you goofy conspiracy nuts.

It's okay. I'll just pass off the "conspiracy theorist" term as echolalia.

That's all conspiracies are, young one - meaningless syllabations. Trust me. There are no conspiracies, and the NWO is merely an urban myth, like any you will find on the Snopes website. Nope; no conspiracies ... not a one ...

enslaving the population, actually...and a dead slave is a worthless slave.


i doubt it's that...but i do think the globalist movement is similar to the theorized "nwo".

we are the sons of the atom. we are homo superior. WE ARE ASPIES!! !

I personally think that the idea of a fake moon landing is silly, but just to play devil`s advocate, I suppose they could have sent up an unmanned spacecraft with a camera. America would have benefited by one-upping the Soviet Union in the space race, scoring a symbolic victory during the cold war. And moon rock asteriods have shown up on earth before - you wouldn`t need to go to the moon to build up a collection.

I think so too. It's happening right now and all you hear is the same old "conspiracy theorist" term tossed around much like on news programs. It makes the person appear to be sane and the one being labelled a theorist to be insane. All the term is really used for now is to make someone feel outcasted and shutting up.

Oh and the nafta super highway is a conspiracy too even though it's being built right now. If you mention that it's factual though then the labeller will deny ever thinking it was a hoax. Funny how that works.

People try to make the term conspiracy into something it isn't because the term has morphed into whatever is commonly heard in the media against those who actually have something to say that is the truth. Here is a fine example of trying to shut someone up using that tactic.


This video was in 1983. Larry Mcdonald in the middle. Notice the other guy who is heckling using that overused term "conspiracy" Yet Larry was right.


Pt. 1

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PAJJ5eRvQw[/youtube]

Pt 2.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma6Cnqqv39M[/youtube]

In not questioning the establishment of society and the way things are, what could be wrong and how to fix it, you will essentially become a slave to it without realizing it. In order words, it's dangerous to never question the prospect of it being a possibility, that in reality, all is predetermined and engineered by standards established by those who control the world's economy, military and goods and services.

Social, Fashion and Entertainment trends are good examples of how corporations manipulate society into a subconscious enslavement, driving to ensure economic sustainability of their own interests, while as a by-product, the government is granted third-party self-regulation of the people themselves, to be shaped and distracted into these certain groups and trends. This is all created as a result of corporate marketing and media influence, making people desperately seek a sense of belonging or desire to fit-in and be apart of society in some way, and follow the superficial culture emphasized to them. This even including some of the alternative 'conspiracy theories' existing too, acting as a honey pot and illusionary second choice of society, when in reality, you're getting just as played there too. In exchange for all of this benefit, the government grants the corporations a say in politics, via established lobbies and grant them certain privileges and protections, unless they really mess up to point where they become 'damaged goods' for all interests. Although strangely they both struggle and hate putting up with each other's arrogant behaviors and policies to weed out the weak, however at the same time, they depend on each other fundamentally to survive.

While everyone is either not believing of their control, or believe in the obscenity of a all-powerful NWO, they are positioned to alienate each other in order to distract everyone from the true nature of things. And that true nature is that there already is a New World Order sort of, but it structured to be a decentralized network of various government and corporate entities who feed off each other mutually, to ensure all their interests are fulfilled in a joint-agreement, with a few true leaders who regulate all their behaviors. It is a regulated and self-sustained system where the true leaders of this world government, don't even need to announce their presence, or order the people to do anything really. Instead, they just simply watch and on occasion, determine what side should win, and what side should loose in any conflict that occurs or they generate, for whatever purpose is necessary, from ideological persuasion/change to financial restructuring. Due to the decentralized nature of their true influence, this does make some tasks impossible to do, and I'm sure they're looking for ways to reduce the overt complexity and rate of failure of their influence. I'm sure Iraq is an example of something that backfired for them, thus proving they are fallible, and not super-elite like the typical NWO conspiracy theorist believe. If anything they are likely more opportunistic, cunning and flexible, than just strategically fixated on establishing one plan for their efforts.

If anything, the talk of NWO is actually a final solution to centralized the entire system, to cut through all the red tape and reduce the amount of conflicting interests all entities involve have, merging corporate and government systems into one single institution. As for religion in the picture? Most religions are both a distraction and ideological pawn in their idea, attempting to self-fulfill the prophecies to basically add the final nail to the coffin of freedom and democracy, solidify support for the institution they want to build, and have a 'messiah' like figure be it's public spokesperson.

It's a hopeful ambition for them to say the least, but they failed to account for one thing, and that is the ecological degradation modern society has done. They're running out of time as once Earth's ecological system fails, the ramification will likely mean the extinction of humanity, therefore they lose in the very end.

But to answer the question at hand, it doesn't matter what you are, if you believe in the NWO and want to try and stop them, then you would be considered a negligible threat to their interest, if anything they'd laugh at you and say, "So what? You know about us, who cares. So what are you going to do about it? whine to everyone else? like they'd believe you anyway."

Last edited by Nexus on 06 Jun 2008, 7:14 am, edited 2 times in total.

NWO? there's nothing new about it, in fact in essence its exactly the same as all the ones before it. History books anyone?

Likeeee OMMMGMGMGMGMGMGMgGGG

NWO is like sooooo 1940 did you not get the memo??! !

Gag me with a spoon (1983)

All this NWO s**t started around the early 1970s when the Pentacostal evangelists (such as those from the Assemblies Of God) were trying to shit-scare everyone into believing that the antichrist was due at the turn of the century. They crapped on about how cash would be phased out and everyone would carry the mark of the beast. It was actually based on some lunatic's reading of Revelation, and none of his theories could be backed up. Now we are in 2008, and sure we are using bar-codes and credit cards, but as for a New World Order such as what they were on about? Hogwash! The antichrist has been and gone, he was gone before your religion got started. And his name was NERO.

And as for Christ's second coming, I thought he was supposed to have died a virgin.......